Whilst I wouldn't normally venture to write a review, it seems a shame that a book this accomplished doesn't have one. So here are my thoughts. (Please bear in mind it's been a couple of months since I finished the book.)
The protagonist, Aubrey Tearle, is a retired (yet accomplished) proofreader, fighting a familiar battle against redundancy; not only of his profession - which is increasingly irrelevant to the society he sees himself as serving, but of the society in which he has found a comfortable niche. Bit by bit, he sees the things that he holds dear slowly crumbling around him, usurped by meaningless consumerism and coarse behaviour. Apartheid is seldom explicitly mentioned, but the context of the novel is dependent upon it's slow and continual unravelling.
We're given a compelling insight into Tearle's world. He's fusty, anal, and consider's himself a defender of the moral good. There are frequent exercises in wordplay, as one might expect from a proofreader, and whole paragraphs devoted to the intricacies of grammar and vocabulary. In short, it's a pedant's treasure, and I was quite frequently lulled into thinking that I had a trait or two in common with Tearle, which certainly took me aback.
The story does not have a frenetic pace - the action taking place over a couple of weeks - but there aren't any significant dormant periods and I finished the book quickly. As part of Tearle's crusade, a chapter is devoted to his own short story, which is a good work of surreal fiction in it's own right, and a welcome reprieve from the banality of Tearle's story.
Readers familiar with other South African writers such as Andre Brink and J.M. Coetzee will notice the similarity of style, clear, concise prose and neatly constructed fiction. In many ways, this is it's biggest pitfall; the academic style doesn't really distinguish it from those others. I can't help but feel that the plot is also not particularly orignal, notwithstanding the 'futile resistance' theme playing out effectively and compellingly through a different, yet recognisable set of characters.
Of course, there is some liberation towards the end of the novel, and for all those pitfalls (which wouldn't necessarily bother those who hadn't read Brink or Coetzee) it was a rewarding read, made better - surprisingly so, in retrospect - by allusions to other works by Vladislavic, notably The Loss Library.
Is this worth reading? Whenever I reccommend a book to someone, I always ask myself the question: Is it worth reading again? Yes it is.