An interesting approach to the potential to change the world through examining the possibility another presents as if it were one’s own actions which brought this possibility about. Shelby Steele was convinced – if one takes the subtitle of this book seriously – that Barack Obama would not be voted in as president of the United States. Yet he did get voted in, and now people are starting to feel disappointed by what he has been able to achieve in that position, I read this book in a way that would not have been possible for me at the time it was written.
Both men have mixed race parents. I am a Caucasian living on the other side of the world. My understanding and experience of racism comes from another place entirely from their experience. I read with deep interest, but a significant distance.
Yet many of the things presented through Steele’s analysis of Obama, and the society in which they both live, touches my own life and my own experience in a particular way. For me the experience of my mother and my father seeming to always present a united front to the seven children they had, is the same experience of unpacking what the expectations of the world seem to be against the experience of living with two very different individuals as if they believed and should represent the world to us as their own.
While Steele speaks on page 4 of the impossibility “to think of myself, … as half and half” because it is “a kind of bullying truth that pushes aside actual human experience” I experienced the sense that I am now aware of the mix from which I come. There is not one image from which I arise, but many. Just as the divisions are not how we necessarily live our lives, neither is the whitewash accurate either.
This was an altogether unexpected reaction.
Perhaps it is because of this reverse interpretation which occurs when looking in a mirror which made the Obama experience so present in the lives of so many people. Perhaps it was how the ability to question on one side of the equation could allow questions on the other which freed people up from their own bonds.
But Steele goes on to show how Obama used his inheritance to consciously activate particular expectations within himself through which he could act in alignment with particular causes to propel him onward. His argument is that these very allegiances are what will also bind him in ways that he need not necessarily be bound. He considers it a self-imposed limitation.
These few years down the track show that the limitations are not necessarily the more obvious ones of colour or race. The limitations are the ways in which any movement away from one position seems to insinuate a particular polar opposition. The limitation is within our thinking that this is so.
As with a Hall of Mirrors, there are many oppositions to one view. When we consider vertical or horizontal or back to front interpretations, there are many ways to read ourselves as different from each other. Steele uses this book to, in a sense, turn himself inside out. It is a process from which we could all learn a great deal about our own possibilities to continue the journey together.
A slim volume at 143 pages, but every one of them suggests ways in which we are bound for freedom. Do not be duped into thinking it anachronistic. There is much to be learnt here.