This work is the novelized biography of Luís Carlos Prestes (1898-1990), written as part of the amnesty campaign for the communist leader. During the Estado Novo dictatorship, Prestes was imprisoned for his leading role in the failed 1935 revolution in Brazil.
Originally published in Spanish in 1942, when Amado was in exile in Argentina, the book circulated clandestinely in Brazil until 1945.
A huge success at the time, "O Cavaleiro da esperança" is now only a historical curiosity.
The work becomes didactic by showing how an engaged author operates. To serve the cause well, he defies form and content.
In terms of aesthetics, Amado adopts the socialist realism that prevailed in the Soviet Union.
Addressing an imaginary reader, whom he calls "friend" or "black," he pours out superlative phrases about the myth he helps to create.
Prestes emerges from the story as a caricatured hero. We are facing someone called "star in the black night, storm of the people, lightning in the darkness, northwest wind that shakes tyranny." It's as if Jorge Amado wrote while kneeling.
The style is in no way reminiscent of the novels of manners that, from the end of the 1950s, guaranteed him the prestige possible for an author who always wanted to be famous.
His communist activism marks the beginning of Amado's works. In fiction, however, the author sometimes had to bend to the party's interests, creating characters who did not fully fit the idealized model of the revolutionary proletarian.
The content could serve as a more reliable source of information. It's less a biography than a eulogy.
Leaving aside the hyperbolic adjective, perhaps the best thing is the detailed description of the Prestes Column, which crossed Brazil in the 1920s and contributed to the political circumstances that led to the Revolution of 1930.
Reporting on other episodes is not relevant to the facts. The author describes the meeting with Olga in romantic terms when it becomes known that the Soviet government had appointed Prestes' future wife to ensure his safety.
In another example, Amado clears Prestes of responsibility for the death of young Elza, a companion of a communist leader and accused of treason, when it was clear that the execution order had come from him.
The author left the Communist Party after the disclosure, in 1956, of Stalin's atrocities, but never publicly disowned "The Knight of Hope."
The closest he came to self-criticism was his 1979 admission that the work was naive. He was right.