This book contains two erotic short stories featuring committed, polyfaithful (polyamours) F/M/M ménage relationships.
Stay With Me 3 Stars
Workaholic husbands, Logan and Rhys continually seem to neglect their wife Catherine. When the husbands cancel (again!) right before their Jamaican vacation Catherine decides she needs some time alone to contemplate her future so she leaves, unannounced, and goes on the vacation alone. Two days later the men realize she's gone and follow her with the intention of winning her back.
I suppose my main complaint here was that "winning her back" involved a lot of sex. You have to have the sex for it to be erotic but a bit more action and a bit less activity might have been a more believable route. Catherine's husbands were pretty big jerks, Logan maybe more than Rhys, and she takes them back more than once (I probably would too). If I'm suspending disbelief over all the 'win her back' sex then I'm suspending it there as well. Problems aside I thought it wasn't a terrible way to spend a couple hours.
Songbird 3 Stars
Emily is in love with the Donovan brothers. All three of them. She confess her love to the oldest, Taggert and the middle brother Greer but they reject her. Baby brother Sean marries her and they leave the family ranch and move into a hotel in town. Four years later, Sean's been dead (murdered) a year and Emily is barely surviving, isolated in a tiny apartment in the city. Taggert and Greer arrive unexpectedly to bring Emmy back home and fix a mistake they both realize they made 4 years earlier.
There are a few irksome issues dealing mainly with dialogue. Brothers in a ménage, is that any weirder than former strangers or best friends in a ménage? I'm not sure, but maybe? There are some fairly emotional moments and perhaps a few tiny tears were shed. Again, not outstanding or completely believable but fairly hot and sometimes that's what counts.
Less book Review, More Personal, Flawed, Circular Thinking on Ménages:
This is my first foray into such avocation so my feelings are a bit conflicted, so much so that I'm not sure I can adequately express them. I tend to talk myself into a circle and then decide that perhaps it's simply not for me to understand. Firstly, I should mention that the idea of the F/M/M ménage is not an issue (M/F/F probably would be. But another issue for another book). It's quite a compelling notion especially when you read the tenderness that is featured in the relationship and physical act. So, okay, I'm on board-in theory. Where I start to disengage is on an emotional level (or maybe the cerebral level). There's something good and naughty about the thought of a ménage but reading about the act makes me think, well, that there's someone sometimes left out or there's not enough of this or that to go around. I know these stories are told as a woman's fantasy with deep emotion, love and protection being paramount and I also understand that generally men might be less likely to engage in a M/M/F ménage. So this is fantasy, right? Ok, I get that. Still I can't shrug it off as such without thinking about what it would truly mean to be one of the participants. I don't proclaim to be an expert on men. In fact I'm as perplexed by them as one can be so it's hard for me to understand why guys might like (or heck even prefer) to share a single woman. Let's not get into men and monogamy, sharing multiple women or casual and promiscuous sex because frankly I don't have the strength. In this book we are dealing with committed, polyfaithful (polyamours) relationships. Simple, right? No way. I start thinking is that emasculating for one or both men? Then I wonder why would it be? I don't know! Is one more dominate? Am I thinking in terms of obsolete gender roles rather than letting people be who or whatever they are? Does it go against the primitive, dominance and possessiveness one so often reads about in Romance novels? I like that kind of guy in books. Do I see all men as those types because I read Romance novels? What exactly is the inducement (besides 'love') in this situation, particularly for the guys? Do guys share because it makes them feel empowered? Manly? Other? Is it possible to have two committed relationships? If the guys don't enjoy sex with one another, what kind of relationship do they have with each other? Rivalrous? Amicable? Loving? Is this lifestyle rife with jealousy or feelings of neglect? Perhaps no more than a traditional relationship but the opportunities seem more abundant. Is someone more or less being used or exploited (this might be a little of my F/F/M or non committed F/M/M bias). I guess I feel a little repressed after reading this. Or at least not as enlightening as I hoped I was. Still I can't quite wrap my mind around how the ménage situation is one in which two men would be healthy, genuine and content. Maybe the dudes don't matter since it's her fantasy after all, right? That's no way to think! Shame on me. So the circle of thoughts begin again and I am no closer to understanding than I was before. Illuminations, if you have them to share will be happily accepted.