What do you think?
Rate this book
Agatha Christie: The Woman and Her Mysteries
A feminist analysis of the life and work of the popular mystery writer portrays a strong-willed, passionate woman whose fictional creations explode sexual and other stereotypes
243 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 1990
70 people are currently reading
6378 people want to read
About the author
Gillian Gill
15 books53 followersGillian Gill, who holds a PhD in modern French literature from Cambridge University, has taught at Northeastern, Wellesley, Yale, and Harvard. She is the author of Nightingales: The Extraordinary Upbringing and Curious Life of Miss Florence Nightingale, Agatha Christie: The Woman and Her Mysteries, and Mary Baker Eddy. She lives in suburban Boston.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 29 of 39 reviews
December 3, 2016
This was an interesting read but a bit on the dry side.
Agatha Christie was a very private person. She did not grant interviews and kept a tight rein on any publicity preferring her books to get the press and not herself. She took it to the extreme in that she also wrote her own autobiography that was released after she had died. This way the public would know what she wanted them to know about her life, rather than what the press or publicity hacks concocted about her.
Gillian Gill presents a view of Agathat Christie, her life and writing, through analysis of a selection of Christie's books. Her premise is that Christie did write about her life through her books and characters. Various plot lines seem derived from events in Christie's life and her viewpoint on matters.
Christie also creates characters that are very different from the detectives of the time. Her characters are a bit ahead of the curve in that they are older chronologically but not in mind or activities. There is also the perspective that women as well as men can be the instigator of the crime regardless of class or age.
Some of the analysis of the books gets a bit deep and dry, but the overall information is quite interesting.
Agatha Christie was a very private person. She did not grant interviews and kept a tight rein on any publicity preferring her books to get the press and not herself. She took it to the extreme in that she also wrote her own autobiography that was released after she had died. This way the public would know what she wanted them to know about her life, rather than what the press or publicity hacks concocted about her.
Gillian Gill presents a view of Agathat Christie, her life and writing, through analysis of a selection of Christie's books. Her premise is that Christie did write about her life through her books and characters. Various plot lines seem derived from events in Christie's life and her viewpoint on matters.
Christie also creates characters that are very different from the detectives of the time. Her characters are a bit ahead of the curve in that they are older chronologically but not in mind or activities. There is also the perspective that women as well as men can be the instigator of the crime regardless of class or age.
Some of the analysis of the books gets a bit deep and dry, but the overall information is quite interesting.
August 19, 2008
If you are strong Agatha Christie fans -- like my wife Kati and I our -- you will enjoy author Gillian Gill's in-depth research in trying to understand the camera-shy author, and explore her much-publicized several day disappearance as her first marriage was crumbling. Christie felt the press treated her badly and shunned publicity. In her autobiography, she doesn't mention the incident.
I enjoyed learning about that unfortunate incident and her happy second marriage to a much-younger man. Christie lived a lot like her characters, with large country homes and travels to the sands of Iraq, etc. It was also interesting to learn of her early life, growing up, living in her dream home, her father's death and her love for her mother. In fact, the reader learns that Christie detailed her life, including the deterioration of her first marriage, in novels published under a pseudonym.
So why do I give this only three stars? Two reasons: Gill's dense academic writing style gets in the way; and too much of her deciphering of Christie's life comes from pages-long recaps of her novels. This may have been unavoidable given Christie's penchant for secrecy, but it hampers the flow and reader enjoyment.
But it's worth tackling if you want to learn more about the greatest mystery writer ever.
I enjoyed learning about that unfortunate incident and her happy second marriage to a much-younger man. Christie lived a lot like her characters, with large country homes and travels to the sands of Iraq, etc. It was also interesting to learn of her early life, growing up, living in her dream home, her father's death and her love for her mother. In fact, the reader learns that Christie detailed her life, including the deterioration of her first marriage, in novels published under a pseudonym.
So why do I give this only three stars? Two reasons: Gill's dense academic writing style gets in the way; and too much of her deciphering of Christie's life comes from pages-long recaps of her novels. This may have been unavoidable given Christie's penchant for secrecy, but it hampers the flow and reader enjoyment.
But it's worth tackling if you want to learn more about the greatest mystery writer ever.
August 5, 2024
A great account of Agatha Christie's life and works that was very well described and easy to read. Obviously, a lot of time and research has gone into this book by Gillian Gill
September 15, 2025
#Binge Reviewing my previous Reads # Dame Christie Birthday, September 15
Gillian Gill’s The Woman and Her Mysteries tries to do something that feels risky but rewarding: to map the part of Agatha Christie that lurks behind the fame, the public persona, and the massive output of detective novels. Gill doesn’t just chronicle Christie’s life; she examines her fiction, her characters, and her narrative strategies, trying to trace how Christie’s inner self, her values, her sense of gender, class, and identity, and even her anxieties, emerge in her stories. If you like bookish detective work (like matching motifs, reading between lines, and seeing how life bleeds into art), this book is for you.
Gill begins with the tension: Christie as a figure of seeming conventionality (a comfortable childhood, domestic settings, marriage, motherhood) but also as someone quietly defiant, someone whose novels repeatedly upset stereotypes of gender, class, age, and power. While Christie rarely gave interviews, avoided publicity, and guarded her privacy, Gill argues, we can see a different Christie in how her heroines behave, how crimes happen in her fiction, and how her male and female characters relate. It is a version of biography that uses fiction as evidence, not just ornament.
One of the strongest threads is Gill’s insistence that Christie was feminist (or proto-feminist) in her attitudes, even if she didn't always present herself that way in life. Through her analyses of a range of novels and short stories, Gill shows that Christie often lets women be active agents—they aren’t just victims or love interests, or decorative. They can be sleuths (Miss Marple, Tommy & Tuppence), or they can be criminals, manipulators, or morally ambiguous. Women over age, women with social limitations, and women of different classes—they get space.
Likewise, Gill notes Christie’s willingness to disrupt gendered stereotypes: young men as love interests are not always heroic; beauty or youth are not always the powers we expect; older women are not consigned to invisibility. The mysteries are not just puzzles to solve but constraints Christie plays with. Gill’s feminist lens gives new light to Christie’s recurring themes of justice, of the ordinary, and of evil in everyday settings. (“Ordinary people can harbor murderous thoughts” is something Gill emphasizes as part of Christie’s moral universe.)
Gill also deals with the 1926 disappearance, one of the major “mysteries” of Christie’s life. She shows how Christie essentially shut that chapter against public speculation, controlling the narrative. However, the disappearance remains a hinge: both a public scandal and a private wound, one which Christie never fully explained. Gill’s way of treating it — neither sensationalised nor dropped — is respectful and moving.
Another strength is Gill’s historical and genre context: she locates Christie among other mystery writers and in relation to literary tradition (detective fiction norms, the “Golden Age” of mysteries) and examines how Christie conformed and diverged. Also contextualisation of the social expectations of women in her era, the pressures of marriages and motherhood, of class and gender conventions, and how Christie navigated those in her life and in her work. For someone who teaches or writes, that’s fertile soil: how an author's context constrains and enables, what she accepts, and what she resists.
On the flip side, there are some weaknesses or limitations. Some readers find Gill’s style a bit dry: it is more analytical than narrative, more about comparing novels or tracking themes than developing emotional or psychological depth. Some sections devote quite a lot of space to plot summaries or critical discussion of technique, which for some fans of her biography might feel like sidetracks. If you’re more interested in emotional drama or personal letters or intimate detail, those parts might feel thin.
Also, while Gill does not shy away from criticism (for example, discussing how some of Christie’s early work includes racial stereotypes), some readers feel she does not always push deeply into those problem areas. The moral and cultural blind spots of the era are acknowledged, but sometimes the critique feels a bit apologetic or gentle.
The narrative flow can sometimes suffer: because Gill divides her discussion by age/work periods and interleaves critical analysis heavily with life events, there are moments the biography seems to shift gears sharply — from biographical fact, to novel analysis to thematic discussion — which might disrupt momentum. For readers who prefer more purely narrative biographies, it may feel like oscillations between biography and criticism rather than a smooth life story.
What this book offers that many biographies do less well is a clear lens on how Christie used her fiction as both shield and expression. Gill emphasises that Christie’s public self was guarded, but her fiction allowed her to explore anxieties; or explore roles she could not take publicly. The mysteries are not just entertainment; they are a way of thinking through morality, justice, and identity. That’s inspiring for a writer: it suggests that genre fiction can have moral, psychological, and social depth, even while working within conventions.
For teaching, The Woman and Her Mysteries is excellent. It gives you materials: recurring themes, feminist issues, character analysis, and genre conventions vs subversion. It helps students see that Christie’s “cosy mysteries” often carry undercurrents of commentary. It also provides discussion points: how does Christie manage to be commercially successful and beloved and yet maintain privacy; what does she choose to reveal and what to conceal; how does her environment and era shape her works; and how do the formula and the innovative coexist?
All told, Gill’s biography is strong, nuanced, and thoughtful. It doesn’t give us all the secrets of Christie’s inner life — perhaps because Christie guarded them well — but it gives intellectual respect to her craft and gives the reader a sense of what drove Christie beyond even her awareness at times.
If I had to rate it, I would say it’s essential for Christie fans who want both life and literary criticism, maybe less so for those who want emotional/confessional biography only.
Gillian Gill’s The Woman and Her Mysteries tries to do something that feels risky but rewarding: to map the part of Agatha Christie that lurks behind the fame, the public persona, and the massive output of detective novels. Gill doesn’t just chronicle Christie’s life; she examines her fiction, her characters, and her narrative strategies, trying to trace how Christie’s inner self, her values, her sense of gender, class, and identity, and even her anxieties, emerge in her stories. If you like bookish detective work (like matching motifs, reading between lines, and seeing how life bleeds into art), this book is for you.
Gill begins with the tension: Christie as a figure of seeming conventionality (a comfortable childhood, domestic settings, marriage, motherhood) but also as someone quietly defiant, someone whose novels repeatedly upset stereotypes of gender, class, age, and power. While Christie rarely gave interviews, avoided publicity, and guarded her privacy, Gill argues, we can see a different Christie in how her heroines behave, how crimes happen in her fiction, and how her male and female characters relate. It is a version of biography that uses fiction as evidence, not just ornament.
One of the strongest threads is Gill’s insistence that Christie was feminist (or proto-feminist) in her attitudes, even if she didn't always present herself that way in life. Through her analyses of a range of novels and short stories, Gill shows that Christie often lets women be active agents—they aren’t just victims or love interests, or decorative. They can be sleuths (Miss Marple, Tommy & Tuppence), or they can be criminals, manipulators, or morally ambiguous. Women over age, women with social limitations, and women of different classes—they get space.
Likewise, Gill notes Christie’s willingness to disrupt gendered stereotypes: young men as love interests are not always heroic; beauty or youth are not always the powers we expect; older women are not consigned to invisibility. The mysteries are not just puzzles to solve but constraints Christie plays with. Gill’s feminist lens gives new light to Christie’s recurring themes of justice, of the ordinary, and of evil in everyday settings. (“Ordinary people can harbor murderous thoughts” is something Gill emphasizes as part of Christie’s moral universe.)
Gill also deals with the 1926 disappearance, one of the major “mysteries” of Christie’s life. She shows how Christie essentially shut that chapter against public speculation, controlling the narrative. However, the disappearance remains a hinge: both a public scandal and a private wound, one which Christie never fully explained. Gill’s way of treating it — neither sensationalised nor dropped — is respectful and moving.
Another strength is Gill’s historical and genre context: she locates Christie among other mystery writers and in relation to literary tradition (detective fiction norms, the “Golden Age” of mysteries) and examines how Christie conformed and diverged. Also contextualisation of the social expectations of women in her era, the pressures of marriages and motherhood, of class and gender conventions, and how Christie navigated those in her life and in her work. For someone who teaches or writes, that’s fertile soil: how an author's context constrains and enables, what she accepts, and what she resists.
On the flip side, there are some weaknesses or limitations. Some readers find Gill’s style a bit dry: it is more analytical than narrative, more about comparing novels or tracking themes than developing emotional or psychological depth. Some sections devote quite a lot of space to plot summaries or critical discussion of technique, which for some fans of her biography might feel like sidetracks. If you’re more interested in emotional drama or personal letters or intimate detail, those parts might feel thin.
Also, while Gill does not shy away from criticism (for example, discussing how some of Christie’s early work includes racial stereotypes), some readers feel she does not always push deeply into those problem areas. The moral and cultural blind spots of the era are acknowledged, but sometimes the critique feels a bit apologetic or gentle.
The narrative flow can sometimes suffer: because Gill divides her discussion by age/work periods and interleaves critical analysis heavily with life events, there are moments the biography seems to shift gears sharply — from biographical fact, to novel analysis to thematic discussion — which might disrupt momentum. For readers who prefer more purely narrative biographies, it may feel like oscillations between biography and criticism rather than a smooth life story.
What this book offers that many biographies do less well is a clear lens on how Christie used her fiction as both shield and expression. Gill emphasises that Christie’s public self was guarded, but her fiction allowed her to explore anxieties; or explore roles she could not take publicly. The mysteries are not just entertainment; they are a way of thinking through morality, justice, and identity. That’s inspiring for a writer: it suggests that genre fiction can have moral, psychological, and social depth, even while working within conventions.
For teaching, The Woman and Her Mysteries is excellent. It gives you materials: recurring themes, feminist issues, character analysis, and genre conventions vs subversion. It helps students see that Christie’s “cosy mysteries” often carry undercurrents of commentary. It also provides discussion points: how does Christie manage to be commercially successful and beloved and yet maintain privacy; what does she choose to reveal and what to conceal; how does her environment and era shape her works; and how do the formula and the innovative coexist?
All told, Gill’s biography is strong, nuanced, and thoughtful. It doesn’t give us all the secrets of Christie’s inner life — perhaps because Christie guarded them well — but it gives intellectual respect to her craft and gives the reader a sense of what drove Christie beyond even her awareness at times.
If I had to rate it, I would say it’s essential for Christie fans who want both life and literary criticism, maybe less so for those who want emotional/confessional biography only.
January 9, 2018
It's not that I didn't expect to enjoy learning about Agatha Christie more, it's just that I'm surprised to have enjoyed the actual reading of her biography as much as I did.
Despite some technical/grammatical issues I had, it's obvious that Gill took her undergrad paper-writing lessons to heart, which makes for a nice reading experience, smooth and factual with enough spirit and authorial personality to keep from being dry, most if not all the time.
Probably the biggest accomplishment an artist's bio can have, for me, is making me want to go out and consume the subject's entire canon, and that's what this bio does.
Also, I'm probably a little in love with Agatha Christie now.
Despite some technical/grammatical issues I had, it's obvious that Gill took her undergrad paper-writing lessons to heart, which makes for a nice reading experience, smooth and factual with enough spirit and authorial personality to keep from being dry, most if not all the time.
Probably the biggest accomplishment an artist's bio can have, for me, is making me want to go out and consume the subject's entire canon, and that's what this bio does.
Also, I'm probably a little in love with Agatha Christie now.
August 30, 2017
My Rating System:
* couldn't finish, ** wouldn't recommend, *** would recommend, **** would read again, ***** have read again.
* couldn't finish, ** wouldn't recommend, *** would recommend, **** would read again, ***** have read again.
September 13, 2020
This is by far the most comprehensive & simultaneously readable discussion of Christie as a writer meriting serious critical attention I‘ve read so far. Gill uses the methodological framework Gilbert & Gubar have provided with their literary studies’ classic The Madwoman in the Attic and it works quite well with Christie’s oeuvre. Gill respects Christie as an author who was very keen on keeping her private life private. So there’s very little talk of what were the real feelings & thoughts of Christie or even getting at the woman behind her secrets. Instead takes the secret seriously and contextualises them in the socio-cultural & historical context Christie operated in. Gill reconstructs, to me rather convincingly, a sort of Christiean worldview & its changes over her very long career & how her special form of conservatism might relate to her economical and literary successes as a classic crime story genre writer. She also tackles the racism & antisemitism in Christie head on. The reader learns a lot about the (not only crime) literary traditions Christie consciously worked in (even by rejecting some of them) and about the way she rewrote genre formula & invented a whole bunch of new ones. Gill is never condescending, neither to Christie nor towards readers of her books or of readers of popular genres in general. She even treats the Bulldog Drummond public school boys-school of adventure & spy stories with mild irony. Gills short, very funny summaries of some of the genre defining stories are one of the highlights of the book, actually. As a service to her readers Gill lists at the beginning of her book the stories & novels she’s going to spoiler, but she very intend on not giving away the solutions to most of the works of Christie she’s talking about. And she covers a lot of them, without spoilers. Even if you haven’t read some of her classics, you can read this entertaining & intelligent book about the most successful writer of the 20th Century. For Christie fans it’s a must read.
July 5, 2019
My first Agatha Christie biography, so I certainly learned a lot more about the great authoress from this book than I'd ever known before. There was some great historical background as well that shed light on Agatha's thought processes/context for some of her novels, so good research from Ms. Gill. There were a lot of poignant thoughts and ideas scattered throughout, though sometimes I found the organization/flow of ideas messy or repetitive, which is why it's four rather than five stars. But a very informative, interesting, research-filled biography of a fascinating person that as easy to read and enjoyable. Recommended to fans of Dame Christie who want to know more about the great mind that created so many gems of the mystery genre!
May 3, 2018
The role of biographer was complicated by Christie's reserve and self-protectiveness. In order to provide a sense of Christie as a person, Gill analyzed her subject by parsing Christie's books for insight and explanations. This biographical technique requires conjecture and interpretation that may extrapolate beyond the available data.
November 6, 2021
Ya me parecía una escritora a la que admirar y a la que cualquier autor de misterio que se preciara debía tener muy en cuenta. Pero ahora que conozco cómo fue su vida me parece, sencillamente, que ella fue una mujer única. De las de una entre un millón.
August 11, 2019
VERY interesting and worth the read.
December 2, 2019
Honestly, I would need to read the book again, but will provide review later.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
May 21, 2021
Excellent book. Some great writing
September 21, 2022
Read after an interesting interview with the author on the All About Agatha podcast.
April 28, 2024
Because I love Agatha's books, I pushed myself to read this. Some interesting accounts of her fascinating life.
June 28, 2024
Still going through it and enjoying my reading
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
September 3, 2024
Very interesting - well researched about her life - if you are a "fan" of the Agatha Christie's books, well worth reading.
Read
October 2, 2024None
June 28, 2025
A very in depth account of Agatha Christie. Well written and researched..
November 4, 2025
An interesting read about an interesting author.
July 11, 2009
I enjoyed learning about the woman herself. Chapter 4 was interesting in that Agatha had disappear for a 11 days in December 1926. She abandoned her car and her overnight belongings by the side of the road at Newlands Corner in Surrey and disappeared... 11 days later she was found, apparently the victim of amnesia, in the Hydropathic Hotel in Harrogate. In the remaining forty-nine years of her life, Agatha Christie never wrote about her disappearance or allowed it to be referred to in her presence or in any biographical material she sanctioned. To know anymore about what was written about this I recommend you read the book.
June 29, 2014
Claiming to address the “Actively Detecting Reader” out to discover how Dame Agatha crafted her mysteries, Gill discloses techniques and delineates patterns of plot and character, as well as locates Christie’s detective novels within the tradition of the genre. Its style geared to the general reader, AGATHA CHRISTIE nevertheless betrays its author’s scholarly training; in addition to a foreword, introduction, and afterword, the volume includes endnotes, a bibliography, and an index. It is just an OK read. I love Her Writing (Christie that is) and wanted to learn more about her, this helped. OK read.not great.
May 28, 2013
Agatha Christie was jealous of her privacy and successful in guarding it. With limited access to previously unknown biographical information, Gill has instead chosen to go the biography-through-literary-analysis route, exploring Christie's life and worldview through the lens of her work.
The book is painstakingly researched and has occasional brilliant insights. I didn't always agree with Gill's interpretations of Christie and her works, but 'Agatha Christie' was a thought-provoking book.
The book is painstakingly researched and has occasional brilliant insights. I didn't always agree with Gill's interpretations of Christie and her works, but 'Agatha Christie' was a thought-provoking book.
August 16, 2012
There are so many books about our Agatha, but this one is, by a country mile, the best of the bunch. It is a biography in the true sense; it brings something new our understanding of the writer. One quirk .... I enjoy reading the reference notes on their own -- so well researched and interesting in their own right. Absoultely five stars
August 3, 2016
Interesting book that I think would only really appeal to avid Christie fans. I felt it was a little dry, and belabored some points. But I did enjoy it and learned quite a bit that I didn't know. Extremely well researched, it's obvious the author knows her topic. But I thought, at times, that there was detail for the sake of detail, and not for the sake of good writing.
April 11, 2010
It seems that Christie was too private to leave behind much of a portrait of the woman. Interesting connections between her life and the characters and events in her novels, but too much detail on plot structure.
October 25, 2010
This book wavered between biography and critical analysis of Agatha Christie’s mysteries. Hers are not the type of books I would typically consider suitable for literary analysis. Basically, very boring. I stopped reading after page 55.
July 24, 2015
Earlier this year, I read Dame Agatha's autobiography. I enjoyed it.
This book, while it goes into Mrs. Christie's disappearance in 1927, was less interesting and sometimes down right boring. There were NO photos in this book which would have livened it up considerably.
This book, while it goes into Mrs. Christie's disappearance in 1927, was less interesting and sometimes down right boring. There were NO photos in this book which would have livened it up considerably.
August 6, 2014
I didn't care for this book, even though I have always enjoyed Christie's novels. Gillian Gill obviously knows her stuff, but this was just too dull to fascinate.
Displaying 1 - 29 of 39 reviews