Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory

by Chris Weedon

Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory offers a clear and accessible introduction to poststructuralist theory, focusing on questions of language, subjectivity and power. It examines how we might use poststructuralism to theorize gender, identity and experience in patriarchal societies. Drawing on the work of Saussure, Derrida, Freud, Lacan, Kristeva, Irigaray, Cixous, and Foucault, it argues for a form of feminist poststructuralism that can help bring about social change.

Genres: Feminism, Gender, Nonfiction, Philosophy, Theory

208 pages, Paperback

Published December 23, 1996

Reviews

[KD · Rating 5 out of 5]

This book offered a very readable introduction to poststructuralist theory and its feminist applications, as well as useful comparisons and contrasts to other feminist theories. I found the focus on language especially useful.

[Ali · Rating 5 out of 5]

The theory is not not useful at all, but Weedon explains it and its influences in a way that is easy to understand and also tries to give practical examples, something other poststructuralist texts, even introductory ones, completely lack. The practise part is not any sort of activism but literary practise - which again is not useful in terms of struggle for liberation, but also very typical for poststructuralism and therefore a very honest approach.

[Nyoman.Indra · Rating 3 out of 5]

The key concepts are subject position, discourse and the relationship between language, social institutions and individual consciousness. From there we can make clear what Weedon means by “subjectivity.”

[Cloud · Rating 5 out of 5]

Easily understandable and packed full with so very useful information. I've quoted from it already and I've just started my dissertation. Great work Ms Weedon!

[Ketab Dozd · Rating 3 out of 5]

بعنوان یه کتاب مربوط به تقریبا ۴۰ سال پیش جالبه

[Stef Rozitis · Rating 5 out of 5]

I found this book very useful because it is written in a clear, simple no-nonsense way for all that it cites people like Foucault and Derrida. I thought it would be dated but actually it explained a lot of the "backstory" for me on more recent texts I have read and I wish someone had got me to read this a lot earlier (but of course since noone lives inside my head they don;t know where my gaps are just as I don't know what I ought to read cause I haven't read it yet).

It outlines different sorts of feminisms (liberal, marxist and rad-fem being the main ones) and goes through the philosophical frameworks around them showing their relationship to things like psycho-analysis (eg Freud) where even when they are critical of the patriarchy they are taking on some of the assumptions and more or less buying into essentialism.

I found it helpful that the book wasn't saying that Marxism (for example) was wrong but just relating the gender essentialism within those frameworks to continued inequality of voice and status. Then it brings in postructuralism not instead of other forms of feminism but as a way of making them work harder and get further. It also explained postructuralism really well and so clearly that I only had to slow down my reading slightly to understand. I will return to this text again and again I think.

I think the book has challenged my own "easy answer" feminism somewhat while it hasn't told me I am "wrong" as such (because I am not). I will read more of Weedon and I hope she is still around and writing :)

[Robin · Rating 3 out of 5]

Truly I only half-read this. Based on the discussion in my feminist book club, it seemed to have lots of interesting ideas.

[Jona · Rating 1 out of 5]

i read the chapter on psychoanalysis...pp 42-70.

[Monica · Rating 5 out of 5]

An excellent and accessible introduction and overview of the usefulness of poststructuralism in feminism. A must read for those interested in these fields!