I've read a few books in the genre of historical detective fiction, and in the sub-category of ancient Roman mysteries Lindsey Davis's books rule (in my opinion) supreme. Her Falco and Flavia novels effectively mix the gumshoe pulp fiction stereotypes with literate history and a range of personable characters, thus forming a considerable corpus of good reads. They are good yarns that have that special mix of scholarship & anachronistic fun, giving the reader the best of both worlds.
Sadly, Marilyn Todd appears to be far below Davis's standards, and whilst I will continue to read her Claudia series, ''I Claudia' is a most inauspicious start. Todd has not met the standards of those like Davis, nor Wishart nor Saylor, and to be blunt in comes down to her crude prose.
I don't mean crude in terms of sexual explicitness; no, Todd write crudely, simplistically, without much grace or charm. Todd rarely escapes her limited capabilities, whether that be in terms of plot, characterisation or historical 'truthfulness'. There is a kernel of a good idea herein; a feminist anti-hero with street smarts, moving through the dark underworld of ancient Roman society. However Todd fails to make more of Claudia, more of her setting, more of her narrative because she can't go to the next levels of fictional imagination and complexity.
Perhaps the major problem with the book, or at least the one that really annoyed me, was that her anti-heroine Claudia is all surface, too flat and one dimensional. There should be more humanity to her character but almost always Todd just throws in line after line of cynicism and ego. Some may claim this is a good thing, to see a strong female character not conforming to accepted norms (whether they be what the reader wants or the characters in the novel project). However one can still develop a strong female character who also engages with the reader and interacts with her fellow characters in ways that one can appreciate, enjoy, empathise with. Helena Justina in the Falco novels by Lindsay Davis is just such an example. Instead, Todd's Claudia is all sour vinegar, dislikeable, solitary. What should be the key relationship in the book, her duelling with the investigator Orbilio, becomes just passage after passage of nastiness. And this repulsion from her of him is mirrored by his crude lust for her.
I could talk more of how non-historical the book is, how little I enjoyed it from other perspectives. Bottom line is this is not a good book and Todd needs to do better with her prose and her characters. Hopefully this happens in the next book in the Claudia series.