Up until now the vein of James Branch Cabell I’ve been tapping has been one of, well, not pure fantasy exactly, but of ironic fantasy: fantasy that is stylish, erudite and not necessarily entirely serious. It’s a vein that I have thoroughly enjoyed and that I hope I might explore further. Frankly, it fits my nature better than your standard high fantasy.
Chivalry does not belong in that mode: it is a set of historical romances - almost, bar the odd, rare, deadpan Cabellism, entirely serious, allegedly translated from the work of one Nicholas de Caen, with one or two quite well integrated pieces of poetry set in each one. Presumably it’s good poetry, presumably in authentic mediaeval form – I wouldn’t presume to judge on either score. Don’t expect a Jurgen or a Figures of Earth, you won’t get one.
Now that doesn’t mean it isn’t well-written, which it is for the most part, nor clever. I don’t think Cabell was capable of writing anything that wasn’t at least in some way clever, and what he’s going for here is drama in earnest. Personally, I miss his slyness, his light juggling of learned references, but that’s me. You may be more serious-minded.
Of course, if you are serious-minded there is a slight problem with Cabell’s scheme. In theory the book is a Dizain (Cabell liked the word) des Reines: specifically it looks like it was conceived as a run of ten tales featuring (starring or co-starring) a chronological sequence of queens of England running from Eleanor of Provence (Mrs Henry III) to Catherine of Valois (Mrs Henry V), dealing with themes of love, honour, duty and pride. There is, for the historically aware and anyone else nerdy enough to look this up, a slight snag with the setup in that that’s actually nine queens, not ten. It might have been interesting to read Cabell’s version of Margaret of Anjou (Mrs Henry VI); instead he inserted a different lady in the sequence.
There is a second snag, if you happen to like neat patterns (I like things neat sometimes): Anne of Austria is a mere mention in one of the stories, not a character in her own right. I don’t pretend to know why this is the case, but it irks me. And I have to say that the best of the stories give at least equal billing to the queen. They are, I think, enhanced a little if you know something of the history he’s taking liberties with.
I think I’ll call this one a moderate-to-high three.