I really, really liked this book. The premise is simple: over the course of two years, the author conducted self-help "experiments" - taking the advice of popular experts in areas of marriage/health/finances/etc. Niesslein's writing is sharp and funny, and her approach to the various self-help books is generally just the right balance of openness and suspicion.
I had prematurely given the book five stars because I was digging it so very much, but then the last chapter - on spirituality - was disappointing. She makes some fine observations about organized religion and her aversion to it, but then approaches it with a superficiality that grated on me. And I'm not talking about her use of the Belief-o-matic, that funky little Beliefnet tool that deemed Niesslein to be in the same Belief-o-matic sector as me (a combination of Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestant, Liberal Quaker, and Unitarian Universalist). Nah, that's good clean fun.
I cringed at some of her comments about Presbyterianism (essentially that it's milquetoasty, although Niesslein likes the feisty Anne Lamott, who is fully Presby and not the least bit milquey). I also took issue with the characterization of Christianity as a faith that is about belief, as opposed to practice. There are certainly plenty of Christians who privilege orthodoxy over orthopraxis, but there's quite a bit of traction in the "Christian practices" movement, from evangelical emergents to, you guessed it, Presbyterians.
I think what really got to me was the lumping in of religion with self-help. Sure, there are self-help books written from a religious perspective, but there's just so much more to religion and spirituality. I recognize this is a totally biased opinion - I am, after all, an ordained mainline Protestant pastor, undeniably part of organized religion. When Niesslein abandons religious spirituality for the secular spirituality of Oprah after reading Lamott and Harold Kushner, I felt like she'd given short shrift to religion and spirituality (and this is in contrast to the other chapters, in which she puts a great deal of effort into her "experiments"). She doesn't so much as visit a church (or temple or mosque or...), as she's disinterested in the community aspect of religious faith and practice. What she does do to finish up the "soul" chapter is laudable - volunteering editorial services for a community organizing group. But this participating in this project is treated as an alternative to religion and spirituality, establishing again the subtle message that religion isn't about actually doing anything to make a difference.
I've spent this entire review explaining the absence of one star in an otherwise stellar book. Oops. Really and truly, Jennifer Niesslein easily places alongside Sarah Vowell, David Foster Wallace, and the aforementioned Anne Lamott in my pantheon of superb nonfiction writers. I'm just a little cranky about that star, which I'm sure says a whole lot about the state of my own soul. I'd pick up some self-help, but I've had enough vicariously for now.