What do you think?
Rate this book
The New Vichy Syndrome: Why European Intellectuals Surrender to Barbarism
Western Europe is in a strangely neurotic condition of being smug and terrified at the same time. On the one hand, Europeans believe they have at last created an ideal social and political system in which man can live comfortably. In many ways, things have never been better on the old continent. On the other hand, there is growing anxiety that Europe is quickly falling behind in an aggressive, globalized world. Europe is at the forefront of nothing, its demographics are rapidly transforming in unsettling ways, and the ancient threat of barbarian invasion has resurfaced in a fresh manifestation.
In The New Vichy Syndrome, Theodore Dalrymple traces this malaise back to the great conflicts of the last century and their devastating effects upon the European psyche. From issues of religion, class, colonialism, and nationalism, Europeans hold a “miserablist” view of their history, one that alternates between indifference and outright contempt of the past. Today’s Europeans no longer believe in anything but personal economic security, an increased standard of living, shorter working hours, and long vacations in exotic locales.
The result, Dalrymple asserts, is an unwillingness to preserve European achievements and the dismantling of western culture by Europeans themselves. As vapid hedonism and aggressive Islamism fill this cultural void, Europeans have no one else to blame for their plight.
In The New Vichy Syndrome, Theodore Dalrymple traces this malaise back to the great conflicts of the last century and their devastating effects upon the European psyche. From issues of religion, class, colonialism, and nationalism, Europeans hold a “miserablist” view of their history, one that alternates between indifference and outright contempt of the past. Today’s Europeans no longer believe in anything but personal economic security, an increased standard of living, shorter working hours, and long vacations in exotic locales.
The result, Dalrymple asserts, is an unwillingness to preserve European achievements and the dismantling of western culture by Europeans themselves. As vapid hedonism and aggressive Islamism fill this cultural void, Europeans have no one else to blame for their plight.
160 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2010
21 people are currently reading
430 people want to read
About the author
Theodore Dalrymple
100 books624 followersAnthony Malcolm Daniels, who generally uses the pen name Theodore Dalrymple, is an English writer and retired prison doctor and psychiatrist. He worked in a number of Sub-Saharan African countries as well as in the east end of London. Before his retirement in 2005, he worked in City Hospital, Birmingham and Winson Green Prison in inner-city Birmingham, England.
Daniels is a contributing editor to City Journal, published by the Manhattan Institute, where he is the Dietrich Weismann Fellow. In addition to City Journal, his work has appeared in The British Medical Journal, The Times, The Observer, The Daily Telegraph, The Spectator, The Salisbury Review, National Review, and Axess magasin.
In 2011, Dalrymple received the 2011 Freedom Prize from the Flemish think tank Libera!.
Daniels is a contributing editor to City Journal, published by the Manhattan Institute, where he is the Dietrich Weismann Fellow. In addition to City Journal, his work has appeared in The British Medical Journal, The Times, The Observer, The Daily Telegraph, The Spectator, The Salisbury Review, National Review, and Axess magasin.
In 2011, Dalrymple received the 2011 Freedom Prize from the Flemish think tank Libera!.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 22 of 22 reviews
February 11, 2014
Theodore Dalrymple (Anthony Daniel's nom de plume), applies his considerable erudition and wit to the decline of Western Civilization yet again, this time looking at continental Europe and specifically looking at the European Union as an institution. The title is misleading since the subject of the title is tangential to the book as a whole which traces the intellectual and sociological transformation of Europe in the twentieth century and frankly has little to do with the surrender to barbarism which is merely a symptom of a larger cultural malady. I guess the publisher needed to capitalize on post-9/11 hysteria among the right-wing to drum up book sales.
A lot of what is here you may have read before in Daniel's columns for the New English Review and The New Criterion. One perspective on the decline of Western Civilization that I had not considered before or read elsewhere was the idea that near universal access to higher education is partly responsible because skepticism, as a philosophical discipline, undermines common sense, moral and aesthetic judgements that undergird the culture and enable the widespread acceptance of a debasement of the culture as a whole.
A lot of what is here you may have read before in Daniel's columns for the New English Review and The New Criterion. One perspective on the decline of Western Civilization that I had not considered before or read elsewhere was the idea that near universal access to higher education is partly responsible because skepticism, as a philosophical discipline, undermines common sense, moral and aesthetic judgements that undergird the culture and enable the widespread acceptance of a debasement of the culture as a whole.
February 1, 2016
I had this book on my shelf and remembered only slightly it's contents from a reading a few years ago. After a second reading, I can understand why it didn't make much of an impression the first time. The writing style and organization is at times incoherent, the author makes many vague historical references and attempts clarity with footnotes that seem to have no relation to his train of thought. It seems that the text was dictated verbally and later transcribed by an indifferent editor. Also, it seemed that the author was hesitant to state his real opinions about Europe's identity crisis, so the book lacked teeth and felt tiresome in its attempts to state both sides of any issue. No wonder Europe is in decline. He did make some salient points about World War 2 and the effects it had on European power and attitudes towards itself. His quick thoughts on the United States were far too optomistic. We are walking in the same footsteps as Europe, culturally and socially, and our Protestant roots and belief in our own exceptionalism won't save us. We can blame the globalization of financial markets for that. We will all collapse together in one big human tsunami of greed and stupidity.
February 4, 2019
I found this book to be deeply interesting and thought-provoking, as it is written from the point of view of someone who understands history and politics and the way that Europe has tragically lost its self-confidence in the face of self-inflicted disaster during the course of the 20th century. That Europeans are simultaneously arrogant bureaucrats (as can be seen by their group think when it comes to issues of regulations and climate change) and also craven cowards who it would be insulting to poultry to compare to chickens, is something that is easy enough to recognize. Yet uncovering the implications and ramifications of this is not something that is always done, and without praising America completely the author manages to engage in this task quite well, pointing out what separates the United States from Europe and what common malaise afflicts them both, especially among the leftists of the United States' political spectrum. There was a lot to enjoy and appreciate here, and the author's conclusions and analysis are both dryly humorous as well as darkly relevant in an age where barbarism is a great threat that many political leaders are simply unequipped to handle.
In this short but powerful expose of European weakness, the author makes his point in about 150 pages. After a short preface, the author discusses what is rotten in the European Union, what everyone acknowledges to be weakness and corruption and bloated bureaucracy (1). After that the author talks about the demographic worries of Muslim takeover (2), a look at declining fertility and various other explorations of this demography (3), and some summary conclusions thus far (4). After that, the author critiques the relativism that is so common in European thinking and behavior (5) and spends seven chapters asking why Europeans are like this (6-12), spending a great deal of time looking at the catastrophes of World War I and II that crippled European colonial power as well as self-confidence. The author looks at the influence of defeatist intellectuals as well as corrupt political leaders (especially in France) on the inability of European nations to deal with their own historical sins and face up to their situation. Of particular interest and humor is when the author notes that dividing up nations by ethnicity only meant that nation-states were afflicted by new minority problems, which can be seen in other parts of the world like the Near East. Finally, the author concludes with a look at the consequences of European weakness and folly (13).
What would it take for Europe to revive in a form that is likely to please anyone? While it is possible that continued European weakness could lead to the search for scapegoats and the rise of right-wing groups, as happened during the interwar period, it is also possible that an insecure bureaucracy could lead to oppression through socialistic means by seeking to provide people with security in the face of an insecure world. Both fear and loss could trigger Europe to see a way out of its weakness through projecting more strength than it in fact possesses. It is hard to see a way that European cultures can become more dynamic without coming to terms with their own past and changing their values and indeed engaging in some sort of revival with ideas of progress and ultimate truth that are more than simply material in nature. The author, wisely, does not attempt to predict what will happen, given the difficulties of that task, but he does a good job at explaining what has happened to Europe to bring it to the point where it now is, and he reminds Americans that we are not that far behind if we continue to suffer from the same malaise that afflicts our left.
In this short but powerful expose of European weakness, the author makes his point in about 150 pages. After a short preface, the author discusses what is rotten in the European Union, what everyone acknowledges to be weakness and corruption and bloated bureaucracy (1). After that the author talks about the demographic worries of Muslim takeover (2), a look at declining fertility and various other explorations of this demography (3), and some summary conclusions thus far (4). After that, the author critiques the relativism that is so common in European thinking and behavior (5) and spends seven chapters asking why Europeans are like this (6-12), spending a great deal of time looking at the catastrophes of World War I and II that crippled European colonial power as well as self-confidence. The author looks at the influence of defeatist intellectuals as well as corrupt political leaders (especially in France) on the inability of European nations to deal with their own historical sins and face up to their situation. Of particular interest and humor is when the author notes that dividing up nations by ethnicity only meant that nation-states were afflicted by new minority problems, which can be seen in other parts of the world like the Near East. Finally, the author concludes with a look at the consequences of European weakness and folly (13).
What would it take for Europe to revive in a form that is likely to please anyone? While it is possible that continued European weakness could lead to the search for scapegoats and the rise of right-wing groups, as happened during the interwar period, it is also possible that an insecure bureaucracy could lead to oppression through socialistic means by seeking to provide people with security in the face of an insecure world. Both fear and loss could trigger Europe to see a way out of its weakness through projecting more strength than it in fact possesses. It is hard to see a way that European cultures can become more dynamic without coming to terms with their own past and changing their values and indeed engaging in some sort of revival with ideas of progress and ultimate truth that are more than simply material in nature. The author, wisely, does not attempt to predict what will happen, given the difficulties of that task, but he does a good job at explaining what has happened to Europe to bring it to the point where it now is, and he reminds Americans that we are not that far behind if we continue to suffer from the same malaise that afflicts our left.
May 15, 2015
A look at thinking in Europe. Hits on all sorts of topics. Demographic fallacies. Greek problems with debt -- reflected on a few years ago. the decline of religion. The effects of World War I (including that the "disillusionment" took some time after the war to hit) and World War II. Colonies and their loss. And more.
November 28, 2020
With a bit of a rambling-man habit and a gracious helping of Romance-language maxims, this book is not an especially easy read in spite of its small page count, but certainly an entertaining one. I went in expecting to morally disagree with the author based on the title and cover binding alone; ended up very shortly surprised; found myself nodding in admittance of a few faults of my own; and thoroughly enjoying the change of pace Dalrymple's expressive multilingual style and verbosity provided to someone who has been on a recent warpath of reading translated North Korean biographies.
I only hold off on the five star rating because while I enjoyed the read thoroughly and it has piqued my interest in the author's work as a whole, I did find the sheer number of footnotes, the frequency of non-English vocabulary which does in a handful of instances feel too far from English understanding to intuit, and the waxing-oratory format by which information was presented to be detractors enough to not want to quite call this one a masterpiece. In a better world - on a better platform than Goodreads - I'd give this a 4.5. Maybe I'll chew on it and give it a 5 in favor of underscoring the book as worth one's time to read on this site, and perhaps I'll also come to appreciate the author's style with future reading and decide that my perceived issues were less the author's and his editor's problems, and more of my own. What a concept!
An admittedly lazy statement, but the book leaves one with a lot to think about. A far, far more even-handed analysis than I would have expected from the title, which no doubt has done some discredit to the author's merit, although its potentially incendiary appearance at first glance to shelf-browsers and webpage-scrollers may have done more than enough going the other way.
I only hold off on the five star rating because while I enjoyed the read thoroughly and it has piqued my interest in the author's work as a whole, I did find the sheer number of footnotes, the frequency of non-English vocabulary which does in a handful of instances feel too far from English understanding to intuit, and the waxing-oratory format by which information was presented to be detractors enough to not want to quite call this one a masterpiece. In a better world - on a better platform than Goodreads - I'd give this a 4.5. Maybe I'll chew on it and give it a 5 in favor of underscoring the book as worth one's time to read on this site, and perhaps I'll also come to appreciate the author's style with future reading and decide that my perceived issues were less the author's and his editor's problems, and more of my own. What a concept!
An admittedly lazy statement, but the book leaves one with a lot to think about. A far, far more even-handed analysis than I would have expected from the title, which no doubt has done some discredit to the author's merit, although its potentially incendiary appearance at first glance to shelf-browsers and webpage-scrollers may have done more than enough going the other way.
May 18, 2018
Theodore Dalrymple is a marvelous essayist, but he is at his best when he allows his mind to wander freely onto whatever topic catches his interest. Thus, his best books are collections of essays on various and diverse topics, typically collected from his periodic online and print essays over time.
As he himself put it in Farewell Fear,
As he himself put it in Farewell Fear,
“Whenever it is imperatively necessary for me to read a book pursuant to something I am currently writing about, I immediately lose interest in it… and then I want to read about something else entirely.This book is different. Although structured as short essays, clearly Dalrymple forced himself to sit down and write a collection of essays on a common theme. It is still very good, but not as good as his best work.
Often I read more than one book at a time. When I tire of one I fly to another. My mind is magpie-like, attracted by what shines for a moment”
July 2, 2017
Dalrymple is what the world needs more of, a smart guy willing to tell it like he thinks it is. He provides a richly textured diagnosis/lamentation about the state of Europe, asking--and sometimes answering--pointed questions that many people shy away from, while maintaining a fundamentally optimistic outlook about the feasibility of positive change.
March 20, 2016
Theodora Dalrymple is one of the most interesting writers at this moment in our cultures story. All of his books are worth reading.
This one will serve as a useful pre-read for the referendum on the year to take place in June 2016.
This one will serve as a useful pre-read for the referendum on the year to take place in June 2016.
November 10, 2021
This book was written in 2010. Dalrymple discusses the decline of European culture and civilization. He talks about anxiety and weakness.
In chapter 2 he discusses demographic woes.
In chapter 3 he focuses on Muslims. How their demographics are so very much different than the natives in European countries. He talks about the treatment of Muslim women in European countries and how it is ignored by leftist agitators and activists who fight for Muslim causes.
Chapter 5 is a very interesting chapter on relativism both in ethics and knowledge. He spends a little time on Thomas Kuhn. Then he changes to the subject of choice and how it has become the most important value in the west.
In chapter 6, he points out we are a herd of individuals. He also talks about the decline of religion in the west. The greatest effect being we are left with the individualism that Christianity gave us but no longer have any humility that came to us from our belief in the existence of God.
Consumerism is not transcendent.
“Just as Leninists knew what was good for the proletariat, thereby conferring on themselves a gratifyingly providential role, so the environmentalists now know what is good for humanity and likewise confer on themselves a providential role.“
He finishes chapter 6 by discussing the nature of national identity and how it has been encouraged to promote the European project in Europe but as a counter example he discusses what happened in Africa during colonial times and after. The arbitrary borders the colonists had imposed on the continent were kept when the colonists left or were forced out.
In chapter 7 he discusses the fact that we have more than one identity. We may have a national identity but we also have an occupational one. But that is limited. After all, Soviet brotherhood was never very successful. So we are left with the notion that national identity leads to war. I am not as concerned about this as perhaps he or others might be. As I see it globalization is a very great threat to liberty. And the only real bulwark against it is national identity. Active trade with other countries can limit aggression.
He spends the next several chapters discussing how various countries in Europe have very blemished historical records.
In chapter 12, he discusses the motivations of modern politicians and historians. He points out one: bitterness at the loss of European power and significance in the world at the end of the second world war.
Two, “limitless guilt being a form of grandiosity, the past commission of great crimes is a consolation for those who have lost power. In other words, we are still important.” But this is quite an about face. “That is why we can go almost seamlessly from believing that everything we have done and do is the best, that we are civilized in the world, to the believe that we have ruined the world and that everything that is bad and it is ultimately traceable to us.“ Page 142.
Three, “a miserablist history is a very useful instrument in securing if not a social revolution then at least a change or expansion of elites.” The country must’ve been led at that time by the wrong people. “Bureaucracies must be created to write the wrongs of the past, the very bureaucracies that absorb the newly educated thousands and millions.“
The author spends the last couple of pages talking about the differences and similarities between the situation in Europe and the situation in America. He thinks that the situation in America quite possibly is a little bit better than that found in Europe. Plenty of Americans are still religious. America was founded on a philosophy intentionally and not accidentally is in the case of the countries of Europe. He does worry about the culture war as he sees it in 2010 when this book was written.
In chapter 2 he discusses demographic woes.
In chapter 3 he focuses on Muslims. How their demographics are so very much different than the natives in European countries. He talks about the treatment of Muslim women in European countries and how it is ignored by leftist agitators and activists who fight for Muslim causes.
Chapter 5 is a very interesting chapter on relativism both in ethics and knowledge. He spends a little time on Thomas Kuhn. Then he changes to the subject of choice and how it has become the most important value in the west.
In chapter 6, he points out we are a herd of individuals. He also talks about the decline of religion in the west. The greatest effect being we are left with the individualism that Christianity gave us but no longer have any humility that came to us from our belief in the existence of God.
Consumerism is not transcendent.
“Just as Leninists knew what was good for the proletariat, thereby conferring on themselves a gratifyingly providential role, so the environmentalists now know what is good for humanity and likewise confer on themselves a providential role.“
He finishes chapter 6 by discussing the nature of national identity and how it has been encouraged to promote the European project in Europe but as a counter example he discusses what happened in Africa during colonial times and after. The arbitrary borders the colonists had imposed on the continent were kept when the colonists left or were forced out.
In chapter 7 he discusses the fact that we have more than one identity. We may have a national identity but we also have an occupational one. But that is limited. After all, Soviet brotherhood was never very successful. So we are left with the notion that national identity leads to war. I am not as concerned about this as perhaps he or others might be. As I see it globalization is a very great threat to liberty. And the only real bulwark against it is national identity. Active trade with other countries can limit aggression.
He spends the next several chapters discussing how various countries in Europe have very blemished historical records.
In chapter 12, he discusses the motivations of modern politicians and historians. He points out one: bitterness at the loss of European power and significance in the world at the end of the second world war.
Two, “limitless guilt being a form of grandiosity, the past commission of great crimes is a consolation for those who have lost power. In other words, we are still important.” But this is quite an about face. “That is why we can go almost seamlessly from believing that everything we have done and do is the best, that we are civilized in the world, to the believe that we have ruined the world and that everything that is bad and it is ultimately traceable to us.“ Page 142.
Three, “a miserablist history is a very useful instrument in securing if not a social revolution then at least a change or expansion of elites.” The country must’ve been led at that time by the wrong people. “Bureaucracies must be created to write the wrongs of the past, the very bureaucracies that absorb the newly educated thousands and millions.“
The author spends the last couple of pages talking about the differences and similarities between the situation in Europe and the situation in America. He thinks that the situation in America quite possibly is a little bit better than that found in Europe. Plenty of Americans are still religious. America was founded on a philosophy intentionally and not accidentally is in the case of the countries of Europe. He does worry about the culture war as he sees it in 2010 when this book was written.
September 10, 2018
The New Vichy Syndrome by Theodore Dalrymple is a book dedicated to exploring the various ills infecting Europe.
While there are many good things to be said about Europe, such as life expectancy and wealth, there is an impeding sense of doom when contrasting European cities to Beijing or Dubai. No technological breakthrough seems to be in sight to keep up with the cheap labor of China or India and Europe is dependent on foreign energy and resources.
The European man no longer wishes to have children. Combined with a raising life expectancy this introduces worries about sustainability and unvoiced fears about immigration as a potential solution. The author dismisses both problems as not insurmountable: societies adapt, and while some cultures might not be compatible with ours, mostly immigrants integrate well into European life.
Instead, he argues, the real problem of Europe is the culture that demands luxury and safety without sacrificing anything, and appeases the worst barbarities of foreign cultures (e.g how the issue of a cartoon depicting Mohammed was treated in Holland). Paradoxically, in a continent rapidly shifting its demographics, youth culture predominates while the needs and values of elders are ignored.
Dalrymple describes the root causes of this malaise of values: moral relativism which dissolves the inherent bounds placed on personal conduct, and the lack of transcendent meaning needed to live a good, purposeful life. Instead, life is lived to experience as many things as possible, without commitment because commitment implies denying oneself of future options, while at the same time escalating the quantity and quality of experience. Loss of religion inflated man's sense of self without giving him any humility.
The author argues that for civilization to thrive it needs to be both open to innovation but not blind to its own achievements, so that its best parts are preserved. Europeans are anxious about their own history while at the same time viewing it in a smug, shallow and self-deprecating manner in the form of historical miserablism - European history is NOTHING BUT bloodshed and war.
I love Theodore Dalrymple. He writes with a style and clarity that I aspire to have one day. While the New Vichy syndrome exemplifies his style, I found the book to be weak in terms of coherence. The arguments that the author presents in each chapter are well thought-out and some were terrifyingly insightful. But I did not find an underlying theme or a big thought connecting the logic. Nevertheless, I would be amiss not to recommend it to anyone interested in Europe's future, its culture, and values.
While there are many good things to be said about Europe, such as life expectancy and wealth, there is an impeding sense of doom when contrasting European cities to Beijing or Dubai. No technological breakthrough seems to be in sight to keep up with the cheap labor of China or India and Europe is dependent on foreign energy and resources.
The European man no longer wishes to have children. Combined with a raising life expectancy this introduces worries about sustainability and unvoiced fears about immigration as a potential solution. The author dismisses both problems as not insurmountable: societies adapt, and while some cultures might not be compatible with ours, mostly immigrants integrate well into European life.
Instead, he argues, the real problem of Europe is the culture that demands luxury and safety without sacrificing anything, and appeases the worst barbarities of foreign cultures (e.g how the issue of a cartoon depicting Mohammed was treated in Holland). Paradoxically, in a continent rapidly shifting its demographics, youth culture predominates while the needs and values of elders are ignored.
Dalrymple describes the root causes of this malaise of values: moral relativism which dissolves the inherent bounds placed on personal conduct, and the lack of transcendent meaning needed to live a good, purposeful life. Instead, life is lived to experience as many things as possible, without commitment because commitment implies denying oneself of future options, while at the same time escalating the quantity and quality of experience. Loss of religion inflated man's sense of self without giving him any humility.
The author argues that for civilization to thrive it needs to be both open to innovation but not blind to its own achievements, so that its best parts are preserved. Europeans are anxious about their own history while at the same time viewing it in a smug, shallow and self-deprecating manner in the form of historical miserablism - European history is NOTHING BUT bloodshed and war.
I love Theodore Dalrymple. He writes with a style and clarity that I aspire to have one day. While the New Vichy syndrome exemplifies his style, I found the book to be weak in terms of coherence. The arguments that the author presents in each chapter are well thought-out and some were terrifyingly insightful. But I did not find an underlying theme or a big thought connecting the logic. Nevertheless, I would be amiss not to recommend it to anyone interested in Europe's future, its culture, and values.
February 10, 2022
Dalrymple is one of my favorite authors, but I didn’t enjoy this read overall. It feels like scattered thoughts in need of an editor. There were some good points, and I learned a few things, but it was a stilted read. It referred to specific events and people in France that I didn’t understand, which also hampered my reading.
May 13, 2018
Theodore Dalrymple is a super interesting author, even if you don't happen to agree with him all the time. This series of essays is Dalrymple at his best, with a sober and levelheaded analysis of the current European (and Western) maladies.
May 11, 2020
A critique of Europe in decline into the morass of post-modernity (a prevailing theme in TD's writing - and don't mention Le Corbusier!) and cultural self loathing. Clear and astute writing. Insightful.
November 1, 2025
About the creation of the EU and intellectual arrogance. Not as good as his normal social commentary.
December 8, 2012
Deep, subtle analysis of the European psyche by a psychiatrist. The author is highly opinionated, and his opinions mostly match my own; I liked them and the way he expressed them.
At the beginning of the 20th century, Europe was the center of the world of art, science, finance, manufacturing, culture, and military power, with colonies across the globe. Well before the end of the 20th century, the colonies had become independent and it was clear that the U.S. had taken over the leadership in nearly all areas, with consequent wounds to Europeans' self-regard and self-confidence, and a good bit of national sovereignty had been surrendered in an effort to create the European Union and thus prevent future great wars.
I learned quite a bit about the 20th century, especially the two great wars, both factually and from the European point of view. Dalrymple is British, his wife French. He does a good job of admitting his own biases, and tries to be as objective as possible.
At the beginning of the 20th century, Europe was the center of the world of art, science, finance, manufacturing, culture, and military power, with colonies across the globe. Well before the end of the 20th century, the colonies had become independent and it was clear that the U.S. had taken over the leadership in nearly all areas, with consequent wounds to Europeans' self-regard and self-confidence, and a good bit of national sovereignty had been surrendered in an effort to create the European Union and thus prevent future great wars.
I learned quite a bit about the 20th century, especially the two great wars, both factually and from the European point of view. Dalrymple is British, his wife French. He does a good job of admitting his own biases, and tries to be as objective as possible.
August 17, 2010
I saw this on the "new" shelf at the library and picked it up.
This book should be subtitled "Why Europeans deprecate themselves."
It is a judgmental book that explains the European psyche and how it got there (especial attention is paid go World Wars I and II leading to a total peace/total war mindset with no middle-ground spectrum).
It was a very interesting read, but major points are docked for assuming too much previous knowledge about world or European history, and also for using too many uncommon French phrases without explanations (usually that's a problem with Latin phrases, not French). So, I give it a 3.
Also, "miserabilism" is defined in a footnote on page 154. There are 155 pages. Who would wait until the second-to-last page to define a major theme of the book? (Perhaps it was explained at first mention, I don't remember.)
This book should be subtitled "Why Europeans deprecate themselves."
It is a judgmental book that explains the European psyche and how it got there (especial attention is paid go World Wars I and II leading to a total peace/total war mindset with no middle-ground spectrum).
It was a very interesting read, but major points are docked for assuming too much previous knowledge about world or European history, and also for using too many uncommon French phrases without explanations (usually that's a problem with Latin phrases, not French). So, I give it a 3.
Also, "miserabilism" is defined in a footnote on page 154. There are 155 pages. Who would wait until the second-to-last page to define a major theme of the book? (Perhaps it was explained at first mention, I don't remember.)
September 10, 2011
Good, but my edition badly needed a better editor.
September 3, 2015
"You might say of Europe that it had lost its purpose, and not found any to replace it."
January 10, 2016
Interesting take on Europe
Interesting but I would have like to know more about European culture and how it has changed. This just touched at it.
Interesting but I would have like to know more about European culture and how it has changed. This just touched at it.
January 22, 2016
Interesting analysis of the would be" United States of Europe."
May 23, 2021
I liked it. The author is English so the prose is a bit different than this side of the Atlantic, but still readable.
November 10, 2024
Ideas have consequences . What surfaces now as a norms starts as a very innocent idea, usually thought out and supported by group of intellectuals.
Displaying 1 - 22 of 22 reviews