When I stumbled across this book at the Library, I was looking for books about Bletchley Park. I found the book I was looking for, but this one just a shelf down and found its way to the top of my stack before the codebreaker book did.
The story follows the men on the ground during the sabotage mission of the Nazi-controlled Vemork heavy water plant in Norway. The long months leading up to the main mission, when the forward team was monitoring conditions and staying hidden in the snowy wilderness of the Norwegian Telemark region, gave a different feel than any other spy/war story I've come across.
Reading it in the middle of a Wisconsin winter, I couldn't help but compare my winter to theirs. The sparsity of flora and fauna certainly made survival much more of a challenge than trudging across the street through the snow to the grocery store. The lack of roads meant skiing for miles just to hunt for food.
There were also a lot of deaths surrounding the mission (though certainly a miniscule number in the scope of the whole war). Reading about the deaths involved and how they led to a resolve in the others—the whole team was supplied with suicide pills—made me hope for better ways of doing things. For example, Norwegians working at the plant reduced output by adding vegetable oil to the water to create lots of foam. Of coarse, the Allies in charge were in a race with the Nazis to build the first atomic weapon, something speculative at that point but still with awesome potential. Who can say if the more peaceful forms of resistance would have kept the Nazis from achieving such a game-changing weapon.
The narrative form of the book was both its strength and weakness. Gallagher was a journalist who tells the story based on various interviews he had with many of the key players. The story he tells reads much like a thriller instead of a history book. But the lack of citation bothers me, as did the liberties he took with description. I know there's often a stereotype of dry history books, but I've read plenty of fascinating history books with more academic rigor than this one. Those books were more modern, though, and given that this one was originally published in the 70s, perhaps it was much better for its time.
In all, this was a good read. I'd recommend it as a good quick read, and perhaps an introduction for someone who's intimidated by some of the massive, dry-looking tomes out there.