I read this book twice, partially because I had to return it before I was able to process my thoughts on it and partially because I loved it so much the first time. The main revelation of this book (an in-depth comparison of our bodies to a garden) is powerful and I’m excited to think about it more and in other contexts.
Anita Phillips was blown away when she saw the visual similarities between neurons and plants during her PhD program. Later, when she read a verse in Romans that said, in effect, that we can learn about God by looking at His creations, she decided to make a life’s work out of learning about the relationship between our thoughts, spirit, body, and mind through studying the creations of God here on the Earth. The parable of the sower, the garden of Eden, and the many references to plant life in the Bible take on new meaning with this perspective.
Here are some of my favorite insights:
- The seeds that fall on the soil of our hearts are the words that we hear (the word of God, compliments, feedback, insults, etc.). This means 1) the words we use are very important and 2) the word seeds we choose to cultivate affect our thoughts and actions.
- “Emotional wellbeing is our capacity and willingness to feel all our feelings.” As someone who doesn’t wear my heart on my sleeve, it makes intuitive sense that true wellbeing consists not of avoidance but of submission. This doesn’t mean we don’t have any effect on what or how we feel, but it does mean that strong-arming your feelings isn’t a sign of emotional health. Our emotional work is more accurately compared to gardening than fighting - the results are whole, beautiful, and take time (sometimes a long time).
- “In the garden we no longer idolize achieving in spite of our pain. We celebrate taking time to heal.” I am a natural struggler - I tend to not have the foresight needed to minimize the struggle and maximize the results of my actions. I believe doing difficult things is a fundamental part of growth in this life. I’m realizing that it’s silly to think that manufactured (or maybe avoidable is a better term) struggle is better than taking the time to consciously heal and prepare (with the caveat that there is something powerful about Peter’s example of diving headfirst into what you know God wants - maybe it’s just a difference in personality?).
My second time through this book, I got caught up (in a negative way) on a few points. I love the analogies she uses, but I got confused trying to keep straight the different emotions, body parts, plant types, and soil types. Because basically everything came in sets of three (heart, mind, body; silt, sand, clay; fear, anger, sadness; relationships, legacy, purpose) I was constantly trying to remember which soil type went with which emotion and which “life zone.” I’m sure reading the physical book would have helped keep those straight better.
I also didn’t agree with her take on the importance of expressing our anger. She said “good” anger comes as a response to someone crossing your personal boundaries (doing something that makes you uncomfortable) but that’s not at all what I learn from Jesus’ life or teachings. Anita espouses the fashionable view that we can’t celebrate anyone who has done something that is particularly bad.
concordance