A BOOK OF TWO HALVES
2.5 Stars!
Set the time machine to 2007 and I’m at a train station somewhere in Perth, Australia and this older man comes up to me (always a surprise as I have an aggressive resting face) and began talking intensely at me about a whole load of random, historical subjects. Two things became apparent, he had a lot of knowledge, and he was er very eccentric. This went on for about fifteen minutes (even on the train) until I got off and ran away.
Anyway that was a convoluted way of saying that this book, for the first couple of hundred pages at least, was like the literary equivalent of that experience. If my memory serves me correctly, this author came across as fairly lively and engaging during a recent interview and there’s no doubt that Frankopan has the data, but he can’t edit and as a consequence both this book and the reader suffer as a result.
“Today in the US the disparity between deaths of infants born to white and black mothers is actually greater than it was in the first half of the nineteenth century.”
The numbers, years and dates mentioned in here start to melt your head after a while. This is clearly an ambitious and brave undertaking, but I found his style far too dry, dense and verbose to hold my interest for long enough spells, until we got around 300 pages in and then this suddenly grew into a good book.
He makes some good points about the temptation and issues that can arise through over-simplifying data or conflating results from one region to another etc. It was also interesting to learn about the many ways in which scientists gather more detailed, historical data from ice, bones, faeces, pollen and tree rings and other sources which allows them to learn about major events like the intense and repeated volcanic events around the planet which had such vast and lasting impact on so much of the world.
“From the middle of the seventh century onwards, regular raiding, coupled with the rising costs of the military defences, led not only to long-term economic decline but to lowered living standards and falling life expectancy which created a vicious circle downwards that took centuries to correct.”
Sound familiar?...This was in reference to the Byzantine Empire. And what about,
“Around 800 wealthy elites had started successfully to build up landholdings, using status, connections and political pressure to influence taxation systems and water allocations. This brought about short-term gains at the expense of long-term sustainability-both economic and environmental.”
This was in Mesopotamia around the 800s, again it’s hard to ignore the similarities.
Frankopan also shows the huge importance of El Nino and let’s not forget the potatoes. When viewed over such a vast period of history the cycles of famine, disease, war, poverty and greed are almost comforting in their predictability. In many ways very little changes, the rich and powerful will always resort to almost anything to remain that way, and have very little regard for the majority who made them rich. He is also good on the myth of the Little Ice Age, showing that it is far more complex and nuanced than many authors and historians would have you believe.
So this was really a book of two, very different halves, the first part was a real battle, where the good was too often and too quickly crowded out by the sheer verbiage. But if you can endure the first couple of hundred pages and push through to the better stuff then you will find some reward, though I can’t promise it was worth it, you will certainly learn a lot.
Ultimately, there’s no shortage of middle age white men churning out these kinds of books, I’ve certainly read my fair share, and I would say that this is an example to show aspiring authors and academics on how not to write them. This would have been so much better if only the editor had been as brave and self-indulgent as the author.