The fourth book of the Knight Miscellaney series “focuses” on the story of the youngest sibling, Lady Jacinda Knight. I must admit, out of all the books I’ve read so far in this series (only read 5 out of the 7), this is the one I least like.
My main problem is the lead heroine. It’s kind of hard to like a character who acts like a spoiled rich brat/poor little rich girl for most of the story. At one level, you do feel for her because she is being forced to marry a family friend, because her brothers think this would make a “proper lady” out of her and that she won’t end up being like their mother, shunned by the ton for her very “unlady like” reputation and the number of affairs she had. Jacinda, meanwhile, wants to marry for love.
However, this scenario is one I didn’t really buy. For starters, all the other brothers (at least the ones whose stories were told in the previous books} didn’t give you the impression that they were brutes, the type that would really force her to marry someone she doesn’t want. Robert, Lucien and Damien all married their wives because of love; Alec wouldn’t care less, while Jack is nowhere to be seen. Their family was also very wealthy, so there was no economic rush to marry off their sister. The fact that Jacinda was able to reason her way out of the marriage through a very honest, moving speech, also showed that her brothers, overall, could be reasoned with. So this problem wasn’t really much of a problem.
At some level, you can feel sorry for her because as a woman in the times and society she lived in, she didn’t have much of a choice of how to live her life. Nevertheless, compared to others, like her friend, Liz, she still had a lot of resources and “more freedom” so some of her behaviour was just irritating. What frustrates me the most is that sometimes, you do see some really great redeeming qualities in her that I feel like was wasted. Compared to her male siblings, it was quite admirable that she remembered her mother for her more heroic acts and not just the scandals she created. This to me was one thing I didn’t like about the other brothers I’ve read so far – all of them acknowledged that their father was a cruel man, but no one seemed to connect the mother’s behaviour to have affairs as connected to this. Neither could they at least give her credit for the more admirable things she did, including sacrificing her life to save friends of hers from the French Revolution. Jacinda was the only one who acknowledged this side of her mother. So it was frustrating to see that instead of emulating her mother by pursuing more charitable pursuits (like perhaps being pro-poor like her sister-in-law Belle), she continues on acting like a spoiled brat and even planning to marry a very much older noble man so that when he dies, she would be free to do what she likes.
I don’t know, perhaps Ms Foley had no choice but to write her this way given her youth (she was only around 19) and to remain faithful to how women were during the Regency period. After all, this is one of the great strengths of her books, how well she infuses it with historical facts and how well she makes her characters more faithful to how men or women act during those times even though the books may end up being unappealing for readers in the present time. In some ways, I would have preferred if Jacinda’s story was made the last book in this series (she is after all, the youngest), just so she could be a bit older and possibly more mature.
The character I liked more in the book is the hero, Billy. In some ways, the book is really more of his story than Jacinda’s, and it’s just as well because his story is more interesting. I really love Billy. I love how much he is aware of the plight of the lower classes, and how much he continued caring about them even though he went back to his noble roots. His father was quite a brute and I personally feel he was forgiven too easily in the end. (Couldn’t care less if he was dying as he was a really awful person.) I had a problem with the hero’s name though. I know it’s superficial, but every time I read his name, he sounded more like a character who should be in the American west rather than rubbing shoulders with the other nobility in London.
Overall, this book was great, but compared to the others in the series, it didn’t grab me as much, hence, the 3 stars.