This is the second Zoe Chambers mystery that I have read (beginning the series at book 6), and is just as thrilling as “Uneasy Prey”. Both can be read as standalones, but obviously, you will get a little more of the main character development if you read the whole series.
Zoe Chambers’ main job is as a paramedic, but she is also a deputy coroner. When the Coroner is hospitalised due to ill-health, Zoe ends up with two fulltime jobs, and precious little spare time to spend with her partner, police chief, Pete Adams. Pete is also run off his feet, working double shifts, as one of his officers is on psychological sick leave following a fatal shooting. Fortunately, their work cases often interconnect – and they do get to spend time together over maimed or dead bodies – even if their time as a couple is severely restricted.
Their first joint case is a machete attack on an unarmed gentleman, or that is what is reported. The machete turns out to be corn knife – still possibly deadly – but definitely not this time. Zoe’s sympathies are completely with the knife wielder, who had been trying to stop his objectionable neighbour (Professor K) from dumping potentially toxic grass clippings into his horse paddock. Zoe, as a committed horsewoman, understood how dangerous those clippings could be. Unfortunately, Pete still has to arrest Machete Man.
Professor K is universally disliked, and you quickly have him down as the most likely (and deserving) first corpse. But that honour goes to an ex-cop, who just happens to live at the same retirement home as Pete’s father. The ex-cop is another abrasive type, who – like Professor K – seems to have any number of ill-wishers. Pete’s father has long been certain that there is some-one bumping off the residents of his home, Golden Oaks, (elderly people keep leaving in body bags, never to reappear). This time it is not the Alzheimer’s talking – the murder is real.
All the cases become intertwined, suspects are considered and discounted, another body, more suspects and possible motives: money, revenge, bad timing, … A number of the elderly residents of Golden Oaks are co-opted in to help with Zoe’s investigations – showing that the old and disabled should never be underestimated.
Meanwhile, Zoe discovers that she has a step-brother, Jason, who generously donates his time and money to help fix up her dilapidated farm, to make up for the lost years. Zoe is overjoyed to finally have a sibling – and one who reminds her so much of her dead father. Pete, being a cop, is highly suspicious (jealous?), but all checks show that Jason is above board.
While the ending does not come completely out of the blue, you would be hard pressed to work it all out from the preceding story. That does not mean that the ending does not make sense – it does – in a sad way. Not all the strands are tidied up. While I might have liked a bit more closure, the presence of some loose ends does give the story a lot more realism.
Apart from the excellent murder-mystery story, and the wonderful characterisation, there are also some deep philosophical issues raised. The first is what constitutes ‘family’. Does a DNA match create a sibling bond? Do you see a family likeness in a long lost relative because it is there, or just because you want it to be? Are people whose family has been pulled apart by death, adoption, divorce etc, more likely to have a physical and psychological need for a new blood tie? Does blood actually matter? If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck …
The second issue is the role of the police force. Except in an anarchic state, there need to be rules to govern (guide) behaviour for the sake of societal cohesion. A police force is charged with upholding those rules. A policeman shooting dead an armed and dangerous man, may have saved a life, but is the value of the life saved always greater than the one lost? Who should decide? Can (should) the decision be made in split second? Can the shooter live with the guilt?
Crimes ruin lives – and many believe that the perpetrators of crimes must pay. The victims always lose – but does punishing the criminal help the victim? Putting criminals in jail shields society for a while, but does the criminal emerge reformed?, embittered?, a more accomplished criminal? A criminal released from jail has ‘paid their debt to society’, but often now faces a ruined life, forever stigmatised by their crime. What have their family done to deserve having their lives ruined as well? Does Machete Man need to be arrested, have a criminal record and be forever after suspected of every violent crime committed in his vicinity? Is possession of cannabis so heinous that the lives of not only the possessor, but of at least five other people are irreparably damaged by the arrest and jail sentence?
So, you can read this book just as a very engaging, well-constructed who-dunnit, or you can also take a moment to ponder the questions posed. No answers supplied!
I loved this book, would recommend it highly, and am very interested in reading more in this series.
I received this copy from the author and publisher via Edelweiss in exchange for an honest review. All opinions are my own.