"A Night or two after a worse Rogue there came, The head of the Gang, one Wordsworth by name . . ."—Coleridge, A Soliloquy of the full Moon, April 1802 Over a dramatic six-month period in 1802, William Wordsworth, S.T. Coleridge, Wordsworth's sister Dorothy, and the two Hutchinson sisters Sara and Mary formed a close-knit group whose members saw or wrote to one another constantly. Coleridge, whose marriage was collapsing, was in love with Sara, and Wordsworth was about to be married to Mary, who would be moving in beside Dorothy in their Grasmere cottage. Throughout this extraordinary period both poets worked on some of their finest and most familiar poems, Coleridge's An Ode and Wordsworth's Immortality Ode. In this fascinating book, John Worthen recreates the group's intertwined lives and the effect they had on one another. Drawing on the group's surviving letters, and poems, as well as Dorothy's diaries, Worthen throws new light on many old problems. He examines the prehistory of the events of 1802, the dynamics of the group between March and July, the summer of 1802, when Wordsworth and Dorothy visited Calais to see his ex-mistress and his daughter Caroline, and the wedding between Wordsworth and Mary in October of that year. In an epilogue he looks forward to the ways in which relationships changed during 1803, concentrating on a single day—11 January 1803—in the lives of the group.
This is definitely not a book for the casual fan of Wordsworth or Coleridge. It is a detailed look at the year 1802, when the group of intellectuals and poets - WW, STC, Dorothy Wordsworth, and the Hutchinson sisters -lived in the Lake District and spent an intensive period in their personal relationships.
Worthen is right to write a group biography here. Forget the Romantic legend of solitary genius recollecting in tranquility. This is a a turbulent year of group investigation. Worthen takes previous biographers to task on a number of assumptions that he punctures with the claim of no evidence; however, Worthen also commits the same sin by implying certain conclusions which he also has no evidence for (Dorothy in love with STC? No direct evidence, though possible). So he loses a star for seeming hypocrisy on that front. Nonetheless, he brings a compulsive read here for those who are fanatics like myself. The microscope he brings to this year - though primarily supported by Dorothy Wordsworth's private journal for the bulk of evidence - is invaluable, even when a reader may disagree with conclusions here or there. An important book for the researcher of these two poets and their lives.