"If it needs a man who has suffered to write a commentary on Job . . . . Perhaps the only person entitled to comment on Ecclesiastes is a cynic who has revolted from the world in disillusionment and disgust." "If so," writes Michael Eaton, "I qualify."Scholars have long wrestled with the gloomy pessimism and striking omission of any mention of Yahweh in this portion of the Wisdom literature. After setting forth the issues related to the text, authorship, date and canonicity, Eaton assesses the purpose and structure of the book. He then provides a passage-by-passage analysis that attempts to account for the oddities of the text and to show its contemporary relevance.
Very good commentary on Ecclesiastes. I often found myself in wholehearted agreement with Eaton’s interpretations and appreciated the way he worded them. Didn’t completely agree with his approach to authorship, but at least he believes the whole book is normative (unlike Longman, for example). I was very much helped by this commentary.
This is definitely a straight commentary, so reading it cover to cover was a little dry, probably because it's more intended for searching and finding as you want to understand a specific part of Ecclesiastes. That said, I enjoyed it and found a lot of overlap with other commentaries and discussions I've read this year. Ecclesiastes is indeed "strikingly relevant to this century," as Eaton writes (178).
Some highlights I marked down:
“..the main lesson of Ecclesiastes: the need to face life as it really is, and take our life day by day from the hand of a sovereign God” (157).
“‘Look!’ he says in effect. ‘This is what it is really like. Can you face life in this world as it really is? There is only one way to do so'" (105).
The Preacher “demands simply that the believer face life in this world as it really is” (130).
“The secret of it all is: it is God-given" (141).
“If viewed without reference to God (‘under the sun’), the world in which we find ourselves is a chaos without meaning or progress (1:2-11); neither wisdom (1:12-18) nor pleasure (2:1-11) will enable us to live contentedly” (65).
“Confine your viewpoint to this world and its resources, says the Preacher, and all the contentions of pessimism are true” (42).
A clear and concise book on Ecclesiastes, with plenty of helpful notes. I'm not persuaded of Eaton's overall interpretation, according to which Qohelet takes up a "secular" mindset, for the sake of argument, to show that the life of faith is the only way to live. I think the Preacher is not nearly that sure of himself.
Macro-level disagreements aside, Eaton writes well, offers cogent arguments, and shows his work without getting overly technical.
Another Ecclesiastes resource. I liked the verse by verse notes in this volume. A little bit more academic than the devotional type of reading but a lot of good information.
“What then, is the purpose of Ecclesiastes? It is an essay in apologetics. It defends the life of faith in a generous God by pointing to the grimness of the alternative.”, p. 44
I highly recommend Eaton's commentary. It is as about as good as a concise commentary on Ecclesiastes can be. His style is fact-filled and concise. He actually provides a useful treatment of Ecclesaistes--which is the exception these days, not the rule. Pound-for-pound, it is the most helpful commentary on Ecclesiastes I have examined, and I have examined dozens. In particular, Eaton understands the fundamental dynamic of the book, which many commentators, sadly, miss. Namely: that life on earth, life "under the sun," does(!) seem grievous, unjust, and without any ultimate benefit. But Eaton points out that the writer of Ecclesaistes ("Qoheleth"), implicitly argues that there is more to life than can be found by merely observing life "under the sun." That is what sets up the apparent tension within the book: that Qoheleth often, in fact usually, describes life only in-so-far as it can be observed on earth; but then he shifts gears, and speaks of what he knows ("but I know") and then refers to God. It is when one reveres ("fears") God, and lives in relation to Him, Qoheleth points out, that life can be satisfying--as God intended it to be. Eaton rightly understands this, and it pervades his insightful exposition of Ecclesiastes.
A Bible commentary is like an advisor to help you read the Scriptures. Eaton does a great job with this on Ecclesiastes. He suggests that the entire book of Ecclesiastes is about secularism vs. orthodoxy, and about a horizontal outlook (looking at all creation) and a vertical outlook (looking up to God). The secularist only sees horizontally, while the Christian also sees up. The point of the Preacher in Ecclesiastes is that secularism is entirely empty, pointless, futile: nihilism actually makes sense in a secular outlook.
A solid attempt at making sense from a book that can be a tough one to work out. The author divides the 'under the sun' sections about our dimension from the sections about the eternal world of God and this generally works well. I'm not really a Wisdom literature guy as my first choice of Scriptures, but it is important for a Christian to understand the whole of the inspired Word and this book certainly helps grant some understanding.