First place, Large Nonprofit Publishers Illustrated Covers, 2010 Washington Book PublishersNamed one of the Top Five Books of 2009 by Anne Grant, The Providence Journal This history of father-daughter incest in the United States explains how cultural mores and political needs distorted attitudes toward and medical knowledge of patriarchal sexual abuse at a time when the nation was committed to the familial power of white fathers and the idealized white family. For much of the nineteenth century, father-daughter incest was understood to take place among all classes, and legal and extralegal attempts to deal with it tended to be swift and severe. But public understanding changed markedly during the Progressive Era, when accusations of incest began to be directed exclusively toward immigrants, blacks, and the lower socioeconomic classes. Focusing on early twentieth-century reform movements and that era’s epidemic of child gonorrhea, Lynn Sacco argues that middle- and upper-class white males, too, molested female children in their households, even as official records of their acts declined dramatically. Sacco draws on a wealth of sources, including professional journals, medical and court records, and private and public accounts, to explain how racial politics and professional self-interest among doctors, social workers, and professionals in allied fields drove claims and evidence of incest among middle- and upper-class white families into the shadows. The new feminism of the 1970s, she finds, brought allegations of father-daughter incest back into the light, creating new societal tensions. Against several different historical backdrops―public accusations of incest against “genteel” men in the nineteenth century, the epidemic of gonorrhea among young girls in the early twentieth century, and adult women’s incest narratives in the mid-to late twentieth century―Sacco demonstrates that attitude shifts about patriarchal sexual abuse were influenced by a variety of individuals and groups seeking to protect their own interests.
I am so grateful to the author for this exhaustive, brilliant survey of father-daughter incest in America. When I went to the Internet to find out more about father-daughter incest rates for a book I'm writing, I was shocked at the lack of hard evidence. I thought I'd find bar graphs, statistics, hard facts from reputable sources. There was precious little of that. But the hits I got kept mentioning Lynn Sacco and this book. It covered exactly the time frame and subject I was looking for, so I gulped and paid the fairly stiff price. I'm glad I did. What a brilliant way to ferret out the truth--suspecting that father-daughter incest is and has always been underreported, she looked instead at the rates of gonorrhea in little girls as young as four or five years old. Surprise, surprise: the stats were there, because Americans--especially white, privileged Americans--convinced themselves that little girls couldn't possibly be picking up this STD from their fathers, so they blamed everything else--toilet seats, dirty sheets, even doorknobs--while the girls (and their concerned mothers) continued to be victimized, blamed, and marginalized. Thank you, Ms. Sacco, for this important work.
Exhaustively researched and a necessary read for anyone interested not only in feminism but in the pervasive role that social bias plays in constructing "objective" scientific consensus
Lynn was a professor on my dissertation committee and now a good friend. This book and she, as a historian, deserve all the accolades coming their way.