Here are some passages I highlighted:
"[Quoting John Frame] 'People make things because they already have a plan in view, a purpose, a goal, an ideal. The ideal comes first, then making things... So now we can see how culture is related to religion. When we talk of values and ideals, we are talking of religion.' ... Culture then is 'religion externalised' - it's how we show on the outside what we believe on the inside. Culture is how we worship - it's the way in which we show what is really valuable to our hearts"
"In Christ, culture is our calling. Our new identity of being 'in Christ' encompasses everything: 'Whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do it all for the glory of God' (1 Corinthians 10 v 31). The gospel of Jesus Christ confronts, reclaims and builds culture in a wonderful variety of ways, but which all conform to God's norms and for his glory. As we are those who are united to Christ, his story of relating to culture becomes ours. It's a wonderful story because ultimately it's about re-creation. It's about life and human flourishing and being part of a new world order, as Paul declares in 2 Corinthians 5 v 17: 'Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: the old has gone, the new is here!'"
"Most Christians are rightly concerned about the increasing sexualisation of our culture, but what about the sentimentalisation of our culture? Sentimentality is emotional self-indulgence, so that what you feel becomes most important. We often see it in the public reation to the death of a celebrity. While apparently well-meaning, sentimentality is actually selfish. It directs our emotions to our own emotions, so we are always the main character of our story. Although it pretends to care for the 'other', it really only cares for the self - the 'other' merely becomes a means to an end (feeling something). Sentimentality allows us to experience shared public emotional expression, without the commitment of real-life relationships... The sentimental world consists of clear cuts: of goodies and baddies, victims and perpetrators...
Now doesn't this describe a myriad of reality TV shows and kids' 'comedies' on the Disney Channel and Nickelodeon? We might think these types of shows are pretty innocent... because they aren't full of sex, swearing and violence. But they are sickly senimental and have a rotting effect, because they present a fantastical fake world which encourages us to feel in cliches. Or consider The Greatest Showman. At one level it is a family film with a feel-good message and a catchy soundtrack. But its 'feel-goodness' is part of the problem: it's all too easy. Things get patched up far too quickly with an emotional song, as the characters go back to dancing with CGI tigers at the end. Real life is messier."
"Our reason for watching or not watching something needs to be grace focused. We should be way about any rationale for 'No' that puts imperatives (e.g. be holy) before indicatives (e.g. you are holy in Christ). This order matters. If I'm saved by grace alone, then the motive behind my cultural choices is not to keep rules to somehow impress God or prove myself worthy but to love and honour God because of what he's already done for me... [In addition, in this debate about what to watch] there's an angst about the survival of the church, or the risk of losing one's personal faith [that doesn't sit right, because]... if we're saved by grace, then it's all of God. He is sovereign, and he's got control of the ship; no TV show can steer us into an iceberg when our Father's at the helm."
"In the 'Can I watch debate' one of the reasons we might be willing to put up with unhelpful aspects of a particular TV show or film is the pay-off of what's good about it: the amazing skill in complex and subtle storytelling and screenplays, or incredible artistic world-building which makes us gasp. I'd like to ask some hard questions here: Could it be that because our own cultural cupboards are bare, our starving imaginations are forced to live off the world's scraps? Are we always consuming culture and never creating it? Why aren't we telling better stories with all the same realism, imagination, subtlety, complexity and beauty, but without those aspects which make it difficult and unhelpful for us? Why aren't we strategically locating, discipling, resourcing and sending out Christians gifted in the arts and the media?... Ask yourself... how could you carve out time to do more calcultural creation? How might you encourage your brothers and sisters to do the same?"
On the gospel confronting culture: "When it comes to our own discipleship, we're equally tempted to change what Jesus requires of his followers so that our lives can look more like those of the non-Christians around us - to make our values look more like the world's."
Not a quote but a summary of quite a bit: the gospel is subversive fulfillment of culture because it confronts culture but also connects to it: the gospel shows that the world's stories are useless and harmful, but also shows that the gospel is worthy of our hopes and desires.
On Paul in Athens ("he was greatly distressed to see that the city was full of idols" - Acts 17:16): "As we look across our communities and our nation, do we have that passion for God's glory? Are we grieved that idolatry tramples all over it? Or have we become desensitised?"