Sad but true.
Looking at such a provocative book cover, I tend to be wary of these books, as I suspect the authors mix fact with fiction to generate sensationalism. Any doubts I had, quickly evaporated after going through the first pages. This is a compelling, well-researched socio-political history of plastic surgery. It is factual, and comprehensive and is the go-to seminal book on this topic. No other book can outperform it, and it would make an intriguing subject for a TV documentary.
What do Kinsey, Sanger, Nietzsche, Machiavelli and Marx have in common? No, they’re not just the influencers in Benjamin Wiker’s book, “Ten books that screwed the world”. It has something to do with man’s astounding penchant for social engineering. Or maybe, it is about the dehumanization of man into a chess pawn piece for life’s powerplay. Or maybe, man is the screen icon whose personality can be rebooted and programmed with a few taps on a keyboard.
A modern-day re-run of Shakespeare’s “As you like it” opens with the lines: All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players, they have their exits and their entrances….
Act I: It always starts with a misplaced idea, that is always tried on the vulnerable, the disenfranchised, and the minorities.
Kinsey studied the sexual habits of insects and applied them to humans. He used prisoners as subjects for his much-lauded but flawed, unscientific studies.
Darwin studied animal species with his theory of natural selection. Nietzsche applied Darwin’s theories to humankind. His social Darwinism created the theory of the overman, a concept embraced by the Nazi party, and put it into practice on a national scale. Sanger was so impressed by the Nazi eugenic policy that she adopted it, through her brainchild, Planned Parenthood. Like Kinsey, she advocated it for the minorities, low-lifers, and the disenfranchised.
Act II: In comes, Machiavelli with his twin diktat, ”One who deceives will always find those who allow themselves to be deceived”, and, “Politics have no relation to morals”, with his three-headed prince. The unholy trinity of 1) sanctimonious politicians and the pliant judiciary, 2) the media spearheaded by Hollywood, and 3) the market forces (the pharmaceutical companies, the medical profession, the powerful porn industry, the cosmetic companies, etc ). The three-headed prince craves power—the politician, power of votes; the fourth estate, power over man’s emotions; the market forces, power over man’s purse. All three heads treat man as an object—a ballot paper, a lump of plasticine, and a consumer respectively.
Act III: In comes the author of “Das Capital”, another end-product of the German enlightenment. His economic idea is applied to human behaviour, and it thereby morphs into a politics of envy with the socialist aim of equality. The three-headed prince enforces this politics of envy in daily life. A demi-god is held up as a role model, whom people aspire to equal because they envy the god and want to be his equal. The prince preys upon and exploits man’s weaknesses, vulnerabilities, passions, and vanities in the interest of power. They gaze upon the caged mouse happily spinning in his vicious circle of supply and demand. They look down smugly because man is happy with his Panem et circenses. The votes keep coming in for the politicians, the media’s influence increases through population mind control, and the money keeps rolling in for the market forces. They have a common cause, and all players are happy, though enslaved by the fire of their passions. The prince delights in fanning these flames.
Act IV: All the actors come together for the rousing finale.
What follows is the apotheosis of Kinsey and Sanger by the fourth estate. Hollywood leads the charge tugging at the heartstrings by creating a cause celebre out of an exception. The secular high priests and priestesses of the government misquote scripture and beatify sexual perversions into sex education, and the eugenics of the feminine overman into reproductive rights. Then, the parents of the sexual revolution are canonized as the father of sex education and the mother of feminism. With the help of the judiciary, the exception is turned into the rule, and national policy is turned on its head. That is the signal for the media to unleash their measures to oversexualize the people, thereby increasing the demand to satisfy the multi-headed prince. That includes the demand for plastic surgery in both males and females to improve their sexual attractiveness, and to engender even more envy. And on it goes…
Reading this book, the strategy for the promotion of plastic surgery is the same. A bizarre idea by Levin/ Maltz; experimentation on the low-lifers; fake, unscientific studies; Judge Kross spearheads the policy; the politicians misquote scripture to define beauty and ugliness; Glitzy Hollywood takes up the cause of corrective surgery; the politicians support the policy and fund it; Revlon butts in to reap the profits….
I see uncanny parallels with the abortion story, as life is sacrificed in honour of the goddess Aphrodite. Maybe the West will contracept themselves out of existence, like the ancient pagan civilizations offering human sacrifices to appease the insatiable appetite of their demanding gods.
The author has done a sterling job with this opus. Imagine the time and determination to collate and verify this mass of data. it’s a pity she didn’t write this book in the twenties. Maybe, we could have averted the tragedy of the sixties. But, would it have done so?
Didn’t Mark Twain say,” History doesn’t repeat itself. It rhymes”. And then, from across the pond, Bismarck replied, “What we learn from history is that no one learns from history.” And Margaret Sanger’s Hitler agreed, “Who remembers the Armenians…”
What I particularly like about the author is her writing style. From time to time, she actually “shows not tells” through the use of dialogue, giving her script a personal feel, even though she is dispassionate throughout. The story speaks for itself, and the pictures help bring it alive, adding an element of authenticity. She concentrates on stating the facts as they are and respects the reader so much, that she allows him to draw his own conclusions. Even if they may be those of a narrow-minded, dastardly bigot like me. It’s a welcome relief from the incessant brainstorming by her colleagues in the media with a self-serving agenda.