What do you think?
Rate this book


In the fall of 1984, after Raymond Carver's Cathedral came out, I got a letter from a former professor of mine, the best writing teacher I ever had. It was in his class three years earlier that I'd first been exposed to Carver's stories. It was under his tutelage that I came fully to appreciate Carver's idiosyncratic, totemic genius.
The letter was generous about what he'd seen of my new writing. What I remember best about the letter, though, was its postscript. He'd read Cathedral and was disappointed. Nearly all the protagonists are inarticulate, blue-collar drunks, struggling not to be either. Most fail. Busted marriages everywhere. The same components, again and again and again. Carver seems, my professor wrote, to have lapsed into self-parody.
Those sentiments all of which except the self-parody part are indisputable were shared by many reviewers. Yet 15 years later, opinion has come full circle: The stories in Cathedral are those upon which Carver's reputation most squarely rests. The similarities between the stories' component elements are a unifying device, but a deceptive one. Upon further review (as NFL referees were once wont to say), the stories in that book have a greater depth and broader range of emotion than those in Carver's earlier books. The subject matter is more diverse. The shapes the stories take are more varied. Even the spectrum of socioeconomic classes depicted is wider. Carver's core obsessions, far from seeming self-parodic, are part of what makes Carver so strangely andwonderfullyhimself.
So it is in the sublime oeuvre of Vladimir Nabokov, who, with five-minutes-to-Wapner tirelessness, returns in book after book to chess, tennis, doppelgängers, émigrés, and butterflies. Though this may sound like shtick, it plays more as the signature moves of a great athlete; watching the components accrue is like watching Michael Jordan play, waiting to see that unblockable fadeaway, that semiunconscious tongue loll, that assassin's look he gets in his eye with the game on the line. (I'm sure, if I knew anything about chess or tennis, the allusion here might appropriately be to Bobby Fischer or Martina Navratilova, but I am, alas, a prisoner to my own core obsessions).
And so it is with Thom Jones in all three of his books his debut, the National Book Award-nominated The Pugilist At Rest, the much-admired title story of which became an instant classic; Cold Snap, which may have lacked a killer story on the order of "The Pugilist at Rest" but was a more consistently dazzling book; and the brand-spanking-new left jab and right cross of Sonny Liston was a Friend of Mine.
Jones's eclectic checklist of obsessions:
Janitors. Epilepsy. The chronically unemployed ("No-Jobs," they call themselves). Tormented lower fauna (the new book includes a talismanic tarantula, a doomed roadrunner, and, most memorably, in the brilliant "Mouses," several dozen mice at the mercy of a No-Job whose pathology manifests itself in his stay-at-home stint as a self-taught lab scientist: a clinically detached bout of sadism and earnest self-delusion that only seems chilling when you step away from the story and all the more chilling thereby). Vietnam. Clinical madness (including "A Midnight Clear," a convincing story set on Christmas day at a poorly funded asylum, told from the point of view of a doctor visiting for personal reasons). Brand-name, prescription meds (ingested and discussed by characters who know their effects and side effects with the same ebullient precision jailhouse lawyers bring to the state penal code; in the acknowledgments in Cold Snap, Jones thanks the manufacturers of Elavil and Effexor). German philosophy (Schopenhauer, Nietzsche).
It's fun and scary to watch these things emerge, story by story, and courageous too, because it's a tactic that by definition walks the line between mannerism and true style in a way that makes the disparate stories seem...
312 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1998