Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Great Books, Bad Arguments: "Republic", "Leviathan", and "The Communist Manifesto"

Rate this book
Why Plato, Hobbes, and Marx are great ― despite their arguments

Plato's Republic , Hobbes's Leviathan , and Marx's Communist Manifesto are universally acknowledged classics of Western political thought. But how strong are the core arguments on which they base their visions of the good society that they want to bring into being? In this lively and provocative book, W. G. Runciman shows where and why they fail, even after due allowance has been made for the different historical contexts in which they wrote. Plato, Hobbes, and Marx were all passionately convinced that justice, peace, and order could be established if only their teachings were implemented and the right people put into power. But Runciman makes a powerful case to the effect that all three were irredeemably naive in their assumptions about how human societies function and evolve and how human behavior could be changed. Yet despite this, Runciman insists that Republic , Leviathan , and The Communist Manifesto remain great books. Born of righteous anger and frustration, they are masterfully eloquent pleas for better worlds―worlds that Plato, Hobbes, and Marx cannot bring themselves to admit to be unattainable.

144 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2010

6 people are currently reading
43 people want to read

About the author

W.G. Runciman

27 books4 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
3 (25%)
4 stars
6 (50%)
3 stars
2 (16%)
2 stars
1 (8%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Stephanie.
34 reviews
January 10, 2015
A great quick read and way to exercise that political theory muscle in my head that was starting to atrophy. Not an introduction for people who haven't read Plato, Hobbes or Marx.
Displaying 1 of 1 review