Given that journalism is not simply a recounting of the events that occurred during a day, but an information source that is budgeted, biased and blinkered; the why and the how of news communication is a complex issue. This book initially struggles through its introduction in an attempt to touch upon all the issues, but once it focuses on some particular case studies, the author finds herself on more solid ground.
Why does one story get more play than another? What are the stages of coverage? Why do some humanitarian disasters prompt more donations than others? Why is so much journalism built on lazy metaphors? And is it creating a less compassionate, less informed, nationalistic audience as a result? How much do production costs determine what we hear about in the world? How much does the availability of pictures determine how long we hear of it?
Yes, the answers may be as simple as you might expect, but seeing them demonstrated, and hearing them at work in the words of the news creators, is a worthwhile exercise.
Susan D. Moeller concludes Compassion Fatigue with an antidote that affirms the importance of stories like Joseph's personal story, and the importance of having him speak in schools, churches, to service groups--anywhere people are willing to hear and learn from him.
"We need to be put in as close contact as possible with people at risk. We need nuanced and in-depth coverage of crises and we need to hear and see the human side too. The former without the later is boring, the latter without the former is sensationalized. To get it right, the media need to think of both the short term and the logn term. They need to think of both their own interests and the 'public interest.'" (321)
Interesting book on how American media fails in covering international tragedy. This was written in 1999, but the patterns that emerge in reporting on war, genocide, famine, and the like, are still in place today.