What do you think?
Rate this book


286 pages, Hardcover
First published June 1, 1925
"The North-American Indian, up to quite recent times, lived the free and simple life of the savage...as our own ancestors lived many years ago" (p. 150); "they [the Mexicans & Peruvians] had no love of beauty such as purified and ennobled the Greeks, and they had a much lower intellectual development" (p. 189); "The Chinese are naturally an unimaginative people, and in the secluded life that they have led for centuries, carefully shutting themselves off from intercourse with other peoples, there has been little to stir them up and force their imaginations to become active. Their myths, therefore, have not developed, but have remained mere childish tales" (p. 280); [following a favourable comparison to the 'Christian ideal of a universal Father',] "it would be strange if it were not so, for the Australian native has descended from one of the highest races. Unfortunately for him, he became isolated in the great forests and spaces of Australia...otherwise we may be certain that this most ancient of all the peoples would have developed to a higher stage" (p. 294).
I recall no such disparagement concerning the Greeks, Romans, Norsemen, Egyptians and Hindu. I spend so much space here detailing my annoyance with Cruse on this topic because it lowers the longevity of what is a great introductory collection of myths, IMO. The "complexity equals worth" mode of assessment is firmly dated, and those opening salvos had little to do with how most readers enjoy the subsequent stories anyway. It's not her dismissal that is upsetting, it's her flimsy basis for doing so and her false assertion of a 'standard'.
With all that dealt with, the stories were mostly fun to read! The Greeks & Romans were exciting, b/c they still pop up ever so often in our contemporary (Western) life. The Norsemen were fun to read also, especially since Marvel's recent Thor films (Loki is apparently the cause of our earthquakes...it figures). The remaining collections were much shorter than these two (the Babylonians only get a single myth in there), and the standout of these by far was the Hindus. It was a rollicking read, which made the pages fly by. Leaping from this book, I'll look for more about Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek mythology b/c those ones interested me most.