الكتاب يشكل إضافة نوعية تدعم البعد السياسي والتاريخي والديني وغيرها من الأبعاد المختلفةالتي استثمرت فيها الكاتبة تخصصها الأكاديمي بكفاءة عاليةمن مدخل الليبرالية تلج المؤلفة دروب الصهيونية المعقدة من منظور علم النفس . إن البعد النفسي حول موضوع الكتاب ، والوثائق القيمة به يشهدان للمؤلفة بأنه لم يتطرق أحد بمثل هذا العمق والشفافية حول الموضوع ، ومن هنا فالكتاب يشكل إضافة نوعية تدعم البعد السياسي والتاريخي والديني وغيرها من الأبعاد
Jacqueline Rose, FBA (born 1949, London) is a British academic who is currently Professor of Humanities at the Birkbeck Institute for the Humanities.
Rose was born into a non-practicing Jewish family. Her elder sister was the philosopher Gillian Rose. Jacqueline Rose is known for her work on the relationship between psychoanalysis, feminism and literature. She is a graduate of St Hilda's College, Oxford and gained her higher degree (maîtrise) from the Sorbonne, Paris and her doctorate from the University of London.
Her book Albertine, a novel from 2001, is a feminist variation on Marcel Proust's À la recherche du temps perdu.
She is best known for her critical study on the life and work of American poet Sylvia Plath, The Haunting of Sylvia Plath, published in 1991. In the book, Rose offers a postmodernist feminist interpretation of Plath's work, and criticises Plath's husband Ted Hughes and other editors of Plath's writing. Rose describes the hostility she experienced from Hughes and his sister (who acts as literary executor to Plath's estate) including threats received from Hughes about some of Rose's analysis of Plath's poem "The Rabbit Catcher". The Haunting of Sylvia Plath was critically acclaimed, and itself subject to a famous critique by Janet Malcolm in her book The Silent Woman: Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes.
Rose is a regular broadcaster on and contributor to the London Review of Books.
Rose's States of Fantasy was the inspiration for composer Mohammed Fairouz's Double Concerto of the same title.
The 1st 2 chapters which focus on messianism and psychoanalysis are far too historical, it's the 3rd chapter really worth reading for analysis of the politics of Zionism.
Great quote summary: "Arab aggression is not provoked by Jewish settlement of the land; it is not a response to dispossession. It is a challenge to the Jewish people not to capitulate to their own past."
Otherwise you're fine sticking with books by Friedman and Zakaria
I recommend this book to anyone seeking to understand why and how the Zionist project went wrong. 'The Question of Zion' is not anti-Zionist, as someone claims, it is an act of courage by a scholar who isn't shy to deconstruct the myths that underpin political discourse in Israel. Jewish readers with an open-mind will appreciate Jacqueline Rose's effort. All readers will gain a better understanding of the history and ideological premises of Zionism.
A very interesting analysis of the Zionist project, delving much further back than the invention of the modern state of Israel. Jacqueline uses her political and psychoanalytic skills well here and provides a very unique perspective.
I found the book insightful, and Jacqueline's perspective expanded my knowledge on the impact of Zionism on the world, especially on both Jewish people and Palestinians.
While I didn’t agree with every point (and in a book of theory, one never should) I thought the psychoanalysis of Zionism, especially that of a Jewish woman, was both fascinating and eye opening. She asked many of the questions I ask myself and others, and dealt thoughtfully with detractors on all sides. Highly recommend for anyone interested in Zionism or Israel/Palestine.
Interesting material. A psychanalysis of Zionism, based mostly on Arendt, Sholem and selection of first Zionists (Herzl, Ahd ha Am & Ben Gurion). I didnt like the writing style though, too tiring. Overall it gave me food for thought
found this to be a very interesting book even if I am not the biggest fan of psychoanalysis. definitely a different perspective on the foundations of zionism, but one that I am glad I engaged with.
I’m glad I read this book. It’s an odd book. It’s small, but it’s taking on a big challenge. The author is (in a way) giving a psycho analytic reading of the Zionism. She makes her argument - but because she has to shorten it for the length of the book - it’s hard to judge it on its own merits. She certainly has given me a lot to chew on - that I hadn’t thought of before. These seemingly intractable problems of the Middle East aren’t offered solutions here (which many books I’ve read on the subject do offer - but I think this is a good contribution, by inviting the reader to step back and see what is really going on (from her perspective at least) - which may then suggest some possible answers.