As I continue my backward trip through the Karen Pirie series, I come to A DARKER DOMAIN, which is officially #2 in the sequence. Except that, in reality, it’s the first real Karen Pirie novel, as she only played a bit part in “The Distant Echo”.
I did appreciate the backward look at “The Distant Echo” that we got when Karen visited former DI James Lawson, but our brief view of Lawson is the only thing that ties these two books together.
This is a difficult book to rate—internally I give it 4.5 stars—for the reasons described below. After waffling back and forth, I ended up giving it a four-star rating. For all it’s positive points, its format really bothered me; in my eyes, this kept this from being a top-level read.
FORMAT
-1 out of 10 for the writing format.
The entire book consists of ONE chapter. That means NO BREAKS to signal time, place, or POV changes. Consequently, after following Karen Pirie in Fife, Scotland, and the beginning of a case that interests Karen, we suddenly switch to Bel, a woman visiting Tuscany without warning or explanation. Confusing? Definitely. A confusion that could have easily been cleared up by starting a new chapter focusing on Bel. I assume that many simply stopped reading here, or that those who continued on found the plot confusing with far too many characters and storylines.
I continued reading, primarily because I wanted to return to Karen Pirie, and about the 35% point, started to notice the small italic print on the left-hand side of the pages that indicated time/place shifts—not all the shifts, but many of them. Then the story became more flowing. But having to read 35% of a novel before it becomes easy-to-read is unwarranted.
CHARACTERS
9 out of 10
I continued reading because of the great characterization, and I definitely prefer character-based writing to novels that stress plot. This is the first time we get a good picture of Karen Pirie, and what a wonderful lead detective she is. In the manner of many in this genre, she is flawed, but not because of a conflicted past (like many investigators in crime thrillers) but because of self-doubt about her physical attractiveness. Around thirty, she is short, somewhat pudgy, and average looking. In her mind, she is ”a wee fat woman crammed into a Marks and Spencer suit, mid-brown hair needing a visit to a hairdresser, might be pretty if you could see the definition of her bones under the flesh.” She has low self-esteem because she is not tall, svelte, and elegant. Many women can identify with her. Karen is not addicted to alcohol or cigarettes; she loves eating. Criminals and witnesses could seldom fool Karen, but when it came to food, she could fool herself seventeen ways before breakfast.
Karen has a crush on her co-worker, Phil—as she did in the earlier novel, “The Distant Echo”. But here it is more explicit, and whereas in “The Distant Echo” they were of equal rank, in A DARKER DOMAIN, Karen now outranks Phil (DI Karen Pirie versus DS Phil Parhatka) precisely because of events that took place in that earlier novel. But Phil is still a close friend because he ”finds her mind sexy.”
In THE DARKER DOMAIN, we are also introduced to the third member of Karen’s team, The Mint—a brief introduction that will be fleshed out in later novels of this series.
The second main character in this novel is Bel Richmond, a journalist who is somewhat older than Karen (maybe in her forties?), and although never physically described, is confident about her overall appearance and it’s effect on others. In both appearance and demeanour, Bel is a counterpoint to Karen, but both women share several common traits—intelligence, curiosity, and a burning desire to discover the truth. I didn’t care for Bel in the same way I loved Karen, but I admired her doggedness and ambition.
Then there are the villains, and there are several. Not one is a stereotypical criminal. Perhaps Sir Broderick Macllenan Grant is the closest to a stereotype in terms of super-wealthy, cold-blooded industry titan, but even he has unexpected traits. I’m not going to name the other villains because that would mean moving into spoiler territory.
PLOT
8 out of 10
There are two main storylines that took place in the past (1984) in Fife, Scotland, and one occurring in the present (2007) that begins in Tuscany and soon moves to Scotland.
The first case to catch Karen’s interest is that of Mick Prentice, who disappeared after he supposedly broke ranks and worked as a scab in Nottingham during a devastating miners’ strike of 1984. There’s also the baffling disappearance of Mick’s best friend, Andy, around the same time. (The view back in time to see the damage caused by the strike—within families, within the community—is a major strength of this novel.) The more Karen and Phil delve into this case, the more unlikely it appears that Mick just walked away.
The second case is one given to Karen by her superior, the Macaroon—a kidnapping and murder that also took place in 1984 and was never solved. Sir Broderick Macllenan Grant’s daughter and young grandson were kidnapped by a group of purported anarchists, a ransom was paid, but Grant’s daughter, Catriona, died in the mayhem, his grandson disappeared, and the anarchists never reappeared. New evidence found in Tuscany by Bel Richmond suggests that at least one of the kidnapers is still alive. To me, it was immediately obvious who initiated the kidnapping plot, and what went wrong, but inexplicably, no other character in the story, including Karen, seem to notice the obvious. To me this was a weak storyline, but it was needed to tie the other parts together.
Events taking place at Tuscany in 2007 involve a possible murder and a tie to the 1984 kidnapping case—a cue unearthed by Bel but then followed up by Karen.
Altogether, wonderfully complex.
THE ENDING
6 out of 10
McDermid seems to have difficulty with endings. Here, the various plot lines are tied up so quickly that I had to read the last section three times to ensure that everything ended satisfactorily.