Paul Stoller's account of the West African Hauka spirit-possession movement interprets the body of the possessed medium as a locus for communal memories of European colonialism, and the cathartic resolution thereof; if mimesis is a means of comprehending the power of an Other, then so much more so a mimesis actualized in the very agentive body of the subject. The emergence and development of the movement are also given historical context, albeit with the inclusion of a concluding excursus in several chapters on the political machinery of early postcolonial Niger which makes a rather strained attempt to find traces of Hauka aesthetics in its style of governance.
While he rhetorically privileges its sensorial, embodied nature, Stoller perhaps more successfully elucidates mimesis in general as the more powerful frame in which to understand Hauka spirit possession. In a burlesque of French colonial officers and functionaries, arbitrary European authority seen through the eyes of the African subject, the social powers of the former regime are appropriated for the benefit of the Hauka cult's members. The Hauka movement served to dispel the mystique of colonial power in the same moment that it was recreated as a catalyzing potential among West African people themselves. Satire here is a controlled reinforcement of identity distinction, rehearsed on the subaltern's terms; the image of the European that Hauka possession refracts back into the social world is one of a wild, dangerously powerful alien force, now mastered.