I was a Psychology major and am still very fascinated by the subject, so I can definitely get into the psychology themes. Knocked a star off for an overly complicated plot line: an ever-growing cast of characters that ends up taking so many pages to explain how they were all involved/implicated that it leaves me with two conclusions: 1) even the author eventually realized how complicated it had become and knew he had to do a good deal of explaining at the end to make it make sense for the reader, or have to rewrite the preceding 375 pages; and 2) it's still confusing and even though I only finished it an hour ago I'd probably still struggle to explain everyone's part. There's a domestic dispute turned homicide and attempted homicide, a plane crash, multiple burglaries (one with a physical attack on a main character), a house explosion, another murder, an attempted murder, financial shenanigans regarding investment in a restaurant, sexual affairs, sexual abuse of patients, yet another murder (of one of the "bad guys" whose roles in this web is more complicated and hard to understand than anyone else's), a poorly played out hostage situation, and child sexual abuse literally thrown in at the end.
Knocked another star off because the main characters seem to be intentionally obtuse. They spend so much time being judgmental know-it-alls about everyone else that they miss, like, everything actually important. Merideth is borderline narcissistic (everything her way, doesn't want Alan until it seems he doesn't want her, argues in the divorce about a rug she apparently desperately wants from their house yet has managed to live a year and a half without, trying to manipulate Alan into reconciling with a pregnancy, which may or may not be his, which may or may not be real for all we know - he says at one point her breasts were fuller but every other physical description of her emphasizes her flat stomach, and overall no one ever mentions any other early-pregnancy symptoms such as moodiness (like Adrienne is described as having), morning sickness, etc. Basically she says she's pregnant and her boobs are bigger so everyone takes her word for it.) And these two psychologists can't see that Alan's love for her is and probably always has mirrored the love a person has for their narcissistic partner: they spend most of their time wanting more from them, knowing they give way more than they get emotionally, and so just live for the moments when they are "rewarded" for their one-sided love and devotion. And instead of realizing that his relationship with Merideth created emotional baggage that makes it difficult for Alan to trust women like Lauren who supposedly want and love him but become emotionally distant at the drop of a hat, they just say Alan has intimacy issues - as in, he thinks he wants intimacy but really he doesn't???
Ultimately the mix of "judgy" and obtuse make Alan annoying. He had a head cold and was miserable. After a description of how he felt in EVERY sentence throughout that entire chapter...WE GET IT. If you're so sick, stay home instead of being a martyr. After at least 150 (I'm estimating) references to Sam's diet/appetite...WE GET IT. You're a health nut and he's not. I know from a later book that Sam has a heart attack and ends up changing his diet, so this may be a setup for that to happen later, but the references are so constant and condescending it just makes Alan sound like a pretentious jerk who can't help being disgusted in Sam'sdining presence. The "wizardry" of an alarm system is so complex that a PhD needs a 30 minute explanation of how to put in a code to disarm it, and being so stubborn about having to overcome this Everest of an obstacle outweighs the fact that a gunman came in and held a gun to his cheek, shot 2 people (almost 3), and then their office was burglarized? This is the equivalent of today's memes about grandmothers having to ask their grandkids how to work the tv remote but complaining about everything that's on tv anyway. Sam has to tell him how Russ London was involved, instead of Alan putting two-and-two together with the references to 1981 in both London's and Tobias's files. Alan actually seriously considers that Paul Weinman might have been the therapist abusing Marilyn London, despite the fact that both times Marilyn talks to him about the abuse, she talks about the abuse and the later threat from her therapist in the present tense despite the fact that Paul's death occurred before the events in the book even began. After Alan learns that Larry Templeton had anosmia, the next time he sees Rita he says something like "he probably didn't like your baking" and she's in utter shock with "how did you know that" and they both completely forget that SHE TOLD HIM THAT when she served her muffins to Alan and Randy. Maybe that was just White forgetting he had written that and not another example of Alan overlooking the obvious so he can "ingeniously" come to the same conclusion through a more complicated series of steps later.
I also don't understand the rules of confidentiality and crimes. Alan knew that Marilyn's therapist was sexually abusing her and threatened her if she were to expose him, and then she is murdered. If there are rules of confidentiality barring a therapist helping with a murder investigation in which his client was the victim and knows there is someone with a clear motive, White should have explained it better rather than leaving Alan to feeling like he had to protect that information no matter what. I mean, his client was MURDERED and the way he acts about it as if keeping her "secrets" about an evil therapist with a clear motive were more important than catching said therapist and likely murderer.
I KNOW I really loved these books when I first read them 10+ years ago so I'm going to keep trucking on and hope that Alan gets a little less pedantic and a little more self-aware.