What do you think?
Rate this book


A stranger takes over a role in a play, leaving the rest of the cast to ponder his motives.
Two minutes into the second act, there is a knock on Nicolas Boehlmer’s dressing-room door, just as he’s smoking his last cigarette before having to go back on stage . . . and, without thinking, he says,“Come in,” still in character. He quickly finds himself bound, gagged, and stripped by a man who appears to be his mirror image: costumed in the same wig, make-up, and clothes. Nicolas is powerless to prevent his usurper from going out and playing his role—with increasingly ridiculous consequences. Is this “upstaging” the act of a depraved amateur? Sabotage by a rival? A piece of guerrilla theater? A political statement? Whatever the cause, Nicolas and his fellow actors soon find their play—and their lives—making less and less sense, as the parts they play come under assault by this irrational intruder.96 pages, Paperback
First published June 14, 2011
think of all the things that must pass through an actor's mind when he or she is confronting something unprecedented onstage, and to which he or she must react in the unseen blink of an eye. question after question. has there been an accident? was this planned? is it a test? a destabilization exercise? an initiation ritual? a waking nightmare? but there's little time to wonder, and none to be shocked.
The Usurper, however, did not allow his character to slide down the slippery slope of outraged stoicism, as is called for in Flavy's play (a development very much in accord with what we know of the historical Soufissis). He kept to his lines, and yet at the same time began to rebel against it. At first this was done almost imperceptibly. Only gradually did his undermining of the text become clear. The Usurper succeeded thereby in slowly unsettling the usually effortless assurance of Jean-Francois Ernu, and, thereby, of the President. At first it was a discrete clinamen, a slight deviation of the orderly descent of textual atoms--a not absent in one place and slipped in somewhere else.
"I am indeed taking part of you, but you will soon find it returned unharmed. You have my word." The Usurper added: "In case this does not go without saying, I very much admire your work."
These hopes were soon dashed, however, as it became clear that the man playing the Republican Theodore Soufissis (the rebellious object of the aforementioned presidential ingratitude) had begun to deviate from the text of Flavy's play. By his own admission, Marcel Flavy is by no means a revolutionary writer, and does not personally share the radical theses of his character Soufissis, or even those of the other more or less Soufissisian figures whom the president encounters during his adventure. Flavy's general intention was to advocate a certain tolerance without presenting the political theories of this or that individual in any detail. What he wanted to explore were the dramatic possibilities of the encounter between two main characters--and to play upon the traces of past complicity resting beneath the present resentment. Flavy's text is about friendship confronted with an ambition that has become too great to share. Complicating Flavy's undertaking was the people's image of Theodore Soufissis--held up as he is in our Republic as a hero whose life was rich in accident and adventure, full of a Romanticism remote from any Realpolitik.