Please put seven curses on the judge so cruel / That one doctor cannot save him / That two healers cannot heal him / And that three eyes can never see him (Seven Curses – Bob Dylan).
If you were wondering whether or not the number of pages mattered in regards to Madeline Miller’s ability to emotionally devastate with her prose; it doesn’t. In fact, at this point I’m convinced she could ruin me with a single sentence if she wanted to. That's always nice, isn't it? I saw this post on Tumblr that was basically talking about how there’s never really a need for retellings and that every idea based on a specific interpretation of whatever is being interpreted should just be repurposed into an original idea (like how Fifty Shades of Gray was blatant Twilight smut fanfic before the author decided to turn it into her own original work), and while I understand where the sentiment is coming from (make your own art yada yada), I really do think there is something to be had in a deliberate re-contextualization of a previous work. Circe, My Dear Henry, Teach the Torches to Burn, while all of these definitely could have worked had they been touched up a little bit into their own original property, there’s an implicit statement and incentivized reason to read the books listed simply due to them being built off an original work that wouldn’t have been there otherwise. I don’t know, maybe I'm saying this because it's coming from a retelling enthusiast, but I’ve always found it infinitely fascinating to be able to dissect the different ways authors reinterpret their favorite classic literature, and I love seeing different takes on what would have or could have changed had things been a little different. Which is actually pretty funny that I have this stance on retellings in literature at all considering I HATE (all caps) those “What if?” comic book story lines where they’re basically just like, “what if Thanos was wearing a green shirt in this scene” because it’s like… man, who gives a shit! But I guess the difference is that with retellings in prose, they’re usually made with some understanding and love for an original tale that spoke to the author at some point, whereas with comic books, there’s an almost insidious behind-the-scenes corporate force that’s trying to sell a story based solely on some kind of profit margin algorithm rather than it being made with good intentions and a real interest in examining a work of art with fresh eyes and a renewed sense of purpose. Sorry, I didn’t mean to go into my “Marvel hating” shtick this early into an unrelated review, but I guess what I’m saying here is that if you want to do a What if? story line for a well-known property, a retelling, if you will, then the very least you can do as a writer is make it so the details of your new story aren’t so inconsequential to the original that you might as well have not written anything in the first place and that the differences aren’t so world-shattering that it completely changes the thematic mission the work set out to accomplish in the first place. Hey, no big deal, right?
Otherwise, outside of my intense love for retellings in general, I’ve always enjoyed Madeline Miller’s stories specifically because they remind me of those old school “response songs” where there would be one version of the song talking about a break-up, and then someone else would make a song communicating to the first song from the perspective of the other side of the relationship. It’s kind of like how every male country song is about patriotism and tractors or whatever and then all the female sung ones are like, “I’m going to kill my husband and this song will detail my five-step plan to do it”. But yeah, there’s this older, yet very popular dude song called “The Rain” by Oran “Juice” Jones where he goes on this really long monologue at the end of the song (he’s literally just talking) about how he’s done with his cheating girlfriend, talking about how she was a gold digger and didn’t appreciate how he bought her “silk suits, Gucci handbags, blue diamonds, things she couldn’t even pronounce” and it’s funny because even during this read of his, he still tells on himself by also saying that she’s too young to know better, and it’s like… why are you dating someone young enough to patronizingly give out life advice and yet expect her to “know better”. Anyway, the response song decidedly said that she didn’t need his ass or any kind of “cheap ass fur coat” that he has to offer. There’s another song called “Fuck It (I Don't Want You Back)” by Eamon where he goes on about much the same subject matter (except somehow more whiny), and I always laugh at the part in the lady’s response song where she proudly talks about she had “better sex on her own”. So yeah, one of the reasons why Madeline Miller’s work speaks to me is because even though the love for the source material is obvious, there’s a healthy skepticism towards the original mythology that can only come from a place of the deepest respect. And on that note, Galatea might be Miller’s most biting and hard-hitting critique of a male dominant society she's written so far. And while it’s hard for me to sit here and recommend to everyone that they need to go out and read this short story right now due to the fact that it always makes me incredibly sad whenever I flip through it, I think it’s often more pressing for literature to serve as an examination of a particular issue and to hold up a mirror to it rather than focus on chasing happily-ever-after’s. Sometimes a story trading in a cheery ending for everyone involved in lieu of emotional catharsis is much more honest and satisfying than anything "and then everyone had kids" could give us. Take Breaking Bad’s ending for example, it’s not a good time for anyone involved, but the writers understood that Walt telling the truth about his selfish intentions was the only amount of release necessary to stick the landing. It’s not about what people deserve or whether or it was karma that happened to them or whatever else kind of holy roller obsession with divine punishment that always seeps into our stories, the only thing that matters is telling a good story that stays true to itself.
My husband came to the doorway. “Why are you laughing?”
Paphos said, “Why not?” She was taller than the other girls, and long-limbed. She wasn’t afraid of him.
Anyway, I’m sure you know the story of Pygmalion but I’ll talk about it for a little bit because I wasn’t familiar with it until reading Galatea. An incel named Pygmalion decries the “failure of society”, citing prostitutes and any woman of ill-repute, and decides to create the perfect woman out of marble in his own perverted image of purity. It’s kind of like how some company figured that they could make those K-Pop millions by copying Professor Plutonium and throwing seven to eight women in a vat of chemicals at the TikTok algorithm factory in order to create Katseye! Anyway, after realizing no woman could ever match up to his perfect creation, Pygmalion begs his goddess to give life to his beloved statue… then she comes alive and they have a child and live happily-ever-after. The end. Or at least, that’s my understanding of the story, but even then, it’s clear where the inspiration to use Galatea as a forum to air out grievances and explore the depths of systemic misogyny through this man who clearly doesn’t want an equal in a partner, but rather an inanimate thing molded in his image. Galatea isn’t just a Yellow Wallpaper-esque look into women’s place in society at a certain point in time, but also explicit confrontation of the male counterpart’s role in this suffering. Whether that be through inflicting pain directly or sheer complacency, when these kinds of horrors can be acted upon without fear of repercussion, then everyone holds a piece of the blame. This book isn’t saying that you should feel bad for who you are, because a “woe-is-me” attitude helps nobody, it almost makes no statement of any kind, but what it does do is give us a first-hand account of the only course of action a desperate person has when dealing with not just a horrific man, but The Combine itself (you know, like from One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest). My husband, my captor. And this book doesn’t just detail an awful man, but a specific flavor of awful man; a pious man! I don’t mean to say that as a statement of piety in and of itself, but rather what can happen to a person when they’re able to fall back on platitudes of divine encouragement as justification for any and all of their actions. Remember, the man featured in this story isn’t capable of loving his wife, or more importantly, being loved, because his creation of Galatea was an act of hatred and defiance towards all womankind anyway. He’s the kind that wants his wife to have neck-breaking beauty but detests the thought of her having the agency to acknowledge it. So, it’s no wonder the only act of retaliation she has to offer him is to drown his ass, or in other words, give him her own an act of hatred and defiance in return. This version of Pygmalion isn’t just terrible for his treatment of Galatea and their daughter Paphos, but also because society deems it his right to act in such a way. Why would he change his behavior when there’s nothing to change, right? Nobody can do more harm than a man who sets out to do no harm, because none of his actions will be or can be examined under the lens of intentionality!
So yeah, Galatea is a scathing critique because it doesn’t ever feel the need to moralize on its finer points. We as the reader understand that what happens within the contents of the book are wrong (except for when Galatea drowns his ass), all we have to do is turn the page. And as if to underline, highlight, and bold it, I loved the way Pygmalion wasn’t even name dropped in the story proper, but instead delegated to blunt descriptions of his reprehensible behavior. In Galatea, he isn’t a mythological figure, just another filthy pig. Good thing she drowned his ass! Anyway, I should probably wrap this up, because I can’t lie that I’m getting a little heated! I never want to say that a book is important, because saying so ironically dilutes its importance, so I'll just let this book stand as on own. There’s this other post on Tumblr saying “It's really funny how art can be so important and enriching and sometimes downright life-changing but every single piece of art about how important and life-changing art is is the lamest shit ever.” and I felt that. It’s like at the end of Game of Thrones where the writers, D&D, had their self-insert, Tyrion Lannister, wax poetic on the importance of a good story and it immediately made a shitty ending even shittier. It turns the entire thing into edutainment, and trust me, there’s no quicker death to art than the artist trying to teach. Otherwise, I’m just glad Madeline Miller knows that an author only has to rely on the strength of their writing to carry a story. You know how I know George R.R. Martin will never be lauded as a unique voice in literature? Because of how easily his Dunk & Egg stories can be adapted into a graphic novel format. And look, I’m not saying the medium is lesser than literature, but when you can so easily adapt the work into a picture book with few changes and still walk away with the same amount of understanding, then you just know that its strength wasn’t in the writing. That’s like strictly listening to Kid’s Bop and then claiming you’re a Sabrina Carpenter Stan! Anyway, Galatea is a masterpiece because it understands that all you can do through art is paint a picture. You can preach all day about what people go through, “queer folk have it bad in this way”, “women have to deal with this”, but the sad truth is at the end of the day, they’re just words that can and will be ignored by the blissfully ignorant. What makes Madeline Miller’s work so impactful isn’t just that she reinterprets mythology with empathy for the unspoken, but that she also shows us what living as these people is like. I know that’s rather common, “show don’t tell”, but nobody puts you into someone’s headspace in a more visceral way than Madeline Miller. I’ll die on that hill! I mean, take that with a grain of sand, because I’ve died on ant hills before, but whenever the question is posed to me, there’s really no other author I can think of that weaves the same kind of magic with their pen in the same way that Miller does.
That four ears cannot hear him / That five walls cannot hide him / That six diggers cannot bury him / And that seven deaths shall never kill him.