I had to think about what this book could help children learn.
The father’s behaviour is problematic. It’s one thing to be burdened by one’s thoughts and circumstances; quite another to completely ignore the son’s injury just because he’s physically incapable of meeting your labour requirements and the corresponding expectations of him.
The fact that the son has to prove his worth to “earn” the father’s affection is even worse IMO. It’s quite.. materialistic? The situation, albeit different, reminded me of the scene in Rocketman when the adult Elton meets his father and sees the affection readily available to the other son. Not a good feeling for the kid.
Given the lack of any depth to the family’s portrayal or their hardships, it’s hard to take the father as anything but selfish.
So, my quandary in rating this book comes down to:
- Is the father supposed to be “bad”? Is that the intended portrayal? If yes, it is definitely worth explaining to the child why that is the case. It’s a valuable lesson.
- If, however, the father is supposed to be “normal” or “good”, we’re talking about complete ignorance of parental abuse (of the emotional kind) bestowed upon the kid and portrayed as something the kid has to work through.
The bee facts are completely irrelevant to the book or its story anyway, as are the bees themselves. It’s just their produce that’s valuable to the family. Again, materialistic. Is that intended? I don’t know. There’s absolutely nothing else in the book about bees that’s relevant to the story.
So, this comes down to me; as a parent; using this book to convey these possible problematic interpretations at the correct time (based on the child’s understanding and life experiences). So, that does render some value to this book, along with decent watercolour paintings.