Can Mulan be interpreted as nationalistic, xenophobic and sexist against women? After reading this book, I must conclude: it can!!!
I decided to read this because it seemed to be a worthwhile endeavor, unlike wasting any more time on the next Disney cash-grab. If just the introduction wasn't 32 pages long!
Considered what the introduction had in terms of information, I really wonder why it wasn’t simply chapter 1. Because apparently the original poem probably was not about equality for women but revealing the inadequacies of men.
The "Historical Romance of the Sui and Tang" has a version of Mulan where she has a Turkish father, once again there is a khan instead of an emperor, and here we have the first appearance of a secondary female warrior named Dou Xianniang, and Mulan commits suicide to escape the harem of the Khan.
The version "The Story of the Loyal, Filial, and Heroic Mulan" adds supernatural elements like mystical and secret fighting techniques given by her grandfather and Mulan battles and triumphs over a fox spirit. Also, there she is made a princess and returns home to care for her orphaned brothers. And she also commits suicide. Because reasons.
So in “The Female Mulan” the bandit king's daughter falls in love with "Hua Hu".. where is the lesbian version of that story?
However, the novel "An Extraordinary History of the Northern Wei: The Story of a Filial and Heroic Girl" sounds way more interesting. And am I mistaken, or does it end with Mulan and her friend Wanhua marrying the same guy?
Was this 1903 opera called "Mulan joins the Army" the one that turned her into a Han Chinese? Plus, this description of "an ethnic Han nationalist heroic struggle against threatening foreign" forces and the whole role model for the new Chinese woman sounds like something you could interpret the Disney animated version as.
And while this information was interesting, I was happy when the introduction was over. 32 pages of introduction and they are not even included for the page count of this book; it should be 168 pages and not 136.
And it is still astounding how none of her companions ever noticed that she was a girl. No matter what version, that always happens. And of course, "Song of Mulan" just had to ruin its feminist leanings by revealing itself as basically saying "look, you men are so bad that a woman can do it better than you" no idea whether the play "The Female Mulan Joins the Army in Place of Her Father" has the same issues. All I know is that it had so many references and synonyms for foot binding that I had to look at the notes all the time. The rest of the play was easier to read, but it was still obvious how written down plays don't work when compared to the stage. And speaking of plays: so not only was there once a play/version of the Mulan story where she and another soldier dressed as women, but also this 1903 play has a character named Mu Shu. Maybe I have given Disney and other cartoonists of the 90s too little credit.
This 1903 play not only also seems to have a sort of man-shaming attitude in the form of Mu Shu (albeit it can be interpreted differently), it also addresses the fact that "he-Mulan" looks like a girl, definitely has a nationalist, almost racist, element with its foreign invaders that should be exterminated and its focus on Han people.
I thought that this "Mulan joins the army" from 1937 mentioned here was the same movie I found on you tube called “Hua Mulan,” but doesn't look like it. In fact, looks like I was mistaken: This Mulan Joins the Army is a play and not a movie. So, is this the version where she fights a fox?
Or was it a film after all? This part of the book was confusing AND boring. Unlike the earlier ones.
Well, I hoped the appendices are better. And I would soon be done with this anyway.
The appendices were indeed better, it got early to the play with all the gay content, as not only is there the bandit daughter who has the hots for cross-dressed Mulan, but a superior is bisexual and also wants to tap that ass.
The "Hua Mulan" version from 1897 - 1914 seems standard as Mulan versions go, however. But at least somewhat distinct, afterwards there were three scripts of the same play and then these last two plays from 1932 and 42 I bet were clearly directed against the Japanese."
Towards the end there was also a short version of the story were Mulan has supernatural powers and was fighting a fox spirit. But it was not in a play but in a Qing dynasty era novel. I confused that apparently.
And sadly, this is another book that ends abruptly. Some closing chapter or passage would really be nice for a change.
So, in the end, this book has its flaws but it is clearly recommendable.