This review will not include any spoilers but will give an honest opinion from a middle schooler's perspective of the book, The Creek, by Jennifer L. Holm. As a matter of fact, I vacillated between the ranking of 4-4.5. This book had a shaky beginning. Once I read the synopsis of the book I wasn't hooked immediately. I also wasn't positive that I was going to enjoy or even continue to read the book after the first chapter. However, once I got passed the first few chapters it got interesting. There are two main problems throughout this book that made me dislike it by a small amount.
Despite the fact that this is a small problem it did make my head turn. In the beginning of the book one of the characters was called three different names. I had to read over those few pages several times to understand. On page 3 it states, “‘Come on, Angus, let’s get moving!”’ a voice rang out. “It was Mac’s mother. She was the only one Penny had ever heard him call Angus and not be beaten to a pulp.” On top of that some people called him McHale which was his last name. I thought this was slightly confusing because there was one character being called three different names. At some points of the book I forgot that they were talking about the same character. Also, a few times I had to re-read to understand that the same character was being talked about. This made my rating go down minimally.
The next problem is a certain way the author broke down setting and time periods. In this book in particular I noticed that when the author writes and changes setting or time periods she uses three squares in a row to indicate this. An example of this is on page 11 it states, “ The hand in the car flicked a finger, as if dismissing her, and Penny leaped up and ran inside. Then after the indication using the three squares it said, “Penny’s family was already sitting at the breakfast table in the sunny yellow kitchen.” As you can see this may be confusing to some readers like me. Usually when I'm reading I don't look for signs because of the speed I'm reading at. Due to this I sometimes get confused on where I am in the book and what happened. This is because I don't notice the setting or time change. Then it just appears to me that the author jumped from one place/time to another. Instead of this the author could use a transition word or phrase so that the reader has a better understanding of what's going on.
On the other hand as you can see I gave it an above average rating. One reason for this was because of the content and storyline. I thought the author did an excellent job on the way the book was structured. Every part made sense and at the end I noticed why each part was put where it was. The sequence of events was perfectly placed and the information that went along with each part was great. On top of that, the way the author made all the events happen were very creative and I doubt they have been copied in other published books. For example, throughout the whole tenth chapter the events were followed one by another. Most events were caused by the one before. As you can see if the situations were put in any other order the story wouldn't make as much sense.
Another reason for the exemplary judgment is because of the hook and suspense. Most mysteries have an expected ending that most of the time the reader can figure out. With this novel I was on the edge of my seat the whole entire time and was shocked at the end because I had no clue it would end how it did. This mystery was about finding out who the killer was. By the end of the book there were many explanations running through my head. The killer was very unexpected and I had no clue that it would end how it did. Toward the end of chapter ten the author states,“‘It was you all along?”’ “she gasped.” This shows that the characters in the book were very surprised. They were shockes and didn't even think of this person to be the murderer. One of my biggest pet peeves for mystery books is to have an unexpected ending that no reader would have thought would happen. This is one reason why I loved this book so much. It had an effective ending that kept me thinking the whole entire time through the book even at slow parts.
As I analyzed the author's style and/or choices I give an honest opinion on whether or not it worked for the book. The way the author thought of these creative ways to make the characters seem real certainly worked for the book. An example of this is shown on page 3, “Mrs. McHale was a divorced mother. Mac’s dad had left years ago, and Penny never saw him around.” In this case you can see that the author makes relatable characters where the reader can connect to the characters in which they can feel the emotions and put themselves in the character's shoes. In this instance many people nowadays can relate to having no father around from a young age and only having a mother to do everything.
Analyses will also be made based on the characters to see if it had an impact on my attitude toward the book. The character played as Caleb is resembled as a horror movie figure. A big college student who is a rebel, breaks all the laws and is very mischievous. With the genre of a mystery there always has to be one rebellious character that is very suspicious. I liked this character because he was realistic and made the book come together as a whole. Also, usually in a story where there is a group of friends there are about four characters. In The Creek, there are six friends in one group. They all came out to be different which I enjoyed because there are many perspectives of each event/situation. The reader can now get a better understanding of different points of view.
Although I admired this friend group one thing I did dislike was that many decisions were just based on what Mac thought about the situation. Usually whatever Mac said would go with maybe one other person on his side. What annoyed me even more was that whenever Penny made a suggestion they wouldn't even consider it. This is shown on page 43, “‘Whatever,”’ “Mac said”. “‘Let's go,”’ “She took in the stubborn set of the boy's’ eyes, even Teddy’s.” “‘But Caleb-”’ “Penny said. Mac cut her off.“‘I'm sick of hearing about him, so just shut up. We’ve got a fort to build.” This quote displays Macs attitude towards Penny and proves that most of his decisions count. To add onto things if Penny were to tell them something that may not have seemed believable the boys would just dismiss it immediately without even putting it into thought. This seemed a bit sexist to me because she was the only girl that was part of the group and they didn't really respect her thoughts the same as the others. She wasn't really treated equally.
I would recommend this book to someone who enjoys a good mystery read and is at an older age where they can handle violence. Although it may start slow in the beginning, its intensity increases throughout the rest of the book. This will have the reader at the edge of their seat the whole time and will be thinking from start to finish. The characters may be deceiving and will put you in confusion at the end. Predictions can be made the whole time but may surprise you towards the ending.
The theme or big idea the reader can get out of this book is to always tell the truth. Otherwise you will regret something that you can't go back and change. In this mystery, Penny regrets something that she has done and doesn't tell anyone. She regrets her decision and is now very guilty. The reader will get a good lesson out of this book to never lie and also think about your actions before you perform. By reading this book you can have a better understanding about effects and consequences.
To conclude I believe this book was a very successful read. I recommend this book to someone who enjoys a good mystery and suspense, although the reader should be aware of a slow beginning for the first few chapters. Overall here was a sneak peek at the freaky yet sneaky book The Creek.