I’m going to have to disagree with a majority of the other reviews for this book.
I can understand how people found the blurb misleading, which spoke of a ‘charismatic man’ & ‘traditional love narratives’ which actually wasn’t what this book was about at all. This is a book about abuse: & not the kind where the narcissist can hide in plain sight by putting on a charming front, where the love is toxic but overpowering. This is about a straight up actual crazy man inserting himself into a young woman’s life after relentlessly stalking her, & taking advantage of her confusion & passivity to gaslight her into a ‘relationship’ which she barely even perceives as such but doesn’t know how to escape. Rape is implied multiple times, & he grooms & abuses her & follows her across the country, all while friends & family are too uncomfortable to intervene (that passivity being the secondary ‘villain’ of this story).
People rated this poorly due to Donny being so horrible & Erica being so passive, but… is that not the point? Is Erica’s foolish behaviour not what *happens* to these victims? Personally I found the story harrowing & uncomfortable but intentionally so, & morbidly compelling. I also thought Donny was really well-conceptualised as a character: I recognised him. I know that man. & I think the dissociation Erica experiences as a result of her horrific manipulation was really effectively portrayed.
I also thought the writing was really nice & easy to read with some interesting images ~ my primary complaint would be the lack of setting. This is set in my own country but I didn’t recognise it till we’re ‘told’ so. There isn’t much ‘showing’ to make Aotearoa recognisable besides the place names, & it made it feel as if the story was happening inside a sort of void. The side characters also didn’t feel effectively described or distinct from each other, except perhaps Kyle who had some interesting dialogue, but the rest of them were just kind of… there. & the parents??? They’re obviously hella passive which perhaps explains Erica’s character, but this should have been explored much more. You could’ve also navigated their lack of interference by making them estranged or cruel towards Erica, although I think the passivity is an interesting angle: but because it wasn’t actually explored or explained, it’s really hard for the audience to suspend disbelief & accept their completely bizarre behaviour in the context of the story.
So much about Erica I recognised: her dependence on substances, her conditioning into the belief that every man wants to take advantage of her sexually, her destructive loneliness. She’s a tragic, pathetic, pitiful figure. & maybe I wish there was more development & hope for her by the end, but realistically that kind of abuse is so difficult to heal from & escape, so it did feel realistic. Thus, I suppose I found the book well-written & intriguing, but it just didn’t quite explore the themes to an extent that would’ve been most profoundly effective.