For years, I'd heard about Yarbro's vampire series and how it foreshadowed the sexy vampire but without the angst or sexism. Recently I've started reading the books and while the sexy, non-angsty, and egalitarian part is true, I've been disappointed in terms of the story being able to hold my attention and in terms of the historical content.
"Roman Dusk" is set up as St. Germain's return to the city of Rome, about 110-120 years after he was last there in "Blood Games." Given the importance of paperwork and record keeping to at least one of the plots of this novel, I am shocked that the vampire would even come back to Rome so soon. His previous lover turned pseudo vampire even still holds a house in Rome under her original name. Seriously? Just because we don't have a lot of surviving records from Rome doesn't mean they weren't good record keepers and if that idea of bureaucracy is important to your story, set it more realistic further down the line, perhaps in the period of the Tetrarchy.
The entire side political scenes on Heliogabalus that ran through much of the book suggests that his non-traditional rule and personality was the real reason for placing the book in this time period. It allowed for St. Germain to witness and feel disgust at Roman practices and how easily they fell into following the Emperor's example. Yet, the vampire expresses few emotions. I want him to feel things more intensely, darn it!
Setting the story good century later would also help the Christian plot line make more sense. As it was, it floated in and out then suddenly was a major cause of destruction that twists St. Germain's normally calm nature monstrous. The tone of the Christians in this book felt like more strawmen than full characters because I didn't understand what they were doing or why beyond zealotry.
Of course being that this is St. Germain we must have a love interest, or in this case, two. One relationship felt real and honest while the other again seemed to suddenly escalate over the course of only three scenes and then not really be more than a trigger for an act of revenge. The scenes that switched to these women's viewpoints and experiences made them more relatable but I felt it detracted from St. Germain who needed to be more multifaceted to live up to his reputation.
Finally the friendships between St. Germain and a handful of Romans initially seemed quite important yet it was treated in such detached scenes that I never got a good grip on how he originally knew these men and why they and he cared at all. Business? Not really. Why turn to a foreign exile (a point so repeatedly stated that it could be a drinking game for a book club) if you need help with bureaucratic matters? You wouldn't, no Roman would especially if there is so much corruption as this book shows.
Setting the book later would have helped with several problems but the erratic switching between scenes is still an issue. So why am I giving this 3 stars? There are scenes that are well-crafted, there are continuing characters that stand up from book to book, and St. Germain is a rare type of vampire that just could be made more interesting.