History hasn’t always been fair to females – they are either deemed as evil and feared, are barely discussed at all, or are glorified in an exaggerated manner (usually posthumously). There isn’t much middle-ground. The above deduction is certainly true of even the highest nobility and royalty. It can be argued that these high-ranking women are even more so victim to this displeasure as they are generally viewed as mere pawns rather than important in their own person. The medieval King Edward I’s daughters/princesses were quite active in the political sphere but somewhat forgotten in the history texts. Kelcey Wilson-Lee attempts to remedy this in, “Daughters of Chivalry: The Forgotten Princesses of King Edward Longshanks”.
“Daughters of Chivalry” is an ambitious piece highlighting the lives of King Edward I’s five daughters: Eleanora, Joanna, Margaret, Mary, and Elizabeth; aiming to bring all these women into the spotlight in both a macro and micro view. Wilson-Lee doesn’t stylize “Daughters of Chivalry” in a mini-biography manner and rather tells their lives intertwined with each other, their royal parents, and the country of England. In fact, “Daughters of Chivalry” occasionally offers too much background information and overwhelms with the big-picture view causing instances of difficulty remembering content.
Wilson-Lee strives to make the academic and scholarly “Daughters of Chivalry” more readable with a highly visual and illustrative prose (Wilson-Lee would be tremendous at penning a historical-fiction piece) which is sometimes too flowery (depending on reader preferences). That being said, Wilson-Lee doesn’t dummy down the material and sticks to heavy research and history.
“Daughters of Chivalry” does fall victim to inconsistency issues: jumping back-and-forth in chronology, repetition, and a pattern of passages with an abundance of details flowing into none and then an overload once more. Wilson-Lee also tends to make speculative statements in the realm of “must have…” and “probably” and assumptions on thoughts and emotions. Equally cringe-worthy is Wilson-Lee’s habit of referencing/quoting literature and folklore from the period as credible fact sources in order to back her arguments. This has no place in a history text.
Negatives aside; “Daughters of Chivalry” sticks out from the history crowd by eschewing a straight recap/retelling angle and instead offers a psychological social/character study and a philosophical breakdown of all the events and actions being taken by and surrounding the princesses. This is penned in an educated, unbiased manner and certainly gives the reader “food for thought” rather than just regurgitating facts.
Also noteworthy, is the scope of information Wilson-Lee procured about the lives of the princesses. Generally, when authors set out to portrait the lives of lesser-known figures; they are met with the challenge of insufficient records which molds a fluffy piece full of filler content that is hardly about the main subject, at all. That is far from the reality of “Daughters of Chivalry” which is mind-blowingly packed with information and detail. Plus, Wilson-Lee does well focusing on each daughter in equal measures and doesn’t favor one over another.
In the concluding chapters of “Daughters of Chivalry”, Wilson-Lee presents an even more concrete look at the five daughters of King Edward I and pinpoints such in-depth movements; that the reader’s emotions are heightened and the pace of the text is almost that of a theatrical narrative. Wilson-Lee also introduces the drama that begins to turn with the reign of King Edward II and how this effects/will affect his princess sisters. The downfall is that Wilson-Lee brushes over (in comparison to the former portions of text) the deaths of King Edward I, any of the princesses, etc. The justifiable excuse is the absence of records surrounding any of these deaths but there is still a clear void in “Daughters of Chivalry”.
Wilson-Lee rounds out “Daughters of Chivalry” with a strong Epilogue detailing the legacies left behind by each of the five daughters providing a firm and memorable finality. Also included are annotated notes, s elect biography, and 16-pages of full-color photo plates.
“Daughters of Chivalry” is an astounding work in that it introduces lesser-discussed figures and explodes the barriers that have shadowed them to this point. Readers truly get a sense for the daughters, the family of King Edward I, and of the time period; while growing emotionally attached and bargaining a connection to the five princesses. Unlike other contemporary works on figures without solid records; “Daughters of Chivalry” is not fluffy or thin. Yes, the piece is not perfect and has some weaknesses in losing the thesis and resorting to speculation but “Daughters of Chivalry” merits a read and is recommended for all readers interested in King Edward I, his daughters, English monarchial history, and the medieval time period.