Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Very Last Interview

Rate this book
"The Very Last Interview is a unique work, a lacerating self-examination that came about when David decided to gather every interview he ever did, going back nearly 40 years. If it was radio or TV, he transcribed it. He wasn't sure what he was looking for, but he knew he wasn't interested in any of his own answers. The questions interested him - approximately 2,700, which he collated and cut down to form 22 chapters focused on subjects that include Process, Childhood, Failure, Capitalism, Suicide, and Comedy. Then, according to Shields, "the real work began: rewriting and editing and remixing the questions and finding a throughline." It's a ruthless self-dismantling in which the author, in this case, a late middle-aged white man, is strangely, thrillingly, not present. As Chuck Klosterman wrote about the book: "Logic suggests that people are best understood through the things they say, but that's not how the media usually work. People are actually defined by the questions they get asked (and the degree to which their answers can be framed to prove whatever was already assumed to be true).The Very Last Interview is David Shields doing what he has brilliantly done for the past twenty-five years: interrogating his own intellectual experience by changing the meaning of what seems both obviously straightforward and obviously wrong." The Very Last Interview is a sequel to Shields's seminal Reality Hunger: A Manifesto, which Literary Hub recently named one of the most important books of the last decade. As Kenneth Goldsmith says, "Just when you think Shields couldn't rethink and reinvent literature any further, he does it again. The Very Last Interview confirms Shields as the most dangerously important American writer since Burroughs.""--

1 pages, Audio CD

First published January 1, 2022

6 people are currently reading
161 people want to read

About the author

David Shields

72 books264 followers
David Shields is the author of fourteen books, including Reality Hunger (Knopf, 2010), which was named one of the best books of 2010 by more than thirty publications. GQ called it "the most provocative, brain-rewiring book of 2010"; the New York Times called it "a mind-bending manifesto." His previous book, The Thing About Life Is That One Day You'll Be Dead (Knopf, 2008), was a New York Times bestseller. His other books include Black Planet: Facing Race During an NBA Season, a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award; Remote: Reflections on Life in the Shadow of Celebrity, winner of the PEN/Revson Award; and Dead Languages: A Novel, winner of the PEN Syndicated Fiction Award. His essays and stories have appeared in the New York Times Magazine, Harper's, Yale Review, Believer, Village Voice, Salon, Slate, McSweeney's, and Utne Reader; he's written reviews for the New York Times Book Review, Los Angeles Times Book Review, Boston Globe, and Philadelphia Inquirer. His work has been translated into fifteen languages.

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
18 (20%)
4 stars
36 (40%)
3 stars
29 (32%)
2 stars
4 (4%)
1 star
1 (1%)
Displaying 1 - 30 of 31 reviews
Profile Image for Eric.
175 reviews37 followers
May 16, 2022
Thank you to New York Review Books for providing me with a copy of this book in exchange for my honest review.

You are now able to purchase this book anywhere you purchase books.

This book was not bad. Actually, I quite enjoyed it.

The premise of it is that Shields transcribed every interview he ever did but removed the parts in which he talked and only left in the parts of the interviewer talking.

It actually made it a bit more interesting. Because it makes you infer on what Shields would respond to the question. Would he be annoyed? Angry? Upset? Elated? We don't know.

Some questions made me so mad at how an interview has the idea in their brain to say something so horrible, some made me laugh out loud, and some just made my jaw drop.

There were some moments that I had to underline because it was just so funny or ridiculous.
"Are you, in essence, a ghost?"


Like what kind of question is that? Simply ridiculous. Or some that made my blood literally boil because I've had people ask me the same thing like:

"You weren't raised in a gulag or Nazi Germany or by wolves. When are you going to grow up, some may ask."


As a Jew myself, questions like this literally make me fume. This diminishing question that people think they won't offend.

While I did find some parts to be funny and some parts to be annoying, I do think that this book deserves some editing. Some parts could have for sure been left out. Which would slightly reduce the actuality of these interviews by redacting aspects of it, but would make it better if it was just ... cut out.

Editing definitely should have been done a bit more here, which does slightly reduce the rating of this. It just threw off the pacing and interest.

all in all: actually really good. for the interview/nonfiction lovers. 3.5 stars
Profile Image for michal k-c.
875 reviews116 followers
May 25, 2022
frustrating and weird little memoir where the only active voice is anonymous interlocutors and interviewers, all of the actual “memoir” taking place in the negative space. formally: a success
Profile Image for Kat.
47 reviews1 follower
May 4, 2022
are all writers bottoms?
Profile Image for Simon Robs.
503 reviews100 followers
April 26, 2022
Three stars means I liked it, it was good and worth reading especially if you've read his (or some) of his other books, know his "schtick" -of sorts AND all the writerly/writer allusions sprinkled generously throughout. I don't think he had to work too hard at this book once the format was layed out - listing previously asked interview Q's that then lead to cultural/ philosophical/ metaphysical aspects of consideration to latest summation of collected nothings [in] particular. It reads in less than two hours and doesn't digress more than needed, but if this is last what comes next?
Profile Image for Simon Sweetman.
Author 13 books65 followers
September 26, 2022
Very good fun. As a (former) interviewer I winced at times, but mostly remembered that the interview isn't about the interviewer. Something that should be remembered a whole lot more often. This is a funny, weird little contrived absentee autobiography; an autobiography of what the work is alleged to stand for. Really enjoyed the ideas that swirl in here.
Profile Image for Meg Tuite.
Author 48 books127 followers
May 8, 2022
I actually got nauseous reading some of the questions asked of the brilliant, lit, inimitable David Shields! Here are a few:
"Are you, in effect, a dead man walking?"
"Seven agents but only one wife? Interesting."
"Another way to ask this is, are all writers "bottoms"?
"Are you a self-terrorist"
"You may be weary of this line of questioning, but why do you keep writing about the same material over and over?"
"Essay" or therapy?

Absolutely blows my mind and yet, when considering humanity and what regurgitates out of their mouths, I am sad and disgusted and wonder how we let these idiots spray their spew! OMG!
Profile Image for Tom.
1,165 reviews
August 4, 2022
A funny and depressing “memoir” of a sort based not on Shields’s disquisitions about his life but on the interviewers’ presumptions about Shields’s life. For The Very Last Interview, Shields extracted 2,000+ questions from 40 years of interviews with him, which he then organized into categories. The results are appalling for what they reveal about the character of the questioners and their seeming refusal to accept Shields’s own explanations for, say, his motivations, rather than those they came to the interview with. What the interviews presume to tell us is that Shields is a depressive Jew whose career has been on the skids for the past 20 years or so and whose life, at every point, has been haunted and debilitated by stuttering.

The Very Last Interview is an extended exercise in bad rhetoric and bad faith: Most questions have only “yes” or “no” as their answer, many of which also serve as leading questions, since the “correct” answer is already embedded in the questions themselves. At any point the interviewers receive answers contrary to their expectations, they are more interested in discrediting Shields’s opinion than they are in revising their own. Apart from their unwarranted assumptions, the questions also vary from the impertinent to invasive to insulting, and all are utterly asinine and inane.

If your books aren’t really seeing anymore—which more or less means that you no longer have a readership—then why, exactly, are you still writing them?

On Shields’s athletic adolescence and its sudden end:

Your broken leg—kind of a convenient excuse, don’t you think?”
It’s not as if you were destined to be Seabiscuit and then, after the broken leg, you suddenly became Stephen Hawking, is it?
There’s that hoary cliché about how sports teach people focus and hard work and discipline; you’re not going there, are you?”

On the quality of Shields’s teaching:

Ever taught a truly great course?
How about a single really excellent class?
How about a genuinely meaningful one-on-one conference with a student?
Perhaps you view teaching as nothing more than a day job?
A sinecure?
What’s your salary?
Seriously?
Seems to me a poor expenditure of taxpayers’ dollars, since what do the residents of the state actually get as a result?

On the trajectory of Shields’s career:

But you’re too old to change your life in any substantive way, wouldn’t you agree?
So—not to put too fine a point on it—has it been as wasted life?

Who wouldn’t be a depressive misanthrope dealing with such idiots? Back in 1960s, the cultural critic Dwight McDonald coined the phrase “phosphorescent quotation,” which for him signaled a new turn in American humor, a turn based not on traditional jokes or exaggeration but on straight-faced quotation of statements that are prima facie absurd to begin with—such as Eisenhower’s tautology, “Things are more like today than they’ve ever been before.” In that regard, The Very Last Interview emphatically glows.

For more of my reviews, please see https://www.thebookbeat.com/backroom/...

Profile Image for Steve.
1,058 reviews11 followers
May 25, 2022
I have been reading Shields since his first novel, "Heroes" (1984). Iowa, basketball, and an award winner - it interested me. I have read him off and on ever since. I have seen him have highs and lows. But, looking over the complete list of his titles in the front of this book, I realized I have not really enjoyed anything he has written ever since "Remote" (1996) - his fourth book, out of 22.
OK, really, the tough part is *answering* questions, not asking them. And it is obvious that many (most?) of these questions are ones he has asked/developed himself, not asked by others, s the book claims.
He presents himself as a bit of a loner, loose cannon, iconoclast, Post-Modern New Journalist - honestly it felt more like jottings. I know he spent time organizing these questions, not only into each chapter, but into an order within the chapter as well, but it does not seem to add much. Scattered. Rather light weight. Not the kind of thing that earns one a "Genius" grant, let alone a Nobel. (Well, we can all dream....)
And many of the "questions" are kind of like inside jokes. I have the feeling that the only way we'd know the answer to many of the questions here ("Did they really say that?" "Was that really in the email?") is if we not only read all 22 of his books (a dark hole I'll never go down), but his other ancillary work as well.
Dropping an author (or, in some cases, authors) name, and then brushing it aside with a quick, pithy remark reminds me of the line, "Opinions are like a**holes - everyone has one." It is not "criticism". Obviously well read, it is like he is incapable of sharing what he has learned from his reading with others. And I was somewhat aghast at the authors he identified himself with in terms of talent. Hubris. Or the authors he brands as only having medium talent (for example, his list of fellow stutterers who write).
"Asked" if he has added anything to literature or pedagogy, he kind of implies that he has - but never actually shares with us with that was.
And, well, 40 years ago I learned to distrust people who wear the badge of "I don't own a TV", and use the word "copacetic".
The good thing is this book really reads quickly. The bad thing is that over the 2 evenings it took me to read it, by the end of the evening I was anxious to be done with it. And rather bored.
But honestly, I find his jottings entertaining enough that I would not be surprised to find myself reading another of his books somewhere down the line.
2 out of 5 = "It was OK".
Profile Image for David Partikian.
314 reviews30 followers
November 13, 2022
David Shields is an author who continues to fall under the radar of most readers despite a strong literary output. He seems to have painted himself into a corner with his seminal manifesto, Reality Hunger, 2010, which is a response to his view that the modern novel has become irrelevant, a view he has been asked to develop or defend ad nauseam.

Reality Hunger is a collection of unattributed quotes from different people. His publisher’s legal advisors forced Shields to give quotation credit at the end of the work, but—nevertheless—it stands as a manifesto of quotes as literature sui generis and as a life philosophy that incorporates influences from a wide realm of sources. It is eminently readable. Art as sound bites if you will. This technique, like Burroughs at his best or Kathy Acker at her best, works way better than any synopsis by me or another critic can make an eloquent clarification.

After a couple of minor works that are worthy reads, but which were remaindered almost immediately, Shields returns with a brilliant compendium piece to Reality Hunger, a small volume in which he reprints and organizes questions that he has been asked in interviews over his career. Only the questions and, most emphatically, not the answers. Shields’ silence is deafening and the result is an utterly brilliant and quick read which allows an author, even one who knows next to nothing about Shields, to learn all about him merely by reading the questions—often inane and pompous ones—that he has been asked over his career. The book is a statement on how an interviewer’s preconceived conceptions can lead an interview or frame an individual in a manner that the interviewer feels is “true”; Like Reality Hunger, The Very Last Interview is a manifesto on what is genuine, but by example and not via a pontificating, jargon-ejaculating philosopher. I could imagine the book being taught in an Intro to Law seminar or on rhetorical techniques.

Again, trying to clarify an artist who uses a collage or montage technique, particularly for literature, is difficult. The clarification will often sound trite. This slim volume published by NYRB most emphatically is not. Shields bares his life with excruciating honesty—as he is apt to do—but only insofar as others judge or classify him. The result has so many implications that a competent review or critique of the book would be at least threefold the length of The Very Last Interview.
1,579 reviews39 followers
July 21, 2022
This was different. I guess the title lured me in at the library, but it might mean more to someone who has read his novels. Premise is that it's a compilation, organized by topic (capitalism, school, art,.........) of questions he has been asked in interviews, omitting his answers. Jacket copy alludes to his "rewriting and editing and remixing the questions and finding a through-line". Well, remixing is fine, but if you're rewriting and editing, then we don't know that these are actual interview questions you were asked, and some of them read as unbelievably rude or clueless.

So maybe better to think of it as a creative writer's experimentation with the offbeat form of trying to say something (usually sardonic) by projecting himself into the role of interviewer of the author. Results occasionally striking -- i gather he stutters, and some of the related questions were thoughtful -- but often boring, or over my head at least. What is he getting at with, for instance,

Do you like breathing?
Yes or no? (p. 95)

Might have to be on psilocybin to get into that and give it a lot of careful attention.
Profile Image for Josh Sherman.
212 reviews10 followers
January 11, 2025
In the tradition of Joe Brainard, Georges Perec, Édouard Levé, and — more recently Sheila Heti and Jesse Ball — Shields creates a cohesive text (I imagine he'd call it a collage) out of seemingly disparate sentences about himself. Unlike other entries in the form, though, these sentences are culled from interviews Shields participated in over the past 40 years and are not statements from him but rather questions posed to him by interviewers. Interestingly, I'd argue it's no less revealing about the subject despite this self-imposed distance. Decisions about what to include were made, for example. I enjoy how sometimes the questions are actually answers and also the weight of things left unsaid, which this work does a good job of capturing. It's also, to me, a nice skewering of the interview process itself, which is, of course, self-serving for authors but, as we see here, journalists as well. Anyways, the 40mg of Vyvanse I ingested 20 minutes ago has yet to kick in and out of concern of my own unmedicated incoherence, I'll stop here.
Profile Image for Glen Helfand.
447 reviews15 followers
December 17, 2022
Did David Sheilds write the flap copy to this formal autobiographical exercise? I mean, how could these questions be things that interviewers actually asked him? Does he think anyone will believe that? Isn't, though, his m.o. to question the veracity of the subjective? That being the case, can't we just view this as another form of self-interrogation and maybe self-absorption? Don't you find it interesting how we can appreciate a writer's adventurousness of form, but not necessarily their deceptively neurotic writing persona?

And why did I think it would be a good idea to give my take on this book in its own form? Do I think I'm really that clever?
Profile Image for Neil Griffin.
238 reviews22 followers
July 21, 2023
A really fun one-sitting book. Think of it like the inverse of Joe Brainerd's "I Remember" or Édouard Levé's "Autoportrait", where instead of making a series of declarative statements from which you get a sense of the writer's soul, you instead get incessant questions, one after the other, apparently many cribbed or remixed from interviews in his past, which, entertainingly and paradoxically, answers a lot of questions about his life and place in our literary culture.

Also for admirers of David Markson, who Shields name checks several times in this.
Profile Image for Jon Kapp.
63 reviews3 followers
April 2, 2023
Quickly the reader becomes acutely aware that questions are never just that. Questions, are in fact, statements - or presumptions - especially as they are presented here - and loaded with judgement and intention.

Shields leaves the reader of The Very Last Interview with an interesting picture of the subject (himself) through these questions. But with no answers provided, we also have great space for interpretation drawn from our own imaginations....
Profile Image for Chris.
646 reviews12 followers
Read
July 31, 2022
Very funny. A collection of interrogatories directed at the author throughout his career. Together, they cast a shadow more on the critic, the audience, the questioner, than the subject. Who are we? What do we, can we, see?
Profile Image for Ricky.
6 reviews2 followers
Read
November 9, 2022
I thought this book was incredible. Just the way it was structured is very unique and artistic. It’s like a collage of different answers and interviews stitched together to present one unique story about the man behind the pen.
1 review1 follower
April 5, 2022
Read Shields
Start Here
Profile Image for Leslie.
686 reviews6 followers
Want to read
April 19, 2022
"21 new books hitting shelves this week," Lit Hub, 4/12/22
Profile Image for Reagan Kapasi.
706 reviews4 followers
May 13, 2022
Love the concept of author compiling all the questions he was asked in his career and putting them into thematic chapters. Very clear intention, super fascinating.
Profile Image for Kent Winward.
1,794 reviews65 followers
May 14, 2022
Was this book fun for you?

Do you read Shields often?

Profile Image for Jules.
4 reviews2 followers
June 29, 2022
When do you disagree with a question?
Profile Image for Christa Van.
1,697 reviews2 followers
August 10, 2022
Lots of fun to read. A compilation of questions the author has been asked in interviews.
Profile Image for Carlton Moore.
351 reviews2 followers
September 13, 2022
“Are not our lives too short for that full utterance which through all our stammering is of course our only and abiding intention?”
Profile Image for Nav.
1,440 reviews1 follower
January 9, 2023
Somehow both a masterful demonstration of the power of silence as well as the written equivalent of a collage.
Profile Image for p.
148 reviews2 followers
May 13, 2023
no plot just vibes
Profile Image for Sarah.
89 reviews1 follower
July 7, 2023
Very funny and thought provoking, but the reader has to know the world of writing workshops and literary icons in order to understand the questions Shields uses to decimate contemporary culture.
Profile Image for Andrew.
Author 2 books2 followers
December 4, 2023
Neat and quick to read. A question tells as much about the person asking it as it does about the person answering.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 31 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.