Okay, Blacksad.
So, I recommend this book for people who love beautifully drawn graphic novels. I also recommend it for people who love andromorphism. And I recommend it to people who'd like a visual example of what's problematic about the way women and men are portrayed.
Now I'll start with what I liked about this book, just to get it out of the way. The art. The aht. It's wonderful. I think it may be my all-time favorite. The stories aren't bad either. Read this a while back, can't say anything more substantial about those.
So, now for the reason I'm writing this review in the first place. In the introduction Steranko writes the following. "In Blacksad's world, the characters are generally unconcerned about their zoological differences; they are cast for their natures and personalities. To the perceptive reader, it's almost impossible not to see a trace of slinky Lauren Bacall in Natalia Wilford or burly Ernie Borgnine in Jake Ostiombe or slippery James Woods in the lizard. It's no accident that, down to the last bit player, they've all been visually crafted to reflect their intrinsic qualities - which might just qualify as overt symbolism."
Okay Steranko.
This is the breakdown of (sub)species displayed by women and men, including back-ground figures, exluding undetailed ones
Women: Cat (14), Bear (5), Dog (17), Giraffe (1), Goat (3), Mouse (2), Ostrich (1), Pig (1), Zebra (1).
Men: Arctic fox (1), Alligator (2), Anteater (2), Antilope (1), Bear (7), Beaver, (3), Buffalo (1), Carrion (1), Cat (3), Chicken (1), Crocodile (1), Dog (38), Donkey (2), Duck (4), Eagle (1), Ferret (1), Fox (2), Goat (1), Gorilla (3), Great tit (1), Hare (1), Hippo (1), Horse (1), Hyena (1), Koala (1), Lion (1), Lizard (6), Lynx (1), Mouse (3), Orang-Utan (5), Owl (3), Parrot (1), Pig (2), Polar bear (1), Rabbit (1), Raccoon (1), Ram (4), Rat (5), Rhino (1), Ring-tailed lemur (1), Sheep (1), Seal (3), Snake (1), Swine (2), Toad (1), Tiger (white) (1), Turtle (3), Weasel (2), Wolf (2), Zebra (1)
There's several ways to interpret this. This is a noir, taking place in the 1950's, and according to that tradition, there's approximately 3 women in the world - your ma, your girlfriend, and your enemy's girlfriend. The frequency is not the point. The diversity is the point. As Steranko points out in an entirely different context in the introduction; the zoology is chosen to typecast. If we assume that every species illustrates something - a race, a power position, a personality trait - then what does this say about females? And this has been discussed before, but in this book it's just so painfully obvious; females are seen as females first, but males are seen as diverse as they are.
Even the women thatare in the book are barely animal - it's hard to tell female cats from dogs and even cats from goats when they all have human-style long head hair and no visible fur elsewhere, unlike the males of their species. All of the "main" female characters are cats, and there's one bear that doesn't look like a bear besides the cute round ears. The point is that they are female before the species they are portrayed as, and if the male species are chosen to illustrate some sort of trait, then it seems like being female is a trait, reducing an equally diverse part of the population to their gender. Please just let me be some sort of Corvidae.
In short; absolutely amazing art, okay story, but I will not be pulling this out of the closet for anyone to see for that reason. It's because it makes a wonderful example of how women are portrayed as belonging to their gender before any other, much more interesting traits.