This book is mainly interviews with Mexicans ranging from day laborers to border runners to factory owners, written immediately before the passage of NAFTA. The treaty is feared to mute the voice of the individual in favor of corporate giants, and, well, shit I guess that came true.
I read this before I went to rural Mexico for a week to try to understand the life I would encounter. The book describes Mexico as a system that favors powerful patronage, one that event subsumes socialist labor movements. Survival depends upon knowing the right person and paying him off, the classic third-world stereotype.
Is it true? I assume so; the interviews are honest and don't seem to select for spectacular success stories or the people most firmly lodged under the boot of industry. I saw no direct evidence of patronage, but nobody in my borrowed corner of San Luis Potosi seemed to be particularly high nor low, a permanent lower-middle class. Business was conducted through relationships though, a tacit endorsement of the patronage system. We bought fruit trees from one vendor because our host "knew he was a good man who cared" and a second nursery-owner insisted upon re-packing our truck because "it would be wrong to take your money and send you home without helping you."
A cynical reading chalks that up to naïvety - You bought the trees, that's your problem, and now each of you is beholden to the other and you can REALLY get screwed! Such an interpretation damns that patronage system as a corrupt old-boys club that could exclude you, a human without a connection to that caring nursery owner. I find nepotism troubling and ossifying, but having seen a flavor of it, I was touched by the consideration placed upon relationships between people. In a nation without a cornucopia of money and stuff, relationships are essential because you can't hide in your fortress of dollars and silently throw a pile of Hamiltons at a problem.
I don't know how that affects my interpretation of the book, but the relationship between people, their bonds, and power is inescapable.