What do you think?
Rate this book


230 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2009
Part I: Multicultural Leadership in the Worldwide Church gives us the author’s own story coupled with his model of Cross Cultural Leadership.
Part 2: Leadership and Culture takes the reader on a deep dive, examining the research describing the impact of culture on leadership values. The author examines leadership and culture theologically, contextually (communication, time, church, leadership), from the perspective of power, and from the perspective of individualism. This portion was thorough.
Part 3: Contextualizing Leadership "deals with the problem of how universal biblical truth intersects with diverse cultural values." (149)
Part 4: Global Leadership Practice "applies insights from the Bible and culture to practical issues in world mission and the global church." (186)I appreciate his holistic view of missions (Figure coming), but also the unapologetic view that “Evangelism is inviting people to come to Jesus, sharing the good news ‘that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures’ (1 Cor 15:3-4). . . the clear proclamation of the gospel is at the very heart of missions.” (52)
(1) Assess and acknowledge my own underlying cultural assumptions/biases about leadership;
(2) The Scriptures provide a multitude of leadership examples; which are principles of leadership for every culture (note: we usually see biblical principles through the eyeglasses of our culture); Cultural values relating to leadership are subconscious assumptions about how people think about power, handle ambiguity, prize individuality, achieve status or plan for the future. 70-71
(3) The greatest tensions in multicultural leadership arise from tension that grow out of internal (hidden) values.
(4) “Globalization means that people are looking more and more alike on the outside, but the inner layer of cultural values hasn’t changed very much.” (73)
(1) Low context (factory paradigm): mechanistic leaders who manage by objectives
(2) High context (wildflower paradigm): existential leaders who manage by interruption.
(3) Theology/Vision Driven: Pilgrim metaphor: “It is a vision for what people might look like if they would enroll as lifelong students in Jesus’ school of discipleship, consistently displaying the fruit of the Spirit. (190) The Pilgrim metaphor helps bridge the strengths of both low-context and high-context cultures while minimizing the differences between the two.7. Vision: “Vision describes a picture of the kingdom of God on earth and in heaven. The outcome of vision is transformed lives, demonstrating God’s love in individuals and the church. (192)
First, “The progress of revelation between the Old and New Testaments indicates a shift from higher to lower power-distance values” (102).
Second, “Scripture seems to leave room for some flexibility regarding power distance in leadership style but not in leadership attitudes” (102).This was a helpful summary statement: In light of the cultural variety and implications, “frank discussions about power distance need to take place at the beginning of the partnership relationship” on matters of leadership, collaboration, resources, decision-making and ownership (104).
In a single African country we find three substantially different cultural assumptions about leadership development. Leadership development in these three cultures took place though loyalty to a patron (Hausa), individual effort (Igbo) and royal lineage (Yoruba). Few of the American assumptions about leadership would be culturally appropriate in traditional Nigeria. It would be absurd to expect that a foreign “expert” could teach a leadership course in Nigeria without an understanding of the traditional cultural assumptions about how leaders are developed. (203)How to broaden cross-cultural perspectivism: How can egocentric and family-centric leaders move toward seeing the world from an ever-broadening perspective? Most studies show that perspective transformation is not learned through courses on theories of leadership or elaborate management techniques. Perspective transformation develops by reflecting on disequilibrating experiences and through disorienting dilemmas. (205) This was the way God grew Moses.