Few books have the ability to change one's life, and this book has all the earmarks of being such a treasure. We are talking about profound changes - something within these pages which strikes at the depth of one's being and causes a powerful (and very welcome) new direction to take hold. To be clear, this book cannot promise to magically transform the reader. But as long as one approaches this work seriously and puts some effort into applying its teachings, then there is a real chance. If you wish to transform your life into something more powerful and more meaningful than what is commonly found within this mundane, worldly, hypnotic form of consciousness that society quietly crams down our throats, then you may have found an answer, and a new path to explore. Herein lies a chance to awaken the Immortal within.
There are for sure some useful insights in here somewhere but the way it's written just leaves you scratching your head so much that I wouldn't recommend this book to anyone. I'm no stranger to spiritual mumbo jumbo either, but this guy is on another level (I don't mean that in an enlightened way).
Look I get it, language is hard, especially when you're describing something intangible, "The Dao that can be named is not the true Dao" and all that. But when you come up with something like "Imagine the difficulty of a single spark within a fire realizing that it is the flame, but trapped in a smaller world that confines it" maybe you should look at a better metaphor like "You are not a drop in the ocean, you are the entire ocean in a drop" and try again.
I try not to rate religious books. The writing was nonsensical at times. I think the gist of it was, you create your own destiny. Don’t be bound by the past or the expectations of society. Go out and be yourself and life your life
I read the Giza book before this and was under the impression the author was a believer, him going out of his way to defend the credibility of the Scriptures in certain cases (Abraham (?) chronicling the genesis narrative from the pyramid). Under that lens his analysis was interesting as I could see how it could be rejected by mainstream Christendom though in reality there is no real contradiction.
But now he outright denies any historical credibility of the scripture’s contents. I don’t get it, the switch I mean. Are you basically a new ager then?
I was deep into Napoleon Hill, outwitting the devil, Andrew Carnegie, Emerson etc, way before I found Mashiah.
I thought you were someone that could bridge the gap between freemasonry, the branch, mazzaroth, etc. in a nice way for the seculars you understand.
But if this is all you’ve got as the fruit of your pilgrimage, I’m disappointed in you man.
This is just new age stuff. I don’t know how to say it.
I delved into this and found it wanting BEFORE I woke up. I don’t get it man.
I guess I should check the dates of the book, hopefully this is like your first book or something. If so, forget everything I said.
If not, and this is your Truth that you’ve painstakingly discovered in your travels, then I’m really disappointed man.
No matter what I cannot reconcile a bringer of Truth talking out of both sides of his mouth regarding the credibility of the scriptures. Even if I was an atheist, this inconsistency will make you untrustworthy so it’s not a Bible-nut issue. Real Truthers wouldn’t be inconsistent in that way.
You straight up denied the historical Truth of the Scriptures and said it was proven fake, no sources either. Dang man.
After reading the Giza book I thought I had made new steps in my efforts to get closer to YHVH, but now after reading this prank of a book all of that, of course, is rendered TRASH and I feel like I just wasted my time giving you the benefit of the doubt.