The historian Polybius (ca. 200-118 BCE) was born into a leading family of Megalopolis in the Peloponnese (Morea) and served the Achaean League in arms and diplomacy for many years, favoring alliance with Rome. From 168 to 151 he was held hostage in Rome, where he became a friend of Lucius Aemilius Paulus and his two sons, especially Scipio Aemilianus, whose campaigns, including the destruction of Carthage, he later attended. Late in his life he became a trusted mediator between Greece and the Romans; helped in the discussions that preceded the final war with Carthage; and after 146 was entrusted by the Romans with the details of administration in Greece.
Polybius' overall theme is how and why the Romans spread their power as they did. The main part of his history covers the years 264-146 BCE, describing the rise of Rome, her destruction of Carthage, and her eventual domination of the Greek world. It is a great work: accurate, thoughtful, largely impartial, based on research, and full of insight into customs, institutions, geography, the causes of events, and the character of peoples. It is a vital achievement of the first importance despite the incomplete state in which all but the first five of its original forty books have reached us.
For this edition, W. R. Paton's excellent translation, first published in 1922, has been thoroughly revised, the Buttner-Wobst Greek text corrected, and explanatory notes and a new introduction added, all reflecting the latest scholarship.
Polybius (ca. 200–118 BC), Greek Πολύβιος) was a Greek historian of the Hellenistic Period noted for his book called The Histories covering in detail the period of 220–146 BC. He is also renowned for his ideas of political balance in government, which were later used in Montesquieu's The Spirit of the Laws and in the drafting of the United States Constitution.
If you’d like to read about Hannibal crossing the Alps with his elephants then this is the book for you. It’s not quite an eye-witness account, but was written so soon afterwards that Polybius could certainly have spoken to eye-witnesses, and it reads as if he did. You could jump straight in, but reading the first volume really does set the scene. This second volume tells the tale of the first half of the Second Punic War. I presume the story concludes in volume three. I’ve read a fair bit of ancient military history now and can tell you that Polybius’s clear, precise descriptions of troop movements and battles really can’t be bettered. I’m also starting to pick up on the difference between good and bad soldiering, and having read so many descriptions of the most appalling battlefield incompetence it’s a real pleasure to see Hannibal not just soldiering well but doing it with such style. Five stars for this part of the book.
The second half turns to Greece in the same period. It’s that little stretch of time between Alexander the Great and the Romans. It’s like a calmer version of what was going on in Palestine at the same time as various personages jostle for power, whistling while Rome grows. Polybius is somewhat hampered by his material here. It’s not intrinsically the most interesting period and his account must necessarily be as confusing as the alliances themselves. It’s not until Philip begins his campaign that there’s an overriding story. Being Greek himself, Polybius is unable to maintain the cold objectivism of his account of the Romans and there’s a fair bit of emotive language. Certainly entertaining but perhaps not the best history writing.
This volume of covers mostly the wars with Hannibal. I read a book on Hannibal (Hannibal: One Man Against Rome by Harold Lamb) that went over most of the information. But for ancient history I find it very useful to dig down to the actual sources, since they are usually relatively slim. It really helps you to see what part of other historian's account are historical fact, and which are their speculations.