This book seemed so unrealistic and inauthentic. Maybe because I'm not educated on the things she was writing about, but here are the things I disliked about After the War:
(note: haven't read it in forever, this is from a piece of paper I found while cleaning out my closet, and I decided I might as well post it to get rid of the paper lol so there are only cons, because that's how I roll.)
- the main character doesn't act like someone who's been through trauma, she heals super quickly
- found it odd that she's the only one who can't be in the bunkers bc they remind her of Auschwitz. Every concentration camp had bunkers so wouldn't all the kids (or at very least, some of the kids) be scared of going down?
- also odd that she gets over her fear of the bunkers so quickly
- Jonathan's mood swing after his story is confusing and weird, because he immediately starts crying and throwing things right after he was fine, and telling her his history. Maybe this is how trauma works, I just found it way too abrupt, like a light switch. If it had happened during his telling the story, or if it had happened after a little while after his story, it would have felt more realistic. Again, don't know what trauma is like, so it could be very similar to real life.
- the two or three kids who told her their stories, none of that felt authentic (like the stories plus the kids plus the way they tell them, none of it seems authentic/realistic) and maybe she's just a bad writer but it felt stilted and forced.
- the romance between her and Zvi is really weird and moves abnormally fast like they're fifteen and he's already kissing her on the mouth? That's way too much for these young, traumatized kids. And if some kid did that to me, even if I had a crush on him, I wouldn't hang around him anymore. Also, I'm not a guy so I wouldn't know (tho neither is the author), but if I were him, I wouldn't want her to know how puppy-love I was. And I would pretend I just saw her as a friend bc I wouldn't want to be so vulnerable. That's how I am irl and I'm a) a girl, so prob more emotional and b) not traumatized by torture/starvation/sights like being left behind by all the stable adults in my life, most of which I saw die or knew were walking to their deaths. I wouldn't let myself be that vulnerable with anyone, let alone a girl (boy, in my case) my age. Just my thoughts. So it's weird to me that he's not embarrassed about anything when it comes to love and Ruth.
- the way they act towards each other when it comes to romance is just awkward, stilted, and super unrealistic. That's just not how a 15 year old girl and boy would act. This writer has no clue.
- The way she talks doesn't seem 15-year-old to me. Maybe it's because she's been through so much, but it just feels inauthentic and is hard to imagine. The way she reacts tot hings and the way she talks/responds to others, the convos she has with them, are just weird - I guess, just not like real people? idk whatever, I can't put my finger on it
I haven't read the book in like three years, this was towards the beginning of high school that I picked it up. idk what age group it's meant for, but obviously I've aged out of it. I should go back and reread sometime, just so I can mention some of the pros, but I don't remember them, if there are any. It's a pretty short book, quick read - doesn't go very deep, or have many plot/story lines, so wouldn't hurt to pick it up and try it out, idk. Wasn't enjoyable to me, but like whatever.