What do you think?


On Reflection
In this lavishly illustrated book, Jonathan Miler investigates the efforts of painters to represent the effects of light on various reflective surfaces. Discussing a selection of works from artists as diverse as Rembrandt and Rockwell, he shows that the depiction of reflections has challenged painters for centuries.
- GenresArt
224 pages, Paperback
Published January 1, 1998
About the author
Jonathan Miller
194 books40 followersSir Jonathan Wolfe Miller CBE was a British theatre and opera director, author, television presenter, humorist and sculptor. Trained as a physician in the late 1950s, he first came to prominence in the 1960s with his role in the comedy review Beyond the Fringe with fellow writers and performers Peter Cook, Dudley Moore and Alan Bennett. Despite having seen few operas and not knowing how to read music, he began stage-directing them in the 1970s and became one of the world's leading opera directors with several classic productions to his credit. His best-known production is probably his 1982 "Mafia"-styled Rigoletto set in 1950s Little Italy, Manhattan. He was also a well-known television personality and familiar public intellectual in the UK and US.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
June 21, 2013
So, long before reflectoporn on EBay and selfies on Facebook, artists used mirrors and other reflective surfaces to paint self portraits and create other interesting visual effects. This reproduces the well-known Arnolfini Marriage and The Moneychanger and His Wife, but also less famous paintings as well as photographs by Diane Arbus, André Kertész, Clementina Hawarden, and others.
The reason that there was so little commentary about the art as art, rather than as a depiction of natural and perceptual phenomena, became clear when I got to the author's bio and saw that he was a physician.
It did some things very well — I could count the number of awkward mid-sentence page breaks on one hand. But it was somewhat difficult to identify the works reproduced by title and author — putting this info in small vertical text is an efficient use of space, but a little hard to read.
(The following is not actually a spoiler — just some journal articles cited in the bibliography that I might look up sometime.)
The reason that there was so little commentary about the art as art, rather than as a depiction of natural and perceptual phenomena, became clear when I got to the author's bio and saw that he was a physician.
It did some things very well — I could count the number of awkward mid-sentence page breaks on one hand. But it was somewhat difficult to identify the works reproduced by title and author — putting this info in small vertical text is an efficient use of space, but a little hard to read.
(The following is not actually a spoiler — just some journal articles cited in the bibliography that I might look up sometime.)
August 1, 2008
This book was fascinating. It was published to coincide with a British exhibit called "Mirror Image." Although I didn't know a lot of the artistic terminology used (art history 101 was a long time ago), I still enjoyed the book. The artwork featured in it was great and the commentary very helpful.
July 13, 2012
Coffee table art
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews




