I went into this book with a pre-conceived notion that this book would approach its topic from a different approach taken, i.e. how modern films have (mis)appropriated ancient Roman sources to create new cultural narratives that have warped our understanding of Roman society, politics etc. However Wyke doesn't quite stay on that (admittedly narrow) academic remit. In fact, she creates a complex alternative comparative analysis that arguably does more to explore the phenomenon of ancient Rome on film than my original expectation. She has in fact deconstructed the idea of 'ancient Roman cinema' to form a multi-faceted narrative that takes into account Italian nationalism, American perceptions of empire and republicanism, Orientalism, commodification and commercialisation of antiquity, the aesthetics of Victorian novels and theatre, and the depiction of eroticism in the examined films.
By taking a thematic, case study approach Wyke does an excellent job of identifying and elaborating on each of the points she makes about the films. For example, her references to Said's Orientalism as a means to interpret the cinematic representations of Cleopatra are rather illuminating and pertinent. The same goes for the (obvious) socialist and communist aspects of 'Spartacus', and the lesser obvious Zionist message in the Kubrick/Trumbo/Douglas version. It was also intriguing to read of the gangster film correlations in the RKO version of 'The Last Days of Pompeii'.
Perhaps the most important conclusions that may be drawn from Wyke's very rewarding analysis of the cinematic depiction of ancient Rome are that the films are cultural artefacts that owe arguably more to the respective socio-political environments within which they are produced (i.e. Italian or American cinema) and that they are drastically removed from 'ancient history', except where said ancient Roman history can provide a setting, a narrative, characters and a subtext that conforms to contemporary values.