I bought this book from Book Club Associates, a division of WHSmith, I believe, when I was a teenager many moons ago. Published in 1977, Death in the Long Grass relates stories of big game hunting in Africa, as told by the hunter himself. He must have been a ‘larger than life’ kind of guy, and I certainly would have liked to have spent a couple of hours around a campfire listening to him, though I probably wouldn’t have been able to sleep much afterwards. His Goodreads biographical note says this:
'Peter Hathaway Capstick was an American hunter and author. Born in New Jersey and educated at (although did not graduate from) the University of Virginia, he walked away from a successful Wall Street career shortly before his thirtieth birthday to become a professional hunter, first in Central and South America and later (and most famously) in Africa. Capstick spent much of his life in Africa, a land he called his ‘source of inspiration’. A chain smoker and heavy drinker, he died at age 56 from complications following heart surgery.'
Big game hunting still goes on and is arguably even more controversial now than it was then when the movement to protect wild animals and the danger of extinction of several important (aren’t they all?) species had only been in the public eye for, perhaps, fifteen to twenty years.
As an aside, I am sure that the book and film Elsa the Lion/Born Free had a significant impact on public perceptions of lions in particular, and all wild animals in general. In fact, the author here disparagingly mentions Born Free, blaming the film for making lions seem just like big pussycats when in fact they are ruthless killers. I guess when you have seen firsthand what a lion can do to a human (and you earn your living hunting them), it colours your perspective.
On the other side of the coin, check out a short video on YouTube of ‘Christian the lion’. In the 1960s it was still lawful to own wild animals in England. A couple of young guys bought a lion cub (from Harrods, no less!) and kept him in their fashionable shop in London, where he was a ‘pet’ to them and their upmarket customers. When Christian got too big, they entrusted him to George Adamson (the Born Free guy) who took Christian to Africa and released him. His former owners travelled there a year later to see if Christian would recognise them. The video shows you what happened when they found him. Don't worry, there's no blood.
Returning to controversy for a moment, the author claims that the people who want to hunt big game in Africa, i.e. lion, elephant, leopard and others, have to pay enormous sums in order to obtain a licence to shoot one of each and that the money is ploughed back into protecting the animals, also ensuring that local people have enough of an income that they don’t engage in poaching, thus ensuring survival of those species. I have no idea how much of that was true in 1977 or is now but, given the notorious amount of corruption in several African countries, I have my doubts; in addition to my overall desire not to see wild animals shot for no reason other than that some affluent dentist/stockbroker wants to get close to danger. Having said that, I can understand why people want to hunt; it taps into our ancient instincts. After all, several thousand (or is it tens of thousands?) of Americans go out into the boonies every weekend to shoot deer, quail, doves, pigeons, racoons and goodness knows what else, and wealthy Europeans stalk deer and shoot grouse in Scotland and elsewhere. As the author puts it:
'What, after the fat is boiled away, is the essence of hunting big game? In a word, it is challenge in its most elemental form, the same challenge that provided the drive that brought the hairless, puny-toothed, weak, dawn-creature that became man down out of the trees to hunt meat with his rocks, clubs and pointed sticks. This daring still lives, in varying degrees of mufti, under the flannel breast of the meekest shoe clerk although, like every other primaeval drive that elevated early man, it has been watered down in direct disproportion to our rising self-estimation.'
I believe this to be true. As a boy, I shot at sparrows with an air rifle, much to my mother’s disgust. It wasn’t that I wanted to kill anything, but I wanted to see if I could get close enough to hit the little blighters before they flew away. Now, of course, I am older, wiser (I hope) and don’t do it any more. Likewise, computer games involving war, combat, shooting at things and beating a dangerous opponent are all extremely popular and profitable so we cannot deny our heritage.
At that time and place, big game hunting was done ‘the old-fashioned way’, by which I mean you had to get up close and personal with the animal you wanted to shoot. This made it a very dangerous proposition, as Mr Capstick goes to great lengths to explain: an angry, scared-stiff and wounded ‘any animal with large claws & teeth or tusks and large feet’ in your local vicinity is not something you want to remain close to. He explains it thus in his foreword:
'In hunting big game, facing danger is the height of the hunting ethic. Any bloody fool can, without encountering the smallest modicum of risk, murder a bull elephant at 200 yards with a lung shot. This is not elephant hunting but elephant killing. Yet, to walk for a week, thirsty and footsore over hot, dry thorn-spiked terrain, disappointed a dozen times by small or broken tusks, frightened witless by a female of the species or seemingly unshootable bulls, and then finally to track down a big tusker in heavy cover for a confrontation at less than fifteen yards–well that is elephant hunting. That is man against himself, the last and purest form of the challenges that made us men, not animals.'
So much for why men (and some women) want to hunt – on to the book. The nine chapters are set out by animal, named thus: Lion, Elephant, Leopard, Cape Buffalo, Hippo, Crocodile, Rhino, Snakes and Underrated Killers. The book is, in essence, a series of hair-raising stories where people are mauled, eaten, injured or merely killed by the various wild beasts in the vicinity (their own backyard, it has to be said – none are set in downtown Nairobi). Many involve local people being the unfortunate victims, necessitating the animal concerned being removed in case they do it again. In those situations, Capstick was working unpaid for the government – something the big game hunters had to do to remain on good terms with the authorities issuing their licences. The other stories relate to hunting with clients: the hardships, the mistakes, the adrenalin rush, the fear and ultimate success.
They are not all Peter Hathaway Capstick's personal stories, many are re-tellings of those of other hunters and how they met their demise. Some come across, therefore, as tall tales, exaggerated tales and/or sensationalised, but they are universally fascinating and make avid reading. This is in large part because the author writes well and injects a good deal of ‘black humour’ into the narrative. His descriptive powers are well-developed, and he has a knack for making you feel ‘OMG, what would I do in that scenario?’ (in addition to wetting my pants). As you read each chapter, you decide that, no, maybe lions are not as dangerous as elephants, then, hmm, leopards seem more dangerous than elephants, and finally, it makes no difference, the thing that gets you is the most dangerous.
Despite my desire not to condone big game hunting, I have to say I love this book. It is highly entertaining and quite sobering if you are about to go on a camera safari – don’t get too close! Don’t read it if you are a sensitive soul that will get overly upset by passages describing how someone got her arm chewed off or was trampled into something resembling small roadkill by an angry elephant, but if you love adventure, getting close to the action and you enjoy entertaining writing, put aside your moral convictions for a little while and enjoy something different. Wilbur Smith does it (so well) in fiction, but this is the real thing – mostly.