The bold colors of the cover and the premise intrigued me: a world where the ocean swallowed up land and turned poisonous, where corporations and a new government seized power amid the ensuing chaos, leaving a large portion of the population to fend for themselves. Neat idea, right?
This premise, however, is only briefly alluded to in the beginning. I was hoping for a more environmentalist angle, but Nocean's setting quickly devolves into just another generic cyberpunk-y dystopian city. Apart from water shortages (which you could swap with any other resource without altering the story in the slightest), you don't feel any impact of the environmental disaster that apparently had changed the whole world. This is a wasted opportunity and a shame because I think it was a very promising idea and could have set Nocean apart from other stories. That being said, I liked most of the character designs and the world had a little of a The Fifth Element-feel to it, especially Atari's "new" apartment - that's a positive in my book.
Other parts were less successful. I felt the overall writing was not too great and the pacing was clunky and rushed. What I really dislike about Nocean, though, are its politics. I want to echo what another reviewer said: the whole "we're just as bad as them if we use violence!"-sentiment expressed in the story needs to die.
The revolutionaries Atari meets are portrayed as relentless bullies who are unnecessarily rude to restaurant staff and, at one point, are ready to kill a child/teen. Nocean portrays revolutionaries as needlessly cruel and mean-spirited, ready for violence even if it doesn't serve their cause. This flat characterization serves as grounds for Atari to dismiss the group as "equally as bad as Systema" and that is a really harmful take in my opinion. An oppressor perpetrating violence and an oppressed people doing it are NOT the same. Saying the two ARE the same simply is a lie, often used to discourage revolution, and here, I feel this idea is even used to conclude that everything is not as bad as it could be.
In the beginning, Atari is living with Iaia and is mad at her for not fighting the status quo, which prompts Iaia to say that there wouldn't be much use anyway, so she rather keeps a low profile. Atari leaves, stumbles upon a group of revolutionaries, concludes that she isn't onboard with their way of achieving change and, in the end, returns to Iaia, this time content with her living conditions and conceding that Iaia was right all along. Though she vows to change the system "the right way" going forward, we don't know what that means and it seems like she is okay with the status quo.
Additionally, the blurb says Atari & Tika become "modern-day Robin Hoods", even though that storyline doesn't come up in this volume. Though, based on what I've read, I wouldn't be surprised if the story concludes just this way: Robin Hood is not a story about enacting systemic change, but about an individual who decides to help out other individuals in a bad system. Nocean seems to me to follow the same notion (haha, puns), and it is just one I don't agree with in the slightest.
- ARC provided by NetGalley -