Rise Of The Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet

by Jim Mann

When G.W. Bush campaigned for the White House, he was such a novice in foreign policy that he couldn't name the president of Pakistan. But he was advised by a group that called themselves the Vulcans--a group of men & one woman with long & shared experience in government, dating back to the Nixon, Ford, Reagan & 1st Bush administrations. After retuning to power in 2001, the Vulcans--including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage & Condoleeza Rice--were widely expected to restore US foreign policy to what it had been in past Republican administrations. Instead, they put America on an entirely new course, adopting a far-reaching set of ideas & policies that changed the world & America's role in it. In this revelatory volume, James Mann narrates the hidden story of these six history makers, their early careers & rise to power, the interactions & underlying tensions among them, their visions & their roles in the current administration. Along the way, he offers a wealth of new information (about how Rumsfeld schemed in the Nixon White House, how Cheney toiled as Rumsfeld's doorkeeper, how Wolfowitz first warned of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East in the 1960s) to complete a remarkable look at George W. Bush's inner circle.

Genres: Politics, History, Nonfiction, War, American History, Biography, The United States Of America

426 pages, Paperback

First published March 1, 2004

Reviews

[Will Byrnes · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is an excellent book. It details a subset of the larger Vulcan group, neocons with a root in the Nixon era. It is best when pointing out the plans that were constructed in the early 90’s, plans in which it is made clear that the twin goals of this crew were to ensure continued access to mideast oil, not so much to ensure cheap supplies, but to ensure secure supplies, and to prevent hostile powers from controlling that resource. The other goal was to spread liberal democracy to the middle east. The notion was that extremism was an outgrowth of the autocratic regimes of the area and installing democracy would remove the source of that extremism. In a sense it was an idealistic notion.


James Mann - from his Twitter pages

There is also much here about the personal relationships of the various players. It is clear that Colin Powell was never a true insider although he did not exactly stand in the way. His gripe was in form, not substance.

The Vulcan orientation was foreign policy. Domestic policy simply did not appear on their radar. Thus they are not factors in the mad tax-cutting of the Bush administration. Much detail here. It clarifies a fair bit. A must read, particularly as the notions embraced by this group are very much alive in powerful elements of our foreign policy establishment, even today.

=============================EXTRA STUFF

Links to the author’s personal, Twitter, and FB pages

[Cwn_annwn_13 · Rating 1 out of 5]

Rise of the Vulcans is more or less combined mini biographies of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Colin Powell, Richard Armitage and Condoleezza Rice. This book is a great sucess if the goal was to make a psychopathic criminal demons in human form out to be semi-normal human beings.

According to this book Armitage had nothing to do with Operation Phoenix. It actually claims he had a great love for the Vietnamese people. Which of course is why he went to Vietnam to kill them. Also Colin Powell didn't participate in the coverup of the My Lai massacre or do his part to get America into the quagmire in Iraq by lying through his teeth in front of the United Nations. Cheney was never secretly a high ranking member of the CFR all the while playing the game of being a non globalist political outsider to the voters. Rumsfeld never made the push to make Aspartame legal to put into the food supply and help cause multiple health problems, including cancer in the American people. Hilariously at one point he is actually portrayed as discouraging lying to the public to politicians he worked for. Wolfowitz hasn't been on the fringes trying to goad America into wars with various nations going back to the 1970s. Wolfowitz actually makes that psycho Henry Kissinger look like an anti-war activist. In case you didn't pick up on the random sarcasm interjected in this review it is more or less a mainstream neo-con coverup version of these creeps history.

[AC · Rating 1 out of 5]

A missed opportunity, given the author's unprecedented access -- and one that proved, quite spectacularly, to underestimate their malice and deceptiveness and sheer incompetence.

[Emmet Sullivan · Rating 2 out of 5]

Won’t stick with me. The “group biography” structure struck me as messy, and the book as a whole lacks a clear argument or storyline that’s necessary to pull together a bunch of other biographical snippets that are often only tangentially related to one another. I’m not even sure what this book was supposed to really be about. There’s no argument, no conclusions, and no real depth.

[Korin: A Crone Running Amok · Rating 5 out of 5]

Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, and Condoleeza Rice; they were GW Bush’s foreign policy brain trust & they reefed to themselves as ‘The Vulcans’. They brought with them years of government service in Republican administrations. Experience they were going to put to work for us. Mann looks at their early careers & the friendship & tensions among them.
A thorough look at the inner workings of the post 9/11 white house, what really drove decisions & how we were & are affected by it. At times dry & hard to wade through but well worth the effort.

[Erik Graff · Rating 4 out of 5]

Picked this one up at the library in Bridgman, Michigan a couple of weeks ago and have been reading it, off and on, at the local cafe in the East Rogers Park neighborhood of Chicago.

Unlike all Woodward's current history books, this one offers no startling revelations or insider's secrets. It is more like a regular history book than a piece of journalism. Indeed, Mann probably even wrote it himself.

The books covers several themes. First, it is a history of the evolution of Republican foreign policy administration from Nixon, through Ford, Reagan and the two Bushes. Second, it is a history of the rise of neoconservatism out of the right wing of the Democratic party. Third, it presents professional biographies of its principals: Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Armitage, Rice and Powell. Fourth, it attempts to correct some common misconceptions such as, for instance, the popular beliefs that Colin Powell was a dove in uniform or that Dick Cheney ever turned to the right. Throughout, George W. Bush is in the background, not being a particularly important player as regards the formulation of foreign policy principles or objectives.

[Andrew · Rating 5 out of 5]

Wonderful, insightful, revealing, long-view look at Bush's war cabinet. Reading this after Peter Rodman's "Presidential Command", where Henry Kissinger's former assistant looks at how foreign policy was made in post-WWII America through the lens of process, not character, I found Mann's argument that ideas - and people - matter refreshing
. Would love to read another of Mann's books. Not sure, though, if I'm up to he's latest on the falling out between Cheney and Powell quite yet.

[Nina · Rating 4 out of 5]

Explains so much about the Iraq War. I finally understand how America adopted preemptive war as a strategic doctrine. This book made me hugely sympathetic to Colin Powell, who seems like the only reasonable Vulcan. Mann's comparison between Powell and Zhou Enlai really explained the whole dynamic quite well. I'm infinitely less sympathetic to Condolezza Rice after reading about her role in the 2002 NSS, her attitude toward Clinton's Russia policy, and the leadership role she played in Bush II's foreign policy team. Cheney, Wolfowitz, and Rumsfeld remain tools, in that order.

[Carson Stones · Rating 2 out of 5]

I recently picked this book off my shelf because I had fond memories of it from my neolib days, circa 2010-2012, and I was interested to revisit the early Bush era now that we’re two administrations removed from it. I am sorry to say that not only has this book not aged well, but I’m not certain it was even good back when it was originally published in 2004. The author has this annoying habit of presenting damning evidence that his principle characters - Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, Powell, and Armitage - were not only wrong in their predictions but also fabricated evidence to launch a disastrous military crusade, only to follow those allegations up with rhetorical questions like: “Was this wrong? Who can say?”

My principle criticism is that the entire book feels like a build up to the 2nd Iraq War - why did we invade? Who was calling the shots? How did they get into those positions and what motivated their decision making?- and the moment the story reaches that point, the author decides to abruptly end the book.

He spends hundreds of pages telling this compelling story about the rise of the neo-conservative foreign policy establishment who came of age in the traumatic years after Vietnam and personally oversaw the defeat of the Soviet Union, the end of the Cold War, and the first Iraq war. His thesis is that the worldview of “The Vulcans” (a term that never really stuck and wasn’t well defined in my opinion), was formed during the period 1968-1991 and was tested and pushed to the limits from 2001-2003. And even though he spends all this time supposedly building up to the obvious climax of Mission Accomplished and the subsequent and obvious failure of everything their worldview predicted, he just... lets them off the hook.

With all the interviews and research he did, the evidence was clear and the story drives itself to the natural conclusion - so nail their asses to the wall! They were wrong about everything and history will not be kind to them. A better author would have thrust the dagger in using the weight of his own evidence, but James Mann simply refused to do it and I’m not going to spend any more time thinking about why he didn’t.

[The American Conservative]

'And of all the books so far, James Mann’s work on “the Vulcans”—while not as charmingly salacious, politically angry, and gut-personal as the Bob Woodward, Paul O’Neill, and Richard Clarke books—is a particularly valuable contribution, perhaps one that will come to stand as The Best and the Brightest of the Iraq War. Its value lies not only in the consummate fairness of the author’s judgments (sometimes too fair, actually) but in the fact that Mann roves back in history meticulously and conscientiously to pull out the skeletons of these new foreign-policy ideologies of the Bush team and examine their DNA.'

Read the full review, "Bush's Six-Pack," on our website:
http://www.theamericanconservative.co...

[Michael Solomentsev · Rating 3 out of 5]

Very thoroughly researched book. Really got a better perspective on these folks. My biggest problem is that Mann seems unable to acknowledge the obvious - that the Vulcans weren't necessarily sincere in their beliefs. I think this really mars the book as a whole, because Mann is basically forced to portray them as being almost naive in their belief of the value of 'spreading democracy'. These guys are clearly some evil fuckers, so Mann's inability to criticize them is a clear flaw.

[Leew49 · Rating 5 out of 5]

American never saw 9/11 coming (though perhaps we should have), but the Bush administration's response to that horrific moment was grounded philosophically in ideas and careers dating back as far in some cases as the Nixon administration.

The Vulcans, referencing the Roman god of fire, were a self-christened group of highly experienced and impressively credentialed neoconservatives within the Republican party who advocated for a more aggressive foreign policy predicated on American's unchallengeable military superiority and a moral commitment to democracy. Mann focuses on perhaps the six most influential Vulcans, all of whom, after years in government service with occasional forays into the private sector, served important and influential roles in the George W Bush administration: Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his second in command Paul Wolfowitz, Secretary of State Colin Powell and his second in command Richard Armitage.

Their hero was Winston Churchill, who resisted tyranny and gave a full-throated defense of democratic institutions, but their philosophical inspiration came from Leo Strauss, a political philosopher who argued against moral relativism and the accommodation of tyranny while advocating for the classical ideal of an elite group of advisers guiding national policy. An early neocon from the ranks of the Democrats, Jeane Kirkpatrick, had argued against Jimmy Carter's attempts to foster democracy in other nations, especially Iran, in her essay "Dictatorships and Double Standards," but a more aggressive and idealistic outlook on the part of the neocons gradually began to prevail over the decades.

Aside from their philosophical underpinnings, the Vulcans were strongly influenced by historical and political developments during the second half of the Twentieth Century: the need to rebuild American's military after Viet Nam and the Iranian rescue debacle, the collapse of Russia and the end of the Cold War, 9/11 and the advent of stateless terrorism, and the perceived danger of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in unfriendly regimes that might be sympathetic to terrorist organizations.

Conservative thinking underwent a sea change from the old Nixonian approach of detente, realpolitik, maintaining a balance of power, reliance on allies, and the use of the military purely for self-defense to a new, more aggressive philosophy of unilateral, preemptive action based on American's vast military superiority, thumbnailed by the phrase "shock and awe," and moral commitment to democracy and free markets overseas. Earlier realpolitik advocates like Brent Scowcroft and James Baker provided a counterargument which never gained traction in the post-9/11 environment.

Vulcan thinking culminated in the second invasion of Iraq, a remarkable military achievement followed by a political and military fiasco during the occupation. Three Vulcan assumptions proved to be without substance: 1. Once America went into action, her allies would fall into line. 2. WMD in Iraq as casus belli. 3. The enthusiastic response of the Iraqi people to the removal of Hussein by the American liberators. The Vulcan philosophy carried them only so far. Their pursuit of unrivaled American power eventually took them beyond the will and political support of the American people, especially when their assumptions led them into the realm of nation/region building.

[James · Rating 4 out of 5]

Mann gives a full picture of thirty years of conservative thought on foreign policy through 6 people. It's not quite his fault that three of these people (Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz) are unredeemable opportunistic monsters who change their opinions on nearly every subject to satisfy their massive egos. However, the monstrousness of these three men makes it incredibly difficult to figure out what Mann might say about the goals and aims of conservative thought, so he settles on a general war-like disposition, a "Vulcan" mentality. It's a noble effort, and does throw a strange light on the less monstrous members of the Cabinet. Rice, Powell, and Armitage seem to be committed bureaucrats trying to get some stuff done among the chaos of the Republican Party's lies and misdirections over the past thirty years. It's not a surprise that their more measured, pragmatic voices were overwhelmed by the other three, and the whole story offers a pessimistic kind of allegory for what success means in the modern Republican party in Washington: being loud and forceful with no clear plan, ignoring all normal operating principles, relishing the chance to dunk on opponents, etc.

[Emilly · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is the best book to read if you want an unbiased take on the Iraq war. The author goes back all the war to the Vietnam war and Richard Nixon, so you really do learn about the people who made one of the most consequential decisions.

[Reilly Smith · Rating 4 out of 5]

Extremely good - almost glad it was written at a moment in time (2004) as opposed to having a post-mortem overlay. Was overly policy heavy, which probably made sense at the time but doesn’t quite hold up considering every single character was utterly devalued in the coming years.

[Aaron · Rating 5 out of 5]

My foreign policy view is radically altered after reading Mann's book.

[Steve · Rating 2 out of 5]

Well researched. But , like watching paint dry. Just not for me.

[Dale · Rating 5 out of 5]

An outstanding history of President Bush's war cabinet. Explain who they were and where they came from. I learned a lot about the people and their motivations. Recommended for my strategic thinkers.

[SalvatoreBe Balls · Rating 5 out of 5]

Full of interesting info on the previous careers of the people I most knew for dominating headlines in the early/mid 2000s

[Turgut · Rating 5 out of 5]

Extremely informative and highly relevant book. Great research involved as well. Recommended.

[Tyler Schwinn · Rating 5 out of 5]

Excellent book

[Dave N · Rating 5 out of 5]

A really detailed and incisive look at Bush's war cabinet and every bit as damning as Halberstam's The Best and the Brightest. Mann goes the extra length to point towards how previous stints in the defense system helps explain the decisions that led to Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as to show how the cabinet helped to shield Bush from a more nuanced view of what was going on in both theaters. I definitely recommend reading a full biography of Bush before touching this, though.

[Rajesh Kurup · Rating 4 out of 5]

Excellent, engaging book about the cast that led us to the disastrous wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Mann's strength is that he provides a non-partisan background to the people and the times that influenced them.
When W was elected, I felt that he had picked the perfect team to settle the problems of the 70s. Many of his team had experience in the Nixon and Ford administration. Mann points out that, in fact, their backgrounds actually began even earlier in Vietnam. It was the reaction to the reactions to Vietnam that pushed the neocons to become so extremely hawkish. As he points out, the common view, typified by was that America was in decline after Vietnam. As a result, Kissinger pushed for detante with Russia and China. The Vulcans countered by wanting to make America's military so strong that there would be no other conceivable threats. Even after the fall of the Soviet Union, they pushed an agenda to kill off the idea of a "peace dividend." Rather than downscale the military once the US became the only superpower, keep spending levels high so that no other country could emerge as a competitor.
It's interesting that the background begins in the late 60s through the Iraq war of the 2000s. That period is dominated by Republican presidents with the exception of Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. Since Clinton didn't appreciably downsize the military, this long extended rule allowed the Vulcans to get the US military to the current state in which the US has a military budget equal to that of all other nations combined. Thanks, guys.

[Sean Sullivan · Rating 4 out of 5]

The best book on the personalities that made up the first Bush term, and believe me, I have read a bunch of them. All the Woodward books and other beltway books of the season come and go, but Mann’s book I think will be seen as the best contemporary accounting of the personalities from the first terms( Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Ashcroft, Powell, Armitage, Wolfowitz, etc, etc) that you’re going to find. This is obvious a book that is highly critical of all the figures in that presidency, but not the propagandistic way other books are. Mann is harsh, but fair and does an especially good job of explaining what the hell neoconservatives actually is* and the really nasty hatred between the Cheney people and the Powell people. Even after however many years, this is still essential reading for political junkies.

*Now a days we all know, but when this came out, and I read it, I think the term was thrown around a lot by people who didn’t really understand its meaning.

[Marius · Rating 4 out of 5]

Interesting and neutral (perhaps overly so) summary of the historical movements of the group of people who became instrumental in orchestrating the Iraq war and the philosophies they used to justify it. Seeing their actions as a continuous thread of history is the book's strongest point, bridging the Cold War and connecting it with the ideological pre-emptive strike mentality that dominated the foreign policy of the Bush II administration.

I understand the need for a neutral viewpoint, but I do wish the author would have gone into deeper possible critiques of the Vulcans' self-justified and aggressive world view. In particular, their naivete in assuming Iraqis would embrace the invasion and simplified assumptions of an end game is touched on very lightly. An examination of the mixing of political and business interests of Bush, Cheney etc. is also absent.

[Jennifer Aupke · Rating 4 out of 5]

James Mann completes a thorough review of the rise to power of all of the most influential and prominent members of President G.W. Bush's war cabinet. Ending the book with an analysis of the decision to invade Iraq in 2003, Mann analyzes the members seperately in the positions they take before, during and after the conflict, comparing their actions to the philosophies they espoused during their political careers. One open ended point that Mann should consider revisiting is the eventual success of the Bush cabinet to meet its goal of influencing societal movement toward democracy in the Middle East through its toppling of Saddam Hussein and the recent Arab Spring that may be attributed to it. A well written read with curious nuances that pique interest in further research.

[Shea Mastison · Rating 5 out of 5]

The Presidency of George Bush is quite likely too recent to assess on any macroscopic level. It was a total rupture with the Cold War era, and the heady days of "post-historical" Clintonian America. The paradigm shift itself was made all the more extraordinary by the men and women who happened to define American foreign policy after 9/11.

This is an excellent examination of that group, termed "the Vulcans" by Mann. He dissects their ideological base (or subsequent lack of one) while explaining the circumstances in which they were put to practice.

If modern history is your thing, check this book out.

[Marty · Rating 4 out of 5]

Great background on how and why our government and country is in the mess it is currently in around the world, of course with special attention to Iraq and the Middle East. Great background information on Rumsfeld, Rice, Wolfowitz, Powell, Armitage, and others. It is important to know who the advisers to the next President will be....what do they stand for; how do they see the world. (By the way, did you know the Rumsfeld was a white house "aid" during Nixon years---and he was against the vietnam war!!!)

[Benj FitzPatrick · Rating 4 out of 5]

This in depth look of Condi, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Armitage, Cheney, and Powell moved chronologically from the 60s until 2004. If nothing else, it cemented how closely intertwined their careers were from the 70s onward. Aside from this central point, the comparison between their cold-war policies and the post-9/11 ones were fascinating. It was a bit of a slow read b/c the story hopped between the 6 at each time point. I think this was the optimal approach, but it fragmented each person's story line and made tying an individual's accomplishments a bit difficult.

[Tom · Rating 4 out of 5]

This is an excellent look at the movers and shakers of President Bush's war room. The interconnections between these (mostly) men and their ties to the Nixon and Reagan administrations should leave everyone well aware of how these people operate.

I thought it was a great read, and worth looking into to get a better understanding of our current foreign policy situation.