excellent condition in the interior of the paperback book; pages are clean and bright; binding is tight; the spine is intact and uncreased; light wear and a small crease on the bottom right corner on the back of the cover; 298 pages; edition 1989; published by University of Illinois Press (J-22)
Overall, excellent analysis of a union, the hospital workers union District 1199, that promoted a different kind of unionism than much of the labor movement, one that focused on connecting with social movements and challenged racial inequality as a fundamental part of its organizing. The story, however, is complicated, and both Fink and Greenberg do an excellent job of addressing some of these complexities. For instance, while the union promoted a larger social vision, it represented people of color and women, and yet the leadership of the union, for decades, was made up of white men. Also, the union had a largely undemocratic structure in which the presidency was invested with an inordinate amount of power. The question remains, how does union democracy, or the lack thereof, contribute to the vitality of the union movement? I think the authors address this question in interesting ways, but could go much farther and include the question of union democracy as a central theme that runs throughout the book. More to say, particularly about gender and the relationship between the union and advocates of black power and third world politics, but I'll leave it at this for now.
This text provides a comprehensive historical analysis of healthcare unionism, beginning with its conception in the 1960s. Upheaval illustrates how a once-robust union has been slowly decimated and fragmented into an organization that now serves the interests of a high-ranking medical minority, once again leaving the poorest hospital workers forgotten. It truly puts into perspective the power of respectability politics, bureaucratic concessions, and the subsequent loss of an ideological framework in the demise of political movements.
"the fact that so many union leaders have become money hungry, taking on the grossest features of business society, despoiling the union treasures for private gain.. one finds among union leaders an appalling arrogance and high-handedness in their relation to the rank and file, which derives from the corruption of power"
This shift makes Rosa Luxemburg’s analysis of political appeal all the more relevant: "With the entry of a socialist into the government, and class domination continuing to exist, the bourgeois government doesn’t transform itself into a socialist government, but a socialist transforms himself into a bourgeois minister."