Like many of you, I was directed to Greene's book by ACSI's Philosophy of Christian Education certification checklist. I have finished three of the books on the list. I have a great respect for Mr. Greene's legacy and accomplishments, but if you are looking for one book to sub out, I would recommend this one to skip.
A little background on me. I love to read, and I love discussion of the big picture. I have attended many teachers' conferences where I have felt the speaker was fantastic, while meanwhile people around me have been commenting that they wanted more application and more details. Well, I was the one desiring more concrete discussion when reading Greene's book.
Each chapter is written with the ability to stand alone. The consequence is that you will read dozens of sentences over two or even three or four times word for word as he explains things again in subsequent chapters. Perhaps it was the repetition or perhaps the lack of applied discussion, or perhaps my inability to connect with Greene's voice in the book, but I found this book a real labor to finish. As some have observed, it reads more like a paper than a book, and many of the quotes I found most poignant were from other authors, not Greene.
Three big picture takeways are as follows.
1.Unity of the field of knowledge and of facts and the spiritual. There is no secular knowledge. There are no neutral facts. Information should not be walled off by subject, but holistically taught and deliberately applied to life. There is no aspect of reality that does not involve God's active maintenance and upholding. He hits pretty hard against rationalism and even the use of such phrases and concepts as "nature" and "natural law," which he says are "dangerous, destructive modern idols." (p152)
2. Centrality of relationships to a successful Christian school. We have to consider the relational context of what and how we are teaching as much as the "material."
3. Priesthood of all believers ("there are no part time Christian workers") and sacramentalness of all creation and experience.
A couple statements came up more than once that I was skeptical about.
While he was emphatic that no facts were neutral, he states at least twice that, "we teach the same information as the secular school." Does he really believe this? No facts are neutral, yet we all use the same facts? Do we even teach the same concepts and areas?
He states that "In his covenant with creation, God has built his laws into the world. The creation below the human level obeys these laws implicitly." (p199) This idea is reiterated at least two times elsewhere. If he truly believes this, there seems to be some real explaining to do regarding the problem of evil. Is the weasel who killed a whole pen of my ducks for sport, or the mountain lion who eats a passing biker, in implicit subjection to God's laws?
Also in discussing government, he asks whether totalitarianism or libertarianism is right, and asserts libertarianism is the Biblical view, but never alludes to the Bible(p207)! Oops! If might be an example of the ex cathedra style of teaching that his quote from Parker Palmer (p248) warns us not to use, for fear of teaching a "slave ethic."
I did encounter some interesting observations and admonitions. Greene passes the Neil Postman test here. Postman said, "There was a time when educators became famous for providing reasons for learning; now they become famous for inventing a method. " Greene is certainly trying to get teachers to consider first things here, rather than merely falling into some gimmicky scheme of how to teach. However, I teach humanities, and often felt a tremendous leap was required to try to apply some of his discussion. I suspect that math teachers and lower elementary teachers reading this might despair of what to do with much of it.